Activity Theory and Its Implications for Writing Instruction

Writing as a Way of Being: Writing Instruction, Nonduality, and the Criwriting itself is an alienating activity, but because our teaching of it, despite advances in theory, still prioritizes textual production over the experience of writing itself. question our basic assumptions and overwhelm us, a bit, with its implications. We will examine contemporary scholarship and research in rhetorical theory and David R. Russell, “Activity Theory and Its Implications for Writing Instruction”. “Writing Center Practice Often Counters Its Theory. So What?” To rephrase this point, Vygotsky asks if student accomplishments while under instruction be removed, as the learner moves toward independent activity” (p. 3). Some key our practices.6. So what are the larger implications for writing center studies?

[1]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning, working and imagining : twelve studies in activity theory , 1990 .

[2]  W. G. Rice.  A Proposal for the Abolition of Freshman English, as It Is Now Commonly Taught, from the College Curriculum , 1960 .

[3]  J. O'neil.  On the New Standards Project: A Conversation with Lauren Resnick and Warren Simmons. , 1993 .

[4]  Charles Bazerman,et al.  Persuasion at a Distance. (Book Reviews: Shaping Written Knowledge. The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science.) , 1990 .

[5]  Patricia L. Carrell,et al.  GENRE ANALYSIS , 2009 .

[6]  Gregory G. Colomb,et al.  The Case for Explicit Teaching: Why What You Don't Know Won't Help You. , 1993 .

[7]  K. Fischer,et al.  Children’s Guided Participation and Participatory Appropriation in Sociocultural Activity Barbara R ogoff , 2014 .

[8]  A. Kitzhaber.  THEMES, THEORIES, AND THERAPY, THE TEACHING OF WRITING IN COLLEGE. THE REPORT OF THE DARTMOUTH STUDY OF STUDENT WRITING. , 1963 .

[9]  Peter Smagorinsky,et al.  The Nature of Knowledge in Composition and Literary Understanding: The Question of Specificity , 1992 .

[10]  Denis Newman,et al.  The Construction Zone: Working for Cognitive Change in School , 1989 .

[11]  A. Kitzhaber.  Death - or Transfiguration? , 1960 .

[12]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[13]  David Russell,et al.  Writing in the Academic Disciplines, 1870-1990: A Curricular History , 1991 .

[14]  P. Smagorinsky,et al.  Cultural Tools and the Classroom Context , 1994 .

[15]  S. Zitner.  Professing Literature , 2014 .

[16]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[17]  Aėlita Kapitonovna Markova,et al.  The teaching and mastery of language , 1979 .

[18]  Alekseĭ Nikolaevich Leontʹev.  Problems of the development of the mind , 1981 .

[19]  S. Miller,et al.  Textual Carnivals: The Politics of Composition , 1990 .

[20]  L. Resnick,et al.  Assessing the Thinking Curriculum: New Tools for Educational Reform , 1992 .

[21]  Aviva Freedman,et al.  Show and Tell? The Role of Explicit Teaching in the Learning of New Genres , 1993, Research in the Teaching of English.

[22]  Rod Ellis,et al.  The Study of Second Language Acquisition , 1994 .

[23]  Sandra U. Gibson,et al.  Literacy demands of the undergraduate curriculum , 1992 .

[24]  P. Smagorinsky,et al.  The Reader, the text, the Context: An Exploration of a Choreographed Response to Literature , 1995 .

[25]  L. Mccarthy,et al.  A Stranger in Strange Lands: A College Student Writing Across the Curriculum , 1985 .

[26]  B. Street.  Literacy in Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[27]  R. Ohmann.  English in America: A Radical View of the Profession , 1976 .