Gliding behaviour elicited by lateral looming stimuli in flying locusts

We challenged tethered, flying locusts with visual stimuli looming from the side towards one eye in a way that mimics the approach of a predatory bird. Locusts respond to the lateral approach of a looming object with steering movements and a stereotyped, rapid behaviour in which the wingbeat pattern ceases and the wings are swept into a gliding posture. This gliding behaviour may cause the locust to dive. The gliding posture is maintained for 200 ms or more after which flight is resumed with an increased wingbeat frequency or else the wings are folded. A glide begins with a strong burst of activity in the mesothoracic second tergosternal motor neuron (no. 84) on both sides of the locust. Recordings of descending contralateral movement detector (DCMD) activity in a flying locust show that it responds to small (80-mm diameter) looming stimuli during tethered flight, with a prolonged burst of spikes that tracks stimulus approach and reaches peak instantaneous frequencies as, or after, stimulus motion ceases. There is a close match between the visual stimuli that elicit a gliding behaviour and those that are effective at exciting the DCMD neuron. Wing elevation into the gliding posture occurs during a maintained burst of high frequency DCMD spikes.

[1]  Charles Wheatstone,et al.  Contributions to the Physiology of Vision. , 1837 .

[2]  Charles Wheatstone,et al.  I. The Bakerian Lecture.— Contributions to the physiology of vision.— Part the second. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision (continued) , 1852, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[3]  R. Snodgrass.  The thoracic mechanism of a grasshopper, and its antecedents , 1929 .

[4]  T. Weis-Fogh.  Biology and Physics of locust flight II. Flight performance of the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria) , 1956, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[5]  M. Jensen.  Biology and physics of locust flight. III. The aerodynamics of locust flight , 1956, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[6]  J. Gibson.  Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. , 1998, British journal of psychology.

[7]  K. D. Roeder.  The behaviour of free flying moths in the presence of artificial ultrasonic pulses , 1962 .

[8]  Michael O'Shea,et al.  The Anatomy of a Locust Visual Interneurone; the Descending Contralateral Movement Detector , 1974 .

[9]  L. Miller.  The behaviour of flying green lacewings, Chrysopa carnea, in the presence of ultrasound , 1975 .

[10]  G. Schlotterer.  Response of the locust descending movement detector neuron to rapidly approaching and withdrawing visual stimuli , 1977 .

[11]  H. Southern,et al.  Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa; the Birds of the Western Palearctic , 1978 .

[12]  M. Cloupeau,et al.  Direct Measurements of Instantaneous Lift in Desert Locust; Comparison with Jensen'S Experiments on Detached Wings , 1979 .

[13]  Peter J. Simmons,et al.  A LOCUST WIND AND OCELLAR BRAIN NEURONE , 1980 .

[14]  Peter J. Simmons,et al.  Connexions between a movement-detecting visual interneurone and flight motoneurones of a locust. , 1980 .

[15]  F C Rind,et al.  A chemical synapse between two motion detecting neurones in the locust brain. , 1984, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  K. Pearson,et al.  Heterogeneous properties of segmentally homologous interneurons in the ventral nerve cord of locusts , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  C. Rowell,et al.  Integration of nonphaselocked exteroceptive information in the control of rhythmic flight in the locust. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  C. H. F. Rowell,et al.  Neuronal circuits controlling flight in the locust: how sensory information is processed for motor control , 1986, Trends in Neurosciences.

[19]  D. Robert.  THE AUDITORY BEHAVIOUR OF FLYING LOCUSTS , 1989 .

[20]  P. Brodfuehrer,et al.  The neuroethology of acoustic startle and escape in flying insects. , 1989, The Journal of experimental biology.

[21]  D D Yager,et al.  Ultrasound-triggered, flight-gated evasive maneuvers in the praying mantis Parasphendale agrionina. II. Tethered flight. , 1990, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  M. Fenton,et al.  Ultrasound-triggered, flight-gated evasive maneuvers in the praying mantis Parasphendale agrionina. I. Free flight. , 1990, The Journal of experimental biology.

[23]  P. Simmons,et al.  Orthopteran DCMD neuron: a reevaluation of responses to moving objects. I. Selective responses to approaching objects. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  D. N. Reye,et al.  WING MOVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH COLLISIONAVOIDANCE MANOEUVRES DURING FLIGHT IN THE LOCUST LOCUSTA MIGRATORIA , 1992 .

[25]  F C Rind,et al.  Orthopteran DCMD neuron: a reevaluation of responses to moving objects. II. Critical cues for detecting approaching objects. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  C. Fry,et al.  Kingfishers, Bee-Eaters, & Rollers: A Handbook , 1992 .

[27]  R. Robertson,et al.  Collision avoidance of flying locusts: steering torques and behaviour , 1993 .

[28]  Rind,et al.  The locust DCMD, a movement-detecting neurone tightly tuned to collision trajectories , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[29]  F. Claire Rind,et al.  Responses to object approach by a wide field visual neurone, the LGMD2 of the locust: Characterization and image cues , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[30]  K. D. Roeder,et al.  Nerve Cells and Insect Behavior , 1998 .

[31]  G. Laurent,et al.  Computation of Object Approach by a Wide-Field, Motion-Sensitive Neuron , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  G. Taylor,et al.  Animal flight dynamics I. Stability in gliding flight. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[33]  John R. Gray,et al.  Activity of descending contralateral movement detector neurons and collision avoidance behaviour in response to head-on visual stimuli in locusts , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[34]  J. Schul,et al.  Ultrasound avoidance behaviour in the bushcricket Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[35]  J. W. Dawson,et al.  Auditory-evoked evasive manoeuvres in free-flying locusts and moths , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[36]  Synaptic input converging onto an identified premotor interneuron in the locust is gated according to modality , 2004, The Science of Nature.

[37]  C. Rowell,et al.  A spike-transmitting electrical synapse between visual interneurones in the locust movement detector system , 1975, Journal of comparative physiology.

[38]  M. Burrows,et al.  Connections between descending visual interneurons and metathoracic motoneurons in the locust , 1973, Journal of comparative physiology.

[39]  C. Pond.  Neuromuscular activity and wing movements at the start of flight ofPeriplaneta americana andSchistocerca gregaria , 1972, Journal of comparative physiology.

[40]  Jeffrey M. Camhi,et al.  The escape behavior of the cockroachPeriplaneta americana , 1978, Journal of comparative physiology.

[41]  Jeffrey M. Camhi,et al.  The escape behavior of the cockroachPeriplaneta americana , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[42]  R. Cooter,et al.  The natural flight of the migratory locust,Locusta migratoria L. , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[43]  Roger D Santer,et al.  Collision avoidance and a looming sensitive neuron: size matters but biggest is not necessarily best , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  R. Hoy,et al.  Ultrasonic startle behavior in bushcrickets (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae) , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[45]  J. Rowcliffe,et al.  A simple rule for the costs of vigilance: empirical evidence from a social forager , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  M. Gewecke,et al.  The natural flight of the migratory locust,Locusta migratoria L. , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[47]  Edwin E. Lewis,et al.  Biology and behaviour. , 2005 .