The Use of Interactive Whiteboard in English Vocabulary Acquisition and Learning Effect on Students with Different Proficiency Level

The integration of technology into English teaching is a trend in primary education. The purpose of this study is to explore how the interactive whiteboard IWB can be used in the teaching and learning of English as a Foreign Language. Through a wide range of interactive hands-on activities, the IWB's features are illustrated for the design of English vocabulary learning. The students' pretest and posttest vocabulary knowledge as well as data gathered from their feedback questionnaires were analyzed quantitatively. In addition, high and low achievers were interviewed for identifying the factors which influenced their preference of IWB activities. The results indicated that participants responded positively toward IWB enhanced vocabulary instruction. Students' vocabulary knowledge has achieved significant improvement in associating word sounds to word forms as well as matching word forms to word meanings. The quantitative results show that the preferred IWB activities were strongly influenced by students' language proficiency. Related suggestions are made in how to integrate IWB into vocabulary teaching.

[1]  Rebecca L. Oxford,et al.  Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know , 1990 .

[2]  Kenneth D. Chastain,et al.  Developing second-language skills: Theory to practice , 1988 .

[3]  Julie Mathews-Aydinli,et al.  Turkish students' and teachers' attitudes toward the use of interactive whiteboards in EFL classrooms , 2010 .

[4]  Ian Thompson,et al.  Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: the use of interactive whiteboard technology , 2005 .

[5]  Euline Schmid Cutrim,et al.  Using a voting system in conjunction with interactive whiteboard technology to enhance learning in the English language classroom , 2008 .

[6]  Gary Beauchamp,et al.  Beyond the ‘wow’ factor: developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard , 2005 .

[7]  Paul Meara,et al.  RESEARCHING VOCABULARY THROUGH A WORD KNOWLEDGE FRAMEWORK , 1997, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[8]  Mal Lee,et al.  The Interactive Whiteboard Revolution: Teaching with IWBs , 2009 .

[9]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[10]  J. Gillen,et al.  Using the interactive whiteboard to resource continuity and support multimodal teaching in a primary science classroom , 2008, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[11]  Craig Chraudron,et al.  Research on Metalinguistic Judgments: A Review of Theory, Methods, and Results. , 1983 .

[12]  Gary Beauchamp,et al.  Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards , 2007 .

[13]  Paul Nation,et al.  Teaching and learning vocabulary , 1994 .

[14]  Paul Allum,et al.  Evaluation of CALL: Initial vocabulary learning , 2004, ReCALL.

[15]  John Read,et al.  Assessing Vocabulary by John Read , 2000 .

[16]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Getting to grips with "interactivity": helping teachers assess the educational value of CD-ROMs , 1998, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[17]  L B Leonard,et al.  Word-finding abilities in language-impaired children. , 1986, ASHA monographs.

[18]  Steve Higgins,et al.  Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[19]  Ian Hall,et al.  Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[20]  Julie Marie Wood,et al.  Can software support children's vocabulary development? , 2001 .