Summer warming and increased winter snow cover affect Sphagnum fuscum growth, structure and production in a sub‐arctic bog

Sphagnum mosses form a major component of northern peatlands, which are expected to experience substantially higher increases in temperature and winter precipitation than the global average. Sphagnum may play an important role in the responses of the global carbon cycle to climate change. We investigated the responses of summer length growth, carpet structure and production in Sphagnum fuscum to experimentally induced changes in climate in a sub-arctic bog. Thereto, we used open-top chambers (OTCs) to create six climate scenarios including changes in summer temperatures, and changes in winter snow cover and spring temperatures. In winter, the OTCs doubled the snow thickness, resulting in 0.5–2.8°C higher average air temperatures. Spring air temperatures in OTCs increased by 1.0°C. Summer warming had a maximum effect of 0.9°C, while vapor pressure deficit was not affected. The climate manipulations had strong effects on S. fuscum. Summer warming enhanced the length increment by 42–62%, whereas bulk density decreased. This resulted in a trend (P<0.10) of enhanced biomass production. Winter snow addition enhanced dry matter production by 33%, despite the fact that the length growth and bulk density did not change significantly. The addition of spring warming to snow addition alone did not significantly enhance this effect, but we may have missed part of the early spring growth. There were no interactions between the manipulations in summer and those in winter/spring, indicating that the effects were additive. Summer warming may in the long term negatively affect productivity through the adverse effects of changes in Sphagnum structure on moisture holding and transporting capacity. Moreover, the strong length growth enhancement may affect interactions with other mosses and vascular plants. Because winter snow addition enhanced the production of S. fuscum without affecting its structure, it may increase the carbon balance of northern peatlands.

[1]  N. Malmer,et al.  Peat formation and mass balance in subarctic ombrotrophic peatlands around Abisko, northern Scandinavia. , 1996 .

[2]  N. J. Rosenberg,et al.  Microclimate: The Biological Environment. , 1976 .

[3]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  THE RESPONSE OF TUNDRA PLANT BIOMASS, ABOVEGROUND PRODUCTION, NITROGEN, AND CO2 FLUX TO EXPERIMENTAL WARMING , 1998 .

[4]  E. Gorham.  Northern Peatlands: Role in the Carbon Cycle and Probable Responses to Climatic Warming. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[5]  J. Titus,et al.  Comparative desiccation tolerance of two Sphagnum mosses , 1984, Oecologia.

[6]  J. Silvola,et al.  Water content and photosynthesis in the peat mosses Sphagnum fuscum and S. angustifolium , 1984 .

[7]  J. Titus,et al.  Contrasting Water Relations of Photosynthesis for Two Sphagnum Mosses , 1983 .

[8]  L. Björn,et al.  Growth of two peat-forming mosses in subarctic mires: species interactions and effects of simulated climate change , 2002 .

[9]  M. Sonesson.  Winter conditions of the poor mires , 1970 .

[10]  F. Chapin,et al.  Plant responses to species removal and experimental warming in Alaskan tussock tundra , 1999 .

[11]  Michael W. Smith,et al.  The Frozen Earth: Fundamentals of Geocryology , 1989 .

[12]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[13]  T. Lindholm.  Growth dynamics of the peat moss Sphagnum fuscum on hummocks on a raised bog in southern Finland. , 1990 .

[14]  H. Rydin.  Competition among bryophytes , 1997 .

[15]  R. Wieder,et al.  Net Primary Production of the Dominant Bryophytes in a Sphagnum-Dominated Wetland in West Virginia , 1983 .

[16]  I. Backéus.  Weather variables as predictors of Sphagnum growth on a bog , 1988 .

[17]  Karen Updegraff,et al.  RESPONSE OF CO2 AND CH4 EMISSIONS FROM PEATLANDS TO WARMING AND WATER TABLE MANIPULATION , 2001 .

[18]  R. S. Clymo,et al.  The Ecology of Sphagnum , 1982 .

[19]  G. Henry,et al.  Open‐top designs for manipulating field temperature in high‐latitude ecosystems , 1997 .

[20]  Steven F. Oberbauer,et al.  10 – The Ecosystem Role of Poikilohydric Tundra Plants , 1992 .

[21]  T. Moore.  Growth and net production of Sphagnum at five fen sites, subarctic eastern Canada , 1989 .

[22]  S. Hobbie.  Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra , 1996 .

[23]  J. Tenhunen,et al.  Irradiance and temperature effects on photosynthesis of tussock tundra Sphagnum mosses from the foothills of the Philip Smith Mountains, Alaska , 1989, Oecologia.

[24]  B. Rydén,et al.  Stordalen (Abisko), Sweden. , 1975 .

[25]  J. Welker,et al.  Experimental manipulations of snow‐depth: effects on nutrient content of caribou forage , 1997 .

[26]  H. Vasander,et al.  Production of eight species of Sphagnum at Suurisuo mire, southern Finland. , 1990 .

[27]  R. S. Clymo.  THE GROWTH OF SPHAGNUM: METHODS OF MEASUREMENT , 1970 .

[28]  Jukka Turunen,et al.  Carbon accumulation in peatland , 1998 .

[29]  M. H. Jones,et al.  Carbon dioxide fluxes in moist and dry arctic tundra during the snow-free season: responses to increases in summer temperature and winter snow accumulation , 1998 .

[30]  Barrie Maxwell,et al.  2 – Arctic Climate: Potential for Change under Global Warming , 1992 .

[31]  W. Oechel,et al.  Moss functioning in different taiga ecosystems in interior Alaska , 1981, Oecologia.