Diverse occupant behaviors and energy conservation opportunities for university student residences in Hong Kong

Abstract Occupant behavior significantly influences building energy consumption. However, two research gaps exist, namely, the lack of firsthand data for a complete understanding of the complex and stochastic nature of occupant behavior, and the limited consideration given to socio-psychological factors in the classification of behavior modes. This study aims to expand on the existing database of occupant behavior and propose an interdisciplinary classification framework of behavior modes. First, a hierarchy of behavior modes was developed considering occupants’ demand for comfort, preference for certain behavior, and energy dependence. Occupants were classified as “Active, Moderate, and Cautious” energy users. Then, the proposed “AMC” hierarchy was verified via a case study using a high-rise student residence in Hong Kong. Mixed methods were applied, including a questionnaire survey of 137 students, in-situ monitoring of adaptive behaviors using noninvasive sensors in 12 rooms, building energy simulation validated by full-season metered energy use data, and scenario analysis considering multifaceted factors. The results show that, interestingly, observable discrepancy of behavior patterns exists even among users of the same sort. Also, five key influencing factors, i.e. room orientation, floor, schedule, room temperature settings, and behavior modes of active, moderate and cautious users, explain 79% of the difference in cooling energy consumption, among which behavior modes induce the largest contribution. In addition, technical and socio-psychological barriers impede energy saving of active and moderate users. Although behavior changes may conserve up to 45% of cooling energy consumption, skillful selection of appropriate interventions is necessary in order to fulfill the expectancy.

[1]  Zoltán Nagy,et al.  Introducing IEA EBC annex 79: Key challenges and opportunities in the field of occupant-centric building design and operation , 2020, Building and Environment.

[2]  Zhen Bai,et al.  A Case Study on Household Electricity Uses and Their Variations Due to Occupant Behavior in Chinese Apartments in Beijing , 2015 .

[3]  Da Yan,et al.  Energy and behaviour at home: A review of intervention methods and practices , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[4]  Kathryn B. Janda,et al.  From “if only” to “social potential” in schemes to reduce building energy use , 2014 .

[5]  Tianzhen Hong,et al.  An ontology to represent energy-related occupant behavior in buildings. Part I: Introduction to the DNAs framework , 2015 .

[6]  Tianzhen Hong,et al.  A framework for quantifying the impact of occupant behavior on energy savings of energy conservation measures , 2017 .

[7]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[8]  Val Mitchell,et al.  Exploring Comfort in the Home: Towards an Interdisciplinary Framework for Domestic Comfort , 2012 .

[9]  Jian Yao,et al.  Modelling and simulating occupant behaviour on air conditioning in residential buildings , 2018, Energy and Buildings.

[10]  W. Pan,et al.  Multiple influencing factors analysis of household energy consumption in high-rise residential buildings: Evidence from Hong Kong , 2020 .

[11]  D. Schaffner,et al.  Rethinking social psychology and intervention design: A model of energy savings and human behavior , 2017 .

[12]  Gregory M. Morrison,et al.  The influence of design and everyday practices on individual heating and cooling behaviour in residential homes , 2018 .

[13]  A. Voinov,et al.  Demand-side solutions for climate mitigation: Bottom-up drivers of household energy behavior change in the Netherlands and Spain , 2020 .

[14]  W. Pan,et al.  Energy use of subtropical high-rise public residential buildings and impacts of energy saving measures , 2020 .

[15]  Mark A. Andor,et al.  Behavioral Economics and Energy Conservation – A Systematic Review of Non-price Interventions and Their Causal Effects , 2018, Ecological Economics.

[16]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[17]  Chuang Wang,et al.  Air-conditioning usage conditional probability model for residential buildings , 2014 .

[18]  Chuang Wang,et al.  A preliminary research on the derivation of typical occupant behavior based on large-scale questionnaire surveys , 2016 .

[19]  Yixing Chen,et al.  Occupant behavior models: A critical review of implementation and representation approaches in building performance simulation programs , 2018 .

[20]  Kaiyu Sun,et al.  A novel stochastic modeling method to simulate cooling loads in residential districts , 2017 .

[21]  B. Dong,et al.  A survey on energy consumption and energy usage behavior of households and residential building in urban China , 2017 .

[22]  E. Heiskanen,et al.  A critical review of energy behaviour change: The influence of context , 2019 .

[23]  Elie Azar,et al.  A systematic review of occupant behavior in building energy policy , 2020 .

[24]  R. Fazio Multiple Processes by which Attitudes Guide Behavior: The Mode Model as an Integrative Framework , 1990 .

[25]  Jin Zhou,et al.  Simulation-aided occupant-centric building design: A critical review of tools, methods, and applications , 2020, Energy and Buildings.

[26]  L. Giusti,et al.  Impact of building characteristics and occupants’ behaviour on the electricity consumption of households in Abu Dhabi (UAE) , 2017 .

[27]  Wei Pan,et al.  In-situ monitoring of occupant behavior in residential buildings ‒ a timely review , 2020 .

[28]  Ardeshir Mahdavi,et al.  Review of current trends in agent-based modeling of building occupants for energy and indoor-environmental performance analysis , 2020 .

[29]  Chuang Wang,et al.  A generalized probabilistic formula relating occupant behavior to environmental conditions , 2016 .

[30]  Won-Hwa Hong,et al.  Quantifying householder tolerance of thermal discomfort before turning on air-conditioner , 2020 .

[31]  W. O’Brien,et al.  An international review of occupant-related aspects of building energy codes and standards , 2020 .

[32]  Richard de Dear,et al.  Understanding patterns of adaptive comfort behaviour in the Sydney mixed-mode residential context , 2017 .

[33]  JuYoun Kwon,et al.  Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment , 2011 .

[34]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Variances in residential heating consumption – Importance of building characteristics and occupants analysed by movers and stayers , 2019, Applied Energy.

[35]  Standard Ashrae Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .

[36]  E. Erell,et al.  Modifying behaviour to save energy at home is harder than we think… , 2018, Energy and Buildings.

[37]  Shanyong Wang,et al.  Exploring the effects of non-cognitive and emotional factors on household electricity saving behavior , 2018 .

[38]  H. Burak Gunay,et al.  Improving occupant-related features in building performance simulation tools , 2018 .

[39]  A. Mahdavi Explanatory stories of human perception and behavior in buildings , 2020 .

[40]  A. Maslow Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[41]  A. Mahdavi,et al.  IEA EBC Annex 66: Definition and simulation of occupant behavior in buildings , 2017 .

[42]  Zhun Yu,et al.  Development and improvement of occupant behavior models towards realistic building performance simulation: A review , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[43]  W. L. Lee,et al.  Applying water cooled air conditioners in residential buildings in Hong Kong , 2008 .

[44]  Edward Ng,et al.  Improving the wind environment in high-density cities by understanding urban morphology and surface roughness: A study in Hong Kong , 2011, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[45]  Farrokh Jazizadeh,et al.  What drives our behaviors in buildings? A review on occupant interactions with building systems from the lens of behavioral theories , 2020 .