Consumer-resource body-size relationships in natural food webs.

It has been suggested that differences in body size between consumer and resource species may have important implications for interaction strengths, population dynamics, and eventually food web structure, function, and evolution. Still, the general distribution of consumer-'resource body-size ratios in real ecosystems, and whether they vary systematically among habitats or broad taxonomic groups, is poorly understood. Using a unique global database on consumer and resource body sizes, we show that the mean body-size ratios of aquatic herbivorous and detritivorous consumers are several orders of magnitude larger than those of carnivorous predators. Carnivorous predator-prey body-size ratios vary across different habitats and predator and prey types (invertebrates, ectotherm, and endotherm vertebrates). Predator-prey body-size ratios are on average significantly higher (1) in freshwater habitats than in marine or terrestrial habitats, (2) for vertebrate than for invertebrate predators, and (3) for invertebrate than for ectotherm vertebrate prey. If recent studies that relate body-size ratios to interaction strengths are general, our results suggest that mean consumer-resource interaction strengths may vary systematically across different habitat categories and consumer types.

[1]  M. Emmerson,et al.  Predator–prey body size, interaction strength and the stability of a real food web , 2004 .

[2]  Gutti Jogesh Babu,et al.  Analytical and monte carlo comparisons of six different linear least squares fits , 1992 .

[3]  A. Neutel,et al.  Energetics, Patterns of Interaction Strengths, and Stability in Real Ecosystems , 1995, Science.

[4]  D. Reuman,et al.  Trophic links’ length and slope in the Tuesday Lake food web with species’ body mass and numerical abundance , 2004 .

[5]  H. Godfray,et al.  Body sizes of hosts and parasitoids in individual feeding relationships. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Ecological community description using the food web, species abundance, and body size , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  James H. Brown,et al.  Toward a metabolic theory of ecology , 2004 .

[8]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  BODY SIZES OF CONSUMERS AND THEIR RESOURCES , 2005 .

[9]  Nicolas Loeuille,et al.  Evolutionary emergence of size-structured food webs. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  M. Emmerson,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF INTERACTION STRENGTH IN NATURE , 2005 .

[11]  J. Lawton,et al.  Invertebrate predator-prey body size relationships: an explanation for upper triangular food webs and patterns in food web structure? , 1987, Oecologia.

[12]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Predators, parasitoids and pathogens: species richness, trophic generality and body sizes in a natural food web , 2000 .

[13]  Guy Woodward,et al.  Body size in ecological networks. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  Anje-Margriet Neutel,et al.  Stability in Real Food Webs: Weak Links in Long Loops , 2002, Science.

[15]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Body Size and Consumer-Resource Dynamics , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Scaling up keystone effects from simple to complex ecological networks , 2005 .

[17]  S. Jennings,et al.  Weak cross‐species relationships between body size and trophic level belie powerful size‐based trophic structuring in fish communities , 2001 .

[18]  Jónsson,et al.  Effects of Predator-prey Body Size Ratios on the Stability of Food Chains. , 1998, Journal of Theoretical Biology.

[19]  R. Peters The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .

[20]  D. Reuman,et al.  Estimating Relative Energy Fluxes Using the Food Web, Species Abundance, and Body Size , 2005 .

[21]  Joan Saldaña,et al.  Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs , 1993 .

[22]  Walter Jetz,et al.  The Scaling of Animal Space Use , 2004, Science.