Variation in Leaf Reflectance Spectra Across the California Flora Partitioned by Evolutionary History, Geographic Origin, and Deep Time

Evolutionary relatedness underlies patterns of functional diversity in the natural world. Hyperspectral remote sensing has the potential to detect these patterns in plants through inherited patterns of leaf reflectance spectra. We collected leaf reflectance data across the California flora from plants grown in a common garden. Regions of the reflectance spectra vary in the depth and strength of phylogenetic signal. We also show that these differences are much greater than variation due to the geographic origin of the plant. At the phylogenetic extent of the California flora, spectral variation explained by the combination of ecotypic variation (divergent evolution) and convergent evolution of disparate lineages was minimal (3%–7%) but statistically significant. Interestingly, at the extent of a single genus (Arctostaphylos) no unique variation could be attributed to geographic origin. However, up to 18% of the spectral variation among Arctostaphylos individuals was shared between phylogeny and intraspecific variation stemming from ecotypic differences (i.e., geographic origin). Future studies could conduct more structured experiments (e.g., transplants or observations along environmental gradients) to disentangle these sources of variation and include other intraspecific variation (e.g., plasticity). We constrain broad‐scale spectral variability due to ecotypic sources, providing further support for the idea that phylogenetic clusters of species might be detectable through remote sensing. Phylogenetic clusters could represent a valuable dimension of biodiversity monitoring and detection.

[1]  Daniel M. Griffith,et al.  Representing plant diversity in land models: An evolutionary approach to make “Functional Types” more functional , 2021, Global change biology.

[2]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  NASA's surface biology and geology designated observable: A perspective on surface imaging algorithms , 2021 .

[3]  V. T. Parker,et al.  Allopatry, hybridization, and reproductive isolation in Arctostaphylos. , 2020, American journal of botany.

[4]  Daniel M. Griffith,et al.  Lineage-based functional types: characterising functional diversity to enhance the representation of ecological behaviour in Land Surface Models. , 2020, The New phytologist.

[5]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Leaf reflectance spectra capture the evolutionary history of seed plants , 2020, The New phytologist.

[6]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  Remote Sensing of Plant Biodiversity , 2020 .

[7]  B. Blonder,et al.  Remote sensing of ploidy level in quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) , 2019, Journal of Ecology.

[8]  Daniel M. Griffith,et al.  Editorial: Revisiting the Biome Concept With A Functional Lens , 2019, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[9]  Daniel M. Griffith,et al.  The ‘plantspec’ r package: A tool for spectral analysis of plant stoichiometry , 2019, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[10]  D. Tilman,et al.  Plant spectral diversity integrates functional and phylogenetic components of biodiversity and predicts ecosystem function , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[11]  Daniel M. Griffith,et al.  Herbivory and eutrophication mediate grassland plant nutrient responses across a global climatic gradient. , 2018, Ecology.

[12]  P. Peres‐Neto,et al.  Why phylogenies do not always predict ecological differences , 2017 .

[13]  William A. Freyman,et al.  Spatial phylogenetics of the native California flora , 2017, BMC Biology.

[14]  P. Townsend,et al.  Evolutionary Legacy Effects on Ecosystems: Biogeographic Origins, Plant Traits, and Implications for Management in the Era of Global Change , 2016 .

[15]  F. Rimet,et al.  phylosignal: an R package to measure, test, and explore the phylogenetic signal , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[16]  Aditya Singh,et al.  Associations of Leaf Spectra with Genetic and Phylogenetic Variation in Oaks: Prospects for Remote Detection of Biodiversity , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[17]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Biome Shifts and Niche Evolution in Plants , 2014 .

[18]  Pierre Hiernaux,et al.  Savanna Vegetation-Fire-Climate Relationships Differ Among Continents , 2014, Science.

[19]  Luis Cayuela,et al.  taxonstand: An r package for species names standardisation in vegetation databases , 2012 .

[20]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology , 2010, Bioinform..

[21]  J. Cavender-Bares,et al.  The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[22]  Maria A. Gandolfo,et al.  Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale , 2009, Nature.

[23]  Korbinian Strimmer,et al.  APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language , 2004, Bioinform..

[24]  T. Garland,et al.  TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  R. Clark,et al.  Reflectance spectroscopy: Quantitative analysis techniques for remote sensing applications , 1984 .

[26]  V. T. Parker,et al.  A PHYLOGENY OF ARCTOSTAPHYLOS (ERICACEAE) INFERRED FROM NUCLEAR RIBOSOMAL ITS SEQUENCES , 2016 .