Measuring health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: validity, responsiveness and reliability of EuroQol (EQ-5D).

The EuroQol (EQ-5D) generic health index comprises a five-part questionnaire and a visual analogue self-rating scale. The questionnaire may be used as a health index to calculate a 'utility' value or as a health profile. The validity, reliability and responsiveness of EQ-5D were tested in 233 patients with rheumatoid arthritis stratified by functional class. EQ-5D demonstrated moderate to high correlations with measures of impairment and high correlations with disability measures. Stepwise regression models showed that EQ-5D utility values and visual analogue scores were explained best as a function of pain, disability, disease activity and mood (R2 approximately 70%), although other variables (side-effects, years of education) were required to explain the visual analogue scores. The EQ-5D health index and visual analogue scale are more responsive than any of the other measures, except pain and doctor-assessed disease activity. The reliability of the EQ-5D index and EQ-5D visual analogue scale is as good or better than that of all other instruments except the Health Assessment Questionnaire. Some patients with severe long-standing disease had health states which attracted utility values below zero, i.e. from a societal perspective they were regarded as being in states 'worse than death'. The practical and ethical implications of these utility valuations are discussed, and at present the utility values should be used and interpreted with caution. With this caveat, EQ-5D is simple to use, valid, responsive to change and sufficiently reliable for group comparisons. It is of potential use as an outcome measure in clinical trials, audit and health economic studies, but further work is required on its performance in other clinical contexts and on the interpretation of the utility values.

[1]  E M Badley,et al.  An overview of disability. , 1996, British journal of rheumatology.

[2]  G W Torrance,et al.  A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. , 1972, Health services research.

[3]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  J J Anderson,et al.  The American college of rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials , 1993 .

[5]  M. Liang,et al.  Comparative Measurement Sensitivity of Short and Longer Health Status Instruments , 1992, Medical care.

[6]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[7]  O. Steinbrocker,et al.  Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1949, Journal of the American Medical Association.

[8]  D. Streiner,et al.  Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to thier development and use , 1989 .

[9]  R. Snaith,et al.  The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale , 1983 .

[10]  K. Calman,et al.  QultIflf ncne ains-a Quality of life in cancer patients -an hypothesis , 2006 .

[11]  R. Robinson,et al.  Economic Evaluation and Health Care Cost-utility analysis , 2006 .

[12]  R. Robinson The policy context. , 1993, BMJ.

[13]  J. Reading,et al.  Reduced joint count indices in the evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1985, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[14]  P. Dolan,et al.  The effect of past and present illness experience on the valuations of health states. , 1995, Medical care.

[15]  Health economics as an aspect of health outcome: basic principles and application in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1995, British journal of rheumatology.