Overview of current CAT systems

The paper surveys the current status of the models for representing, manipulating and analyzing dimensioning and tolerancing data behind the major computer-aided tolerancing (CAT) systems, now commercially available. The solid models and tolerance models that these systems adopt, and their implications for the successful integration of CAT and CAD/CAM are discussed. There are two main purposes. First, the attention is focused on the theoretical backgrounds of every CAT system analyzed, for understanding its limits and its usefulness in design and manufacturing practice. The other purpose is to present a comparison among these systems to support the designer and the manufacturing engineer, as well as the researchers, in the choice of the system will be more proper to everyone. Finally, the research work that remains to be carried out, to improve the future CAT systems and their integration with CAD/CAM is sketched out.

[1]  C. R. Liu,et al.  Review of dimensioning and tolerancing: representation and processing , 1991, Comput. Aided Des..

[2]  L. F. Hauglund,et al.  Least Cost Tolerance Allocation for Mechanical Assemblies with Automated Process Selection , 1990 .

[3]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Structure for supporting geometric tolerances in product definition systems for CIM , 1990 .

[4]  O. W. Salomons,et al.  A computer aided tolerancing tool I: tolerance specification , 1996 .

[5]  Alain Riviere,et al.  A matrix approach to the representation of tolerance zones and clearances , 1997 .

[6]  Kenneth W. Chase,et al.  A survey of research in the application of tolerance analysis to the design of mechanical assemblies , 1991 .

[7]  H.J.J. Kals,et al.  Current status of CAT systems , 1998 .

[8]  Roland Maranzana,et al.  Constrained dimensioning and tolerancing assistance for mechanisms , 1996 .

[9]  Alain Desrochers,et al.  Determination of Part Position Uncertainty Within Mechanical Assembly Using Screw Parameters , 1998 .

[10]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  GLOBAL COORDINATE METHOD FOR DETERMINING SENSITIVITY IN ASSEMBLY TOLERANCE ANALYSIS , 1998 .

[11]  Aristides A. G. Requicha,et al.  Toward a Theory of Geometric Tolerancing , 1983 .

[12]  Philippe Serré,et al.  A Declarative Information Model for Functional Requirements , 1996 .

[13]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  Including Geometric Feature Variations in Tolerance Analysis of Mechanical Assemblies , 1996 .

[14]  Bryan Kok Ann Ngoi,et al.  Optimum Tolerance Allocation in Assembly , 1999 .

[15]  N. P. Juster,et al.  Modelling and representation of dimensions and tolerances: a survey , 1992, Comput. Aided Des..

[16]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  A Comprehensive System for Computer-Aided Tolerance Analysis of 2-D and 3-D Mechanical Assemblies , 1998 .

[17]  Joshua U. Turner,et al.  Review of statistical approaches to tolerance analysis , 1995, Comput. Aided Des..

[18]  T. C. Woo,et al.  Tolerances: Their Analysis and Synthesis , 1990 .

[19]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  Generalized 3-D tolerance analysis of mechanical assemblies with small kinematic adjustments , 1998 .

[20]  Paul J. Drake,et al.  Dimensioning and Tolerancing Handbook , 1999 .