Identity Adaptiveness: Affect Across Multiple Identities

Most empirical work that examines the effects of stereotypes on targets considers only one of a target's many social identities. This study examined how individuals implicitly affectively orient themselves toward their social identities in situations in which one or another of these identities is relatively adaptive. An adaptive identity is one associated with stereotypes that predict desirable performance in a given context. One hundred and twenty-one Asian American females generated ethnicity- and gender-related memories in contexts in which their gender identity was relatively adaptive, their ethnic identity was relatively adaptive, or neither identity was relatively adaptive. Self-reported affect expressed in these memories was analyzed. In a context in which their ethnic identity was adaptive, participants generated more positive ethnicity-related memories than gender-related memories. In contrast, in a context in which their gender identity was adaptive, participants generated more positive gender-related memories than ethnicity-related memories. When neither identity was adaptive participants expressed similar affect toward both. Similar results were found when blind raters coded memory affect. Findings suggest that stereotypes and different social contexts do not simply result in targets' “identification” or “disidentification” along a single dimension of identity, but rather prompt a reorientation of implicit affect across their multiple identities.

[1]  N. Ambady,et al.  Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance , 1999 .

[2]  N. Ambady,et al.  Will a Category Cue Affect You? Category Cues, Positive Stereotypes and Reviewer Recall for Applicants , 2000 .

[3]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Why minority group members perceive or do not perceive the discrimination that confronts them: the role of self-esteem and perceived control. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  C. Steele.  A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[5]  A. Tesser,et al.  Advanced social psychology , 1995 .

[6]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation , 1990 .

[7]  M. Brewer.  The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[8]  M. Banaji,et al.  Implicit stereotyping and prejudice. , 1994 .

[9]  R. Baumeister.  Self-esteem : the puzzle of low self-regard , 1993 .

[10]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  The Nonverbal Mediation of Self-Fulfilling Prophecies in Interracial Interaction. , 1974 .

[11]  J. Crocker,et al.  Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. , 1989 .

[12]  S. Fordham,et al.  Racelessness as a Factor in Black Students' School Success: Pragmatic Strategy or Pyrrhic Victory? , 1988 .

[13]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[14]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Social Identity Theory's Self-Esteem Hypothesis: A Review and Some Suggestions for Clarification , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[15]  P. Linville,et al.  Self-complexity as a cognitive buffer against stress-related illness and depression. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  S. Spencer,et al.  Low Self-Esteem: The Uphill Struggle for Self-Integrity , 1993 .

[17]  T. Wills.  Downward Comparison Principles in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[18]  William J. McGuire,et al.  Effects of household sex composition on the salience of one's gender in the spontaneous self-concept. , 1979 .

[19]  P. Linville,et al.  Self-complexity and affective extremity: Don't put all of your eggs in one cognitive basket. , 1985 .

[20]  Dominic Abrams,et al.  Processes of social identification , 1992 .

[21]  C. Steele,et al.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  M. Banaji,et al.  Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. , 1995, Psychological review.

[23]  S. E. Taylor,et al.  Social comparison activity under threat: downward evaluation and upward contacts. , 1989, Psychological review.

[24]  B. Levy.  Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[26]  M. Brewer.  A dual process model of impression formation. , 1988 .

[27]  T. K. Srull,et al.  A Dual process model of impression formation , 1988 .

[28]  C. Steele.  The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self , 1988 .

[29]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Theory and Research Concerning Social Comparisons of Personal Attributes , 2001 .

[30]  S. Fordham,et al.  Black students' school success: Coping with the “burden of ‘acting white’” , 1986 .

[31]  W. Mcguire,et al.  Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one's ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  J Tudor-Hart,et al.  On the nature of prejudice. , 1961, The Eugenics review.

[33]  G. Āllport.  Prejudice: Is it societal or personal? , 1963 .

[34]  M. Rosenberg,et al.  Social Psychology of the Self Concept , 1982 .

[35]  C. Stangor,et al.  Prejudice : the target's perspective , 1999 .

[36]  Joshua Aronson,et al.  Stereotype threat and the academic underperformance of minorities and women. , 1998 .