The effect of link costs on simple buyer-seller networks

We examine experimentally how link costs affect the formation of links between a single seller and two potential buyers as well as the ensuing bargaining. Theory predicts that link costs lead to less competitive networks, with one link rather than two links, and that link costs do not affect the bargaining outcomes conditional on the network. We find support for the first but not the second prediction. 2-link networks form less frequently when there are link costs. Given that a 2-link network forms, however, a seller on average offers a smaller share of the pie to the buyers in the presence than in the absence of link costs. This impact of link costs can be explained by a disutility for (advantageous) inequality on the part of the seller.

[1]  F. Winden,et al.  Competitive rivalry, social disposition, and subjective well-being: An experiment , 2009 .

[2]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Fairness, Errors and the Power of Competition , 2022 .

[3]  Jacob K. Goeree,et al.  In Search of Stars: Network Formation among Heterogeneous Agents , 2007, Games Econ. Behav..

[4]  S. Zamir,et al.  Bargaining and Market Behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An Experimental Study , 1991 .

[5]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Loss-Avoidance and Forward Induction in Experimental Coordination Games , 1996 .

[6]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Overconfidence and Excess Entry: An Experimental Approach , 1999 .

[7]  Margarida Corominas-Bosch,et al.  Bargaining in a network of buyers and sellers , 2004, J. Econ. Theory.

[8]  Tore Ellingsen,et al.  Sunk costs and fairness in incomplete information bargaining , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[9]  Brit Grosskopf Reinforcement and Directional Learning in the Ultimatum Game with Responder Competition , 2003 .

[10]  Werner Güth,et al.  Equitable choices in bargaining games with joint production , 2001 .

[11]  Siegfried K. Berninghaus,et al.  Cooperation and Forward-Looking Behavior in Hawk-Dove Games in Endogenous Networks: Experimental Evidence I , 2010 .

[12]  B. Huberman,et al.  Searching for the sunk cost fallacy , 2007 .

[13]  G. Doğan Coordination in a 3-player network formation game , 2011 .

[14]  R. McKelvey,et al.  Quantal Response Equilibria for Extensive Form Games , 1998 .

[15]  Werner Güth,et al.  On the reliability of reprocal fairness -An experimental study- , 1997 .

[16]  U. Fischbacher z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[17]  G. Charness,et al.  Bargaining and Network Structure: An Experiment , 2005 .

[18]  A. Riedl Exclusion and Cooperation in Social Network Experiments , 2003 .

[19]  Siegfried K. Berninghaus,et al.  A network experiment in continuous time: The influence of link costs , 2006 .

[20]  John Duffy,et al.  Experiments with network formation , 2008, Games Econ. Behav..

[21]  Owen R. Phillips,et al.  Sunk and Opportunity Costs in Valuation and Bidding , 1991 .

[22]  Charles Bellemare,et al.  MEASURING INEQUITY AVERSION IN A HETEROGENEOUS POPULATION USING EXPERIMENTAL DECISIONS AND SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITIES , 2008 .

[23]  Rense Corten,et al.  Co-evolution of conventions and networks: An experimental study , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[24]  Bodo Vogt,et al.  Evolution of networks—an experimental analysis , 2007 .

[25]  Steven Callander,et al.  Principles of network development and evolution: an experimental study , 2002 .

[26]  J. Potters,et al.  Does auctioning of entry licenses induce collusion? An experimental study , 2006 .

[27]  Sanjeev Goyal,et al.  A Noncooperative Model of Network Formation , 2000 .

[28]  Cary Deck,et al.  Link bidding in laboratory networks , 2004 .

[29]  Armin Falk,et al.  It's All About Connections: Evidence on Network Formation , 2003 .

[30]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition , 2000 .

[31]  R. McKelvey,et al.  Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games , 1995 .

[32]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation , 1999 .