Impacts of demand side management on bulk system reliability evaluation considering load forecast uncertainty

Electric power utilities are facing with increasing awareness of environment conditions and very expensive infrastructure investments due to the continually increasing demand for electricity. Demand side management can play a very important role in meeting the challenges faced by power utilities. This paper is mainly focused on the effects of one aspect of the various demand side management measures, which is load shifting, on reliability indices, reliability index probability distributions and peak load carrying capabilities for a bulk electric system. Load forecast uncertainty is an important consideration in an electric power system particularly when there is increased competition in the electric utility industry and more comprehensive risk evaluation is required. The interactive impacts of demand side management programs and the consideration of load forecast uncertainty on system reliability are also investigated.

[1]  Gengyin Li,et al.  Impact of Demand Side Management on Composite Generation and Transmission System Reliability , 2006, 2006 IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[2]  Mahmud Fotuhi-Firuzabad,et al.  Impact of load management on composite system reliability evaluation short-term operating benefits , 2000 .

[3]  R. Billinton,et al.  Load forecast uncertainty considerations in bulk electric system reliability assessment , 2008, 2008 40th North American Power Symposium.

[4]  Jack E. Runnels Impacts of Demand-Side Management on T and D - Now and Tomorrow , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  Clark W. Gellings,et al.  Integrating Demand-Side Management into Utility Planning , 1986 .

[6]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[7]  C.W. Gellings,et al.  The concept of demand-side management for electric utilities , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Impacts of demand-side management on reliability cost/reliability worth analysis , 1996 .

[9]  R. Billinton,et al.  Basic Concepts in Generating Capacity Adequacy Evaluation , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems.

[10]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Reliability evaluation of power systems , 1984 .

[11]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo simulation for composite power system reliability analysis with time varying loads , 1995 .

[12]  Jen-Nan Sheen,et al.  Economic profitability analysis of demand side management program , 2005 .

[13]  O. P. Veloza,et al.  Review of developed demand side management programs including different concepts and their results , 2008, 2008 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America.

[14]  Satish Saini,et al.  Conservation v. generation , 2004 .

[15]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Effect of bus load uncertainty and correlation in composite system adequacy evaluation , 1991 .

[16]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Effects of demand side management on bulk system adequacy evaluation , 2010, 2010 IEEE 11th International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems.

[17]  Arif S. Malik Modelling and economic analysis of DSM programs in generation planning , 2001 .

[18]  Probability Subcommittee,et al.  IEEE Reliability Test System , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[19]  Jyoti K. Parikh,et al.  Economic and environmental impacts of demand side management programmes , 1997 .

[20]  R. Azami,et al.  Impact of demand response programs on system and nodal reliability of a deregulated power system , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies.

[21]  R. G. Huff,et al.  Demand-side management impact on the transmission and distribution system , 1990 .