When Does Teamwork Translate Into Improved Team Performance? A Resource Allocation Perspective

Drawing on resource allocation theory, the authors examined boundary conditions for the positive effects of two aspects of teamwork (backing up behavior and performance monitoring) on team performance. Participants were 276 undergraduate business students who were organized into 69 teams and who worked on a computer simulation across multiple performance episodes. Approximately half the teams experienced a workload distribution problem. Results indicated that performance monitoring had positive effects on team performance when teams experienced a workload distribution problem. Backing up behavior had positive effects only when teams had both a workload distribution problem and during early performance episodes. The findings of this study suggest that resource allocation theory can provide insights regarding when members should devote and coordinate their own individual resources to assist others in teams. The implications of these findings for future theory and practice regarding teamwork are discussed.

[1]  D. Chan.  Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models , 1998 .

[2]  R. Moreland,et al.  Exploring the Performance Benefits of Group Training: Transactive Memory or Improved Communication? , 2000 .

[3]  E. Sundstrom,et al.  Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. , 1990 .

[4]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[5]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Personal norms and the mediation of legitimacy effects on helping. , 1978 .

[7]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Backing up behaviors in teams: the role of personality and legitimacy of need. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  C. Burke,et al.  The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training. , 1998 .

[10]  R. Mcintyre,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Teamwork Measurement , 1997 .

[11]  Tal Katz-Navon,et al.  When Collective- and Self-Efficacy Affect Team Performance , 2005 .

[12]  Elliot E. Entin,et al.  Team coordination training. , 1998 .

[13]  Lisa M. Bradley,et al.  Differential Effects of Task and Reward Interdependence on Perceived Helping Behavior, Effort, and Group Performance , 2003 .

[14]  Wanda J. Campbell,et al.  The Evolution of Teamwork Skills: An Empirical Assessment with Implications for Training , 1987 .

[15]  Freda Kemp.  Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 2003 .

[16]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[17]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  Examining Team Planning Through an Episodic Lens , 2008 .

[18]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[19]  B. B. Morgan,et al.  Team Workload: Its Meaning and Measurement , 1997 .

[20]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Work Groups and Teams in Organizations , 2003 .

[21]  Eric D. Sundstrom,et al.  Supporting work team effectiveness : best management practices for fostering high performance , 1999 .

[22]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[23]  R. Moreland,et al.  Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[24]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition , 1989 .

[25]  Joseph E. McGrath,et al.  Time matters in groups , 1990 .

[26]  M. Marks,et al.  The Influence of Team Monitoring on Team Processes and Performance , 2004 .

[27]  E. Salas,et al.  Team performance assessment and measurement , 1997 .

[28]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Empowerment and team effectiveness: an empirical test of an integrated model. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .

[30]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Structural contingency theory and individual differences: examination of external and internal person-team fit. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  T. Tyler,et al.  Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[32]  Christopher O. L. H. Porter,et al.  Goal orientation: effects on backing up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  Christopher M. Barnes,et al.  Harmful help: the costs of backing-up behavior in teams. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  B. B. Morgan,et al.  An Analysis of Team Evolution and Maturation , 1993 .