Optimization of a pebble bed configuration for quasi-direct numerical simulation

a b s t r a c t A high temperature reactor (HTR) is envisaged to be one of the renewed reactor designs to play a role in nuclear power generation including process heat applications. The HTR design concept exhibits excel- lent safety features due to the low power density and the large amount of graphite present in the core which gives a large thermal inertia in the event of an accident such as loss of coolant. However, the possible appearance of hot spots in the pebble bed cores of HTR may affect the integrity of the pebbles. This has drawn the attention of several scientists to understand this highly three-dimensional complex phenomenon. A good prediction of the flow and heat transport in such a pebble bed core is a challenge for CFD based on the available turbulence models and computational power. Such models need to be validated in order to gain trust in the simulation of these types of flow configurations. Direct numerical simulation (DNS), while imposing some restrictions in terms of flow parameters and numerical tools corresponding to the available computational resources, can serve as a reference for model development and validation. In the present article, a wide range of numerical simulations has been performed in order to optimize a pebble bed configuration for quasi-DNS which may serve as reference for validation. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  Anthony J. Baratta,et al.  Modeling of the Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer an a Pebble Bed Modular Reactor Core With a Computational Fluid Dynamics Code , 2002 .

[2]  D. Jakeman.  Physics of nuclear reactors , 1966 .

[3]  Yassin A. Hassan,et al.  CFD Simulation of a Coolant Flow and a Heat Transfer in a Pebble Bed Reactor , 2008 .

[4]  Christer Fureby,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation: Current Capabilities, Recommended Practices, and Future Research , 2009 .

[5]  Yassin A. Hassan,et al.  Measurements of Flow Modification by Particle Deposition Inside a Packed Bed Using Time-Resolved PIV , 2008 .

[6]  Tae Hyun Chun,et al.  CFD Analysis of the Fuel Temperature in High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors , 2005 .

[7]  Chin-Hoh Moeng,et al.  LARGE EDDY SIMULATION , 2002 .

[8]  N Jarrin,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of flow across in-line tube bundles , 2005 .

[9]  Yassin A. Hassan,et al.  Large eddy simulation in pebble bed gas cooled core reactors , 2008 .

[10]  Su-Jong Yoon,et al.  Turbulence-induced Heat Transfer in PBMR Core Using LES and RANS , 2007 .

[11]  Chung-Yun Wu,et al.  Investigating the advantages and disadvantages of realistic approach and porous approach for closely packed pebbles in CFD simulation , 2010 .

[12]  V. C. Patel,et al.  Longitudinal curvature effects in turbulent boundary layers , 1997 .

[13]  Borut Mavko,et al.  DNS of Turbulent Heat Transfer in Channel Flow With Heat Conduction in the Solid Wall , 2001 .

[14]  Jae Young Lee,et al.  Flow Visualization of Pebble Bed HTGR , 2008 .

[15]  Rainer Moormann,et al.  A Safety Re-Evaluation of the AVR Pebble Bed Reactor Operation and Its Consequences for Future HTR Concepts , 2008 .

[16]  Gokhan Yesilyurt.  Numerical simulation of flow distribution for pebble bed high temperature gas cooled reactors , 2004 .