The World Trade Center evacuation study: Factors associated with initiation and length of time for evacuation

SUMMARY On 11 September 2001, one of the largest workplace evacuations in the U.S. history took place. The evacuation was largely successful: an estimated 87% of all occupants in World Trade Center (WTC) Towers 1 and 2 exited in less than two hours. Evacuation times, however, were highly variable and not entirely explained by the engineering parameters of the buildings. To understand the complexity of factors that potentially influenced the evacuation time on 11 September, 2001, an interdisciplinary research study was conducted by public health scientists from the Mailman School of Public Health at the Columbia University in the New York City. Analysis of survey data collected from a sample of 1444 evacuees identified several facilitators and barriers to length of time to initiate and fully evacuate from WTC Towers 1 and 2. At the individual level, these included sociodemographic and occupational variables, health status, sensory cues, risk perception, delaying behaviors, and following a group or an emergent leader. At the organizational level, factors included emergency preparedness safety climate variables. Structural (environmental) factors included egress route barriers, poor signage, congestion, and communication system failures. Many factors identified in the study are modifiable. Therefore, these data have the potential to inform high-rise preparedness and response policies and procedures. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Guylene Proulx A Comparison of the 1993 and 2001 evacuations of the World Trade Center , 2002 .

[2]  Brian J. Meacham,et al.  Integrating human factors issues into engineered fire safety design , 1999 .

[3]  Robyn R M Gershon,et al.  Roadmap for the Protection of Disaster Research Participants: Findings from the World Trade Center Evacuation Study , 2007, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[4]  T. Drabek Human System Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings , 2011 .

[5]  A. Fleischman,et al.  Ethical issues in research involving victims of terror , 2002, Journal of Urban Health.

[6]  Rita F. Fahy,et al.  Analysis of Published Accounts of the World Trade Center Evacuation. Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster (NIST NCSTAR 1-7A) | NIST , 2005 .

[7]  Robyn R M Gershon,et al.  Factors Associated with High-Rise Evacuation: Qualitative Results from the World Trade Center Evacuation Study , 2007, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[8]  S J Schurman,et al.  Action Research on Occupational Stress: Involving Workers as Researchers , 1989, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[9]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Predicting Emergency Evacuation and Sheltering Behavior: A Structured Analytical Approach , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  S. Borja,et al.  Ethical Issues Pertaining to Research in the Aftermath of Disaster , 2004, Journal of traumatic stress.

[11]  Dennis S. Mileti,et al.  Modeling Pre-Evacuation Delay by Occupants in World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 on September 11, 2001 , 2009 .

[12]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  The UK WTC 9/11 evacuation study: an overview of the methodologies employed and some analysis relating to fatigue, stair travel speeds and occupant response times , 2009 .

[13]  Lawrence W. Green,et al.  Health Education Planning: A Diagnostic Approach , 1979 .

[14]  Ronald W. Perry,et al.  Behavioral foundations of community emergency planning , 1992 .

[15]  Kristine Qureshi,et al.  Worksite Emergency Preparedness: Lessons from the World Trade Center Evacuation Study , 2008 .

[16]  Guylène Proulx,et al.  Occupant Behavior and Evacuation During the Chicago Cook County Administration Building Fire , 2006 .

[17]  Robyn R M Gershon,et al.  Participatory Action Research Methodology in Disaster Research: Results From the World Trade Center Evacuation Study , 2008, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.

[18]  G. Proulx,et al.  Occupant behaviour and evacuation , 2001 .

[19]  B. Israel,et al.  Methods in Community-Based Participatory Research for Health , 2005 .

[20]  Guylène Proulx,et al.  Playing with fire : understanding human behavior in burning buildings , 2003 .

[21]  B. Aguirre,et al.  A Test of the Emergent Norm Theory of Collective Behavior , 1998 .