Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: effects of group size.

Individuals and groups of 2, 3, 4, or 5 people solved 2 letters-to-numbers problems that required participants, on each trial, to identify the coding of 10 letters to 10 numbers by proposing an equation in letters, receiving the answer in letters, proposing a hypothesis, and receiving feedback on the correctness of the hypothesis. Groups of 3, 4, and 5 people proposed more complex equations and had fewer trials to solution than the best of an equivalent number of individuals. Groups of 3, 4, and 5 people had fewer trials to solution than 2-person groups but did not differ from each other. These results suggest that 3-person groups are necessary and sufficient to perform better than the best individuals on highly intellective problems.

[1]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[2]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. , 1995 .

[3]  E. H. Witte,et al.  Understanding Group Behavior , 2018 .

[4]  G. W. Hill.  Group versus individual performance: are n + 1 heads better than one?" psychological bulletin , 1982 .

[5]  Patrick R. Laughlin,et al.  Group size, member ability, and social decision schemes on an intellective task. , 1975 .

[6]  P. Reagan-Cirincione,et al.  Improving the Accuracy of Group Judgment: A Process Intervention Combining Group Facilitation, Social Judgment Analysis, and Information Technology , 1994 .

[7]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[8]  J. Klayman.  Varieties of Confirmation Bias , 1995 .

[9]  Herbert Solomon,et al.  Two models of group behavior in the solution of eureka-type problems , 1955 .

[10]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[11]  J. H. Davis,et al.  Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples 1950-1990 , 1992 .

[12]  R. Paul Butler,et al.  A Second Planet Orbiting 47 Ursae Majoris , 2002 .

[13]  J. Davitz,et al.  A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance, 1920-1957. , 1958, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  Patrick R. Laughlin,et al.  Social combination processes and individual learning for six-person cooperative groups on an intellective task. , 1980 .

[15]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[16]  N. Kerr,et al.  Social decision schemes of the same four-person groups on two different intellective tasks. , 1976 .

[17]  J. McGrath.  Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[18]  Bryan L. Bonner,et al.  Collective versus individual induction with single versus multiple hypotheses , 1998 .

[19]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Collective versus individual induction : recognition of truth, rejection of error, and collective information processing , 1991 .

[21]  Tatsuya Kameda,et al.  Effects of Assigned Group Consensus Requirement on Group Problem Solving and Group Members' Learning , 1991 .

[22]  R. Abelson.  Statistics As Principled Argument , 1995 .

[23]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group Process, Group Decision, Group Action , 1992 .

[24]  I. Steiner.  Models for inferring relationships between group size and potential group productivity. , 1966, Behavioral science.

[25]  L. R. Hoffman.  Group Problem Solving1 , 1965 .

[26]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Collective Induction: Twelve Postulates. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[27]  Philip Yetton,et al.  An integration of process and decision scheme explanations of group problem solving performance , 1988 .

[28]  N. Kerr,et al.  Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. , 1996 .

[29]  D. Fischer,et al.  Extrasolar Planets around Main Sequence Stars , 1999 .

[30]  J. Klayman,et al.  Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .

[31]  Glenn E. Littlepage,et al.  An input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. , 1995 .

[32]  R. Hastie,et al.  Proper analysis of the accuracy of group judgments , 1997 .

[33]  M. Fishbein.  Progress in social psychology , 1980 .

[34]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. , 1986 .

[35]  M. E. Shaw.  A comparison of individuals and small groups in the rational solution of complex problems. , 1932 .