Common carotid intima-media thickness in cardiovascular risk stratification of older people: the Rotterdam Study

Aim: Non-invasive measures of atherosclerosis, such as carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), may improve global cardiovascular risk prediction. The aim of this study was to determine whether common carotid IMT in addition to traditional risk factors improves risk classification in a general population of older people. Methods and results: A group of 3580 non-diabetic people aged 55–75 years and free of cardiovascular disease at baseline were followed for a median time of 12.2 years. Compared to models based on Framingham risk factors, we studied the ability of common cIMT measurement to better classify people into categories of low (<10%), intermediate (10–20%) and high (>20%) 10-year risk of hard coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke. In older men, addition of cIMT to Framingham risk factors did not improve prediction of hard CHD or stroke. In older women, addition of cIMT to Framingham risk factors significantly improved risk classification. cIMT improved the C-statistic of the model for hard CHD from 0.711 to 0.719 and for stroke from 0.712 to 0.721, at good calibration. Reclassification was least in the majority of women classified as low risk (4% (n = 76) for hard CHD and 3% (n = 62) for stroke) and most substantial in women at intermediate risk (43% (n = 70) for hard CHD and 28% (n = 76) for stroke). The net reclassification improvement in women was 8.2% (p = 0.03) for hard CHD and 8.0% (p = 0.06) for stroke. Conclusion: cIMT had some additional value beyond traditional risk factors in the cardiovascular risk stratification of older women, but not of older men.

[1]  R B D'Agostino,et al.  Stroke risk profile: adjustment for antihypertensive medication. The Framingham Study. , 1994, Stroke.

[2]  P Ducimetière,et al.  Common carotid intima-media thickness predicts occurrence of carotid atherosclerotic plaques: longitudinal results from the Aging Vascular Study (EVA) study. , 2000, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[3]  Mark A. Hlatky,et al.  ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring By Computed Tomography in Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and in Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain , 2007 .

[4]  Saskia le Cessie,et al.  Use of Framingham risk score and new biomarkers to predict cardiovascular mortality in older people: population based observational cohort study , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  F. Harrell REGRESSION MODELING STRATEGIES WITH APPLICATION TO LOGISTIC REGRESSION , 2005 .

[6]  Diederick E. Grobbee,et al.  Carotid intima-media thickness measurement in cardiovascular screening programmes , 2009, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[7]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[8]  J. Mckenney,et al.  Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). , 2001, JAMA.

[9]  N. Cook Use and Misuse of the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in Risk Prediction , 2007, Circulation.

[10]  N. Cook,et al.  Reclassification Calculations for Persons With Incomplete Follow-up , 2010 .

[11]  A. Hofman,et al.  Determinants of disease and disability in the elderly: The Rotterdam elderly study , 1991, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[12]  Helmuth Steinmetz,et al.  Is carotid intima media thickness useful for individual prediction of cardiovascular risk? Ten-year results from the Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study (CAPS). , 2010, European heart journal.

[13]  M. Budoff,et al.  Framingham risk equation underestimates subclinical atherosclerosis risk in asymptomatic women. , 2006, Atherosclerosis.

[14]  S M Grundy,et al.  Improving coronary heart disease risk assessment in asymptomatic people: role of traditional risk factors and noninvasive cardiovascular tests. , 2001, Circulation.

[15]  Frank E. Harrell,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2001 .

[16]  Arno W. Hoes,et al.  Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study. , 1997, Circulation.

[17]  A. Hofman,et al.  Is Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Useful in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment?: The Rotterdam Study , 2001, Stroke.

[18]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Validity of the Framingham point scores in the elderly: results from the Rotterdam study. , 2007, American heart journal.

[19]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary. , 2007, Atherosclerosis.

[20]  Monique M. B. Breteler,et al.  The Rotterdam Study: 2016 objectives and design update , 2015, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[21]  Matthias W. Lorenz,et al.  Prediction of Clinical Cardiovascular Events With Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2007, Circulation.

[22]  H. Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. , 2003, European heart journal.

[23]  J. Mckenney,et al.  National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) , 2002 .

[24]  Eric Boerwinkle,et al.  Carotid intima-media thickness and presence or absence of plaque improves prediction of coronary heart disease risk: the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.