Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

This is a randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the alignment, function, and patient quality-of-life outcomes between patients undergoing conventional (CONV) and computer-assisted (CAS) knee arthroplasty. One hundred and fifteen patients (60 CAS, 55 CONV) underwent cemented total knee arthroplasty. Three patients were lost to follow-up. Eighty-eight percent (CAS) vs 61% (CONV) of knees achieved a mechanical axis within 3 degrees of neutral (P = .003). Aligning femoral rotation with the epicondylar axis was accurately achieved in CAS and CONV with no significant difference. Patients with coronal alignment within 3 degrees of neutral had superior International Knee Society and Short-Form 12 physical scores at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty achieves greater accuracy in implant alignment and this correlates with better knee function and improved quality of life.

[1]  R. Morris,et al.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  Y Kalairajah,et al.  Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted knee surgery?: A prospective, randomised, clinical trial. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  D. Simpson,et al.  Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer-assisted surgery. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  P. Nicolai,et al.  The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  Steffen Kohler,et al.  Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: a case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  Jan Victor,et al.  Image-Based Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Leads to Lower Variability in Coronal Alignment , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  B. Morrey.  Navigated Total Knee Replacement: A Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[8]  K. Buehler,et al.  Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  C. Boéri,et al.  Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation. , 2001, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[11]  Chun‐Hsiung Huang,et al.  Long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  M. Ritter,et al.  Tibial Component Failure Mechanisms in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  Peter Loan,et al.  Computer-Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Replacement: Results of an Initial Experience in Thirty-five Patients , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  L. Dorr,et al.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  E Y Chao,et al.  Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  D S Barrett,et al.  The importance of tibial alignment: finite element analysis of tibial malalignment. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  Scott L Delp,et al.  Surgical navigation for total knee arthroplasty: a perspective. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  M. Tingart,et al.  Navigation in total-knee arthroplastyCT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique , 2004, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[19]  S. Cannon,et al.  The effect of component malalignment on the clinical and radiological outcome of the Kinemax total knee replacement. , 2003, The Knee.

[20]  M. Janeček,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation , 2003, International Orthopaedics.

[21]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Failing Today? , 2002 .

[22]  S. Delp,et al.  Computer assisted knee replacement. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  L. Ryd,et al.  Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty. Results of a survey of 3600 patients from The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  J M Sikorski,et al.  Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[25]  M. Bolognesi,et al.  Computer Navigation versus Standard Instrumentation for TKA: A Single-Surgeon Experience , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  Martin Stockheim,et al.  Computer-Assisted Navigation Increases Precision of Component Placement in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  M. Ritter,et al.  Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  Wolfhart Puhl,et al.  Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[29]  D S Barrett,et al.  Explicit Finite Element Simulation of Eccentric Loading in Total Knee Replacement , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[30]  J. Seon,et al.  Functional impact of navigation-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. , 2005, Orthopedics.

[31]  R. Scott,et al.  Modular fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty with retention of the posterior cruciate ligament. A study of patients followed for a minimum of fifteen years. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[32]  J. Ware,et al.  Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[33]  J M Sikorski,et al.  Computer-assisted total knee replacement. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[34]  Michael Nogler,et al.  Navigation Improves Accuracy of Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[35]  W. Breidahl,et al.  Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.