Nonlocal correlations as an information-theoretic resource

It is well known that measurements performed on spatially separated entangled quantum systems can give rise to correlations that are nonlocal, in the sense that a Bell inequality is violated. They cannot, however, be used for superluminal signaling. It is also known that it is possible to write down sets of 'superquantum' correlations that are more nonlocal than is allowed by quantum mechanics, yet are still nonsignaling. Viewed as an information-theoretic resource, superquantum correlations are very powerful at reducing the amount of communication needed for distributed computational tasks. An intriguing question is why quantum mechanics does not allow these more powerful correlations. We aim to shed light on the range of quantum possibilities by placing them within a wider context. With this in mind, we investigate the set of correlations that are constrained only by the no-signaling principle. These correlations form a polytope, which contains the quantum correlations as a (proper) subset. We determine the vertices of the no-signaling polytope in the case that two observers each choose from two possible measurements with d outcomes. We then consider how interconversions between different sorts of correlations may be achieved. Finally, we consider some multipartite examples.

[1]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[2]  S. Pironio,et al.  Violations of Bell inequalities as lower bounds on the communication cost of nonlocal correlations , 2003, quant-ph/0304176.

[3]  M. Wolf,et al.  Bell inequalities and entanglement , 2001, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[4]  S. Popescu,et al.  Classical analog of entanglement , 2001, quant-ph/0107082.

[5]  S. Massar,et al.  Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high-dimensional systems. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[6]  A. Aspect Bell's inequality test: more ideal than ever , 1999, Nature.

[7]  Alain Tapp,et al.  Quantum Entanglement and the Communication Complexity of the Inner Product Function , 1997, QCQC.

[8]  R. Cleve,et al.  SUBSTITUTING QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT FOR COMMUNICATION , 1997, quant-ph/9704026.

[9]  S. Popescu,et al.  Quantum nonlocality as an axiom , 1994 .

[10]  A. V. Belinskii,et al.  Interference of light and Bell's theorem , 1993 .

[11]  Rudolf Ahlswede,et al.  Common randomness in information theory and cryptography - I: Secret sharing , 1993, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Kiel T. Williams,et al.  Extreme quantum entanglement in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[13]  L. J. Landau,et al.  Empirical two-point correlation functions , 1988 .

[14]  Svetlichny,et al.  Distinguishing three-body from two-body nonseparability by a Bell-type inequality. , 1987, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[15]  B. Tsirelson Quantum analogues of the Bell inequalities. The case of two spatially separated domains , 1987 .

[16]  A. Fine Hidden Variables, Joint Probability, and the Bell Inequalities , 1982 .

[17]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[18]  J. Bell On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox , 1964 .

[19]  R. Radner PROCEEDINGS of the FOURTH BERKELEY SYMPOSIUM ON MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY , 2005 .

[20]  Rudolf Ahlswede,et al.  Common Randomness in Information Theory and Cryptography - Part II: CR Capacity , 1998, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[21]  Eyal Kushilevitz,et al.  Communication Complexity , 1997, Adv. Comput..