Functional Categories and Specific Language Impairment: A Case Study.

Children with specific language impairment (SLI) who are acquiring English often show a more serious deficit in grammatical morphology than in other areas of language. Because most grammatical morphemes appear to be associated with functional categories such as Determiner (Det), Comple? mentizer (Comp), and Inflection (Infl), these extraordinary deficits in gram? matical morphology might be attributable to a pronounced delay in the acquisition of these categories or to an underlying grammar that lacks them. In this article, we examined the status of the functional categories Det, Comp, and Infl in the grammar of one child with SLI seen at four ages: 3;9,4;3, 4;5, and 5;2. The results were consistent with an interpretation of a slowly developing grammar with elements from functional categories especially late in emergence and protracted in development.

[1]  P. A. Villiers,et al.  A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech , 1973, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[2]  R. Brown,et al.  A First Language , 1973 .

[3]  L. Leonard,et al.  The use of grammatical morphemes by normal and language-impaired children. , 1979, Journal of communication disorders.

[4]  L. Leonard Language Impairment in Children. , 1979 .

[5]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[6]  R S Chapman,et al.  The relation between age and mean length of utterance in morphemes. , 1981, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  Grammatical Morpheme Development in Three Language Disordered Children , 1983 .

[8]  George McCloskey,et al.  Leiter International Performance Scale , 1987 .

[9]  V. Volterra,et al.  Specific language impairment in children: A cross-linguistic study , 1987, Brain and Language.

[10]  Virginia Volterra,et al.  Some influences on the grammar of English- and Italian-speaking children with specific language impairment , 1988, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[11]  H. Clahsen,et al.  The grammatical characterization of developmental dysphasia , 1989 .

[12]  Laurence B. Leonard,et al.  Language learnability and specific language impairment in children , 1989, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[13]  Andrew Radford,et al.  The Syntax of Nominal Arguments in Early Child English , 1990 .

[14]  L. Leonard,et al.  Interpreting deficits in grammatical morphology in specifically language-impaired children: Preliminary evidence from Hebrew. , 1990, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[15]  Myrna Gopnik,et al.  Feature Blindness: A Case Study , 1990 .

[16]  M. Gopnik Feature-blind grammar and dysphasia , 1990, Nature.

[17]  D. Loeb,et al.  Subject case marking and verb morphology in normally developing and specifically language-impaired children. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[18]  J. Johnston,et al.  Grammatical morphology in language–impaired children acquiring English or German as their first language: A functional perspective , 1992, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[19]  D. Bishop,et al.  The underlying nature of specific language impairment. , 1992, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[20]  N. Hyams The Genesis of Clausal Structure , 1992 .

[21]  Laurence B. Leonard,et al.  Morphological Deficits in Children With Specific Language Impairment: The Status of Features in the Underlying Grammar , 1992 .

[22]  L. Leonard,et al.  The grammatical morphology of Hebrew-speaking children with specific language impairment: some competing hypotheses. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[23]  E. Clark,et al.  The Child's Path to Spoken Language. , 1994 .

[24]  M L Rice,et al.  Morphological deficits of children with SLI: evaluation of number marking and agreement. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[25]  M L Rice,et al.  Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.