Achieving a global objective with competing networked agents in the framework of discrete event systems

ABSTRACT This paper formulates a new control problem of achieving the global objective of a discrete event system with networked control agents that pursue only their own objectives and compete with each other. In this framework, each agent makes a decision to meet its own private objective with a given mask during state observation of the system and such a decision can be changed by the influence of other agents connected through a directed network. Agents with an initial decision of enabling or disabling of an event do not change their decision, but those agents reserving their decision in an undetermined way can change their decision to either enabling or disabling depending on the influence from other agents. We derive a condition for convergence of the decision of all agents. Based on the individual decision of each agent, the final decision for enabling or disabling of an event is made by majority rule. We present the network-controllability of a global objective with respect to a given mask set as a main condition with which the networked agents can meet the global objective while they pursue only their own private objectives.

[1]  Piotr Berman,et al.  A 2-Approximation Algorithm for the Undirected Feedback Vertex Set Problem , 1999, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[2]  J. Kwon,et al.  An MEG study of alpha modulation in patients with schizophrenia and in subjects at high risk of developing psychosis , 2011, Schizophrenia Research.

[3]  P. Ramadge,et al.  Supervisory control of a class of discrete event processes , 1987 .

[4]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Opinion Fluctuations and Disagreement in Social Networks , 2010, Math. Oper. Res..

[5]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  Analysis of feedback loops and robustness in network evolution based on Boolean models , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[6]  Richard M. Karp,et al.  Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems , 1972, 50 Years of Integer Programming.

[7]  B. Fiedler,et al.  Dynamics and control at feedback vertex sets. II: a faithful monitor to determine the diversity of molecular activities in regulatory networks. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  Stéphane Lafortune,et al.  A General Architecture for Decentralized Supervisory Control of Discrete-Event Systems , 2002, Discret. Event Dyn. Syst..

[9]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  The influence of the signal dynamics of activated form of IKK on NF‐κB and anti‐apoptotic gene expressions: A systems biology approach , 2006, FEBS letters.

[10]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  Modelling Spatially Regulated -Catenin Dynamics and Invasion inIntestinal Crypts , 2010 .

[11]  R. Thomas,et al.  Logical analysis of systems comprising feedback loops. , 1978, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  W. M. Wonham,et al.  Modular supervisory control of discrete-event systems , 1988, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[13]  R. Burt Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  Dynamics of biological systems: role of systems biology in medical research , 2006, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[15]  P. Van Mieghem,et al.  Virus Spread in Networks , 2009, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[16]  L. Glass,et al.  The logical analysis of continuous, non-linear biochemical control networks. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  Modelling spatially regulated beta-catenin dynamics and invasion in intestinal crypts. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Kurt Weyland,et al.  The Diffusion of Regime Contention in European Democratization, 1830-1940 , 2010 .

[19]  Claudio Altafini,et al.  Consensus Problems on Networks With Antagonistic Interactions , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[20]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  Inferring gene regulatory networks from temporal expression profiles under time-delay and noise , 2007, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[21]  Toke S. Aidt,et al.  Workers of the World, Unite! Franchise Extensions and the Threat of Revolution in Europe, 1820-1938 , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[22]  J. Aracena Maximum Number of Fixed Points in Regulatory Boolean Networks , 2008, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[23]  P. Ramadge,et al.  Modular Supervisory Control of Discrete Event Systems , 1988 .

[24]  P. Ingram,et al.  The Global Rise of Democracy , 2010 .

[25]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  Discovery of a kernel for controlling biomolecular regulatory networks , 2013, Scientific Reports.