A methodology for probabilistic real-time forecasting - an urban case study

The phenomenon of urban flooding due to rainfall exceeding the design capacity of drainage systems is a global problem and can have significant economic and social consequences. The complex nature of quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) from numerical weather prediction (NWP) models has facilitated a need to model and manage uncertainty. This paper presents a probabilistic approach for modelling uncertainty from single-valued QPFs at different forecast lead times. The uncertainty models in the form of probability distributions of rainfall forecasts combined with a sewer model is an important advancement in real-time forecasting at the urban scale. The methodological approach utilized in this paper involves a retrospective comparison between historical forecasted rainfall from a NWP model and observed rainfall from rain gauges from which conditional probability distributions of rainfall forecasts are derived. Two different sampling methods, respectively, a direct rainfall quantile approach and the Latin hypercube sampling-based method were used to determine the uncertainty in forecasted variables (water level, volume) for a test urban area, the city of Aarhus. The results show the potential for applying probabilistic rainfall forecasts and their subsequent use in urban drainage forecasting for estimation of prediction uncertainty.

[1]  Sara Liguori,et al.  Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting For A Small Urban Area: Use Of Radar Nowcasting , 2009 .

[2]  R. Khatibi,et al.  ACTIF best practice – Understanding and reducing uncertainty in flood forecasting , 2005 .

[3]  J. Schaake,et al.  Precipitation and temperature ensemble forecasts from single-value forecasts , 2007 .

[4]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[5]  Bill Ravens,et al.  An Introduction to Copulas , 2000, Technometrics.

[6]  Adrian J. Saul,et al.  Using probabilistic radar rainfall nowcasts and NWP forecasts for flow prediction in urban catchments , 2012 .

[7]  F. Pappenberger,et al.  Ignorance is bliss: Or seven reasons not to use uncertainty analysis , 2006 .

[8]  B. Russo,et al.  Real-time urban flood forecasting and modelling – a state of the art , 2013 .

[9]  R. Nelsen.  An Introduction to Copulas , 1998 .

[10]  R. Buizza,et al.  Flood forecasting using medium-range probabilistic weather prediction , 2005 .

[11]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Simulation of precipitation fields from probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecast , 2000 .

[12]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  Ensemble flood forecasting: a review. , 2009 .

[13]  Roman Krzysztofowicz,et al.  Transformation and normalization of variates with specified distributions , 1997 .

[14]  K. Beven,et al.  Development of a European flood forecasting system , 2003 .

[15]  Dennis J. Parker,et al.  An evaluation of flood forecasting, warning and response systems in the European Union , 1996 .

[16]  Julie Demargne,et al.  Generation of ensemble precipitation forecast from single-valued quantitative precipitation forecast for hydrologic ensemble prediction , 2011 .

[17]  Roman Krzysztofowicz,et al.  The case for probabilistic forecasting in hydrology , 2001 .

[18]  Jutta Thielen,et al.  Ensemble predictions and perceptions of risk, uncertainty, and error in flood forecasting , 2007 .

[19]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .