Long-term safety and efficacy of treatment with subcutaneous abatacept in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are methotrexate inadequate responders

Abstract Objective. To assess the long-term safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) abatacept in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were MTX inadequate responders, in a long-term extension (LTE) to a double-dummy, double-blind study (NCT01001832). Methods. Patients, who had previously received SC or intravenous (IV) abatacept with MTX (6–8 mg/week) for 24 weeks, received SC abatacept (125 mg/week) with MTX for an additional 52 weeks. Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy were assessed. Results. The LTE included 112 patients. SC abatacept was generally well tolerated in the LTE, with no new safety signals. American College of Rheumatology 20, 50, and 70 response rates, disease activity score 28 (C-reactive protein) remission rates (< 2.6), and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index response rates (≥ 0.3 improvement from baseline) achieved at the end of the double-blind period were maintained over the LTE and were comparable in patients who received SC or IV abatacept in the double-blind period. Seropositivity for immunogenicity occurred in 4 (3.6%) patients. Self-injection of SC abatacept was well controlled and not associated with additional safety events. Conclusions. SC abatacept had acceptable safety and was well tolerated and effective over the LTE (76 weeks in total), with low rates of immunogenicity in Japanese patients.

[1]  T. Takeuchi,et al.  Efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of abatacept administered subcutaneously or intravenously in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: a Phase II/III, randomized study , 2014, Modern rheumatology.

[2]  H. Yamanaka,et al.  AB0435 Effects of Prior Use of BIOLOGICS on the Safety and Effectiveness of Abatacept Administered with or without Methotrexate in Japanese Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Sub-Analysis of the Abatacept All-Cases Post-Marketing Surveillance , 2014 .

[3]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  Head-to-head comparison of subcutaneous abatacept versus adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis: two-year efficacy and safety findings from AMPLE trial , 2013, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[4]  H. Hashimoto,et al.  Tolerability and efficacy of abatacept in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a phase I study , 2013, Modern rheumatology.

[5]  T. Takeuchi,et al.  THU0125 A multi-center, double-dummy, double-blind study of subcutaneous (SC) abatacept (ABA) compared with intraveneous (IV) ABA in japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to methotrexate , 2013 .

[6]  M. Genovese,et al.  Immunogenicity, Safety, and Efficacy of Abatacept Administered Subcutaneously With or Without Background Methotrexate in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From a Phase III, International, Multicenter, Parallel‐Arm, Open‐Label Study , 2013, Arthritis care & research.

[7]  S. Nadler,et al.  Advances in CTLA-4-Ig-mediated modulation of inflammatory cell and immune response activation in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2013, Autoimmunity reviews.

[8]  N. Miyasaka,et al.  Phase II dose–response study of abatacept in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate , 2013, Modern rheumatology.

[9]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  Head-to-head comparison of subcutaneous abatacept versus adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis: Findings of a phase IIIb, multinational, prospective, randomized study , 2013, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  M. Weinblatt,et al.  Head-to-head comparison of subcutaneous abatacept versus adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis : two-year ef fi cacy and safety fi ndings from AMPLE trial , 2013 .

[11]  J. Kremer,et al.  Abatacept in subjects who switch from intravenous to subcutaneous therapy: results from the phase IIIb ATTUNE study , 2012, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  I. Strusberg,et al.  Evaluation of abatacept administered subcutaneously in adults with active rheumatoid arthritis: impact of withdrawal and reintroduction on immunogenicity, efficacy and safety (phase Iiib ALLOW study) , 2011, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[13]  M. Genovese,et al.  Subcutaneous Abatacept vErsus Intravenous Abatacept: A Phase IIIb Noninferiority Study in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate , 2011, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[14]  M. Genovese,et al.  Safety profile of subcutaneous abatacept focusing on clinically relevant events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and up to 4.5 years of exposure , 2011 .

[15]  A. Cope,et al.  The central role of T cells in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2007, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[16]  H. Schellekens Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins. , 2003, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[17]  Stanley B. Cohen,et al.  Costimulatory blockade in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot, dose-finding, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating CTLA-4Ig and LEA29Y eighty-five days after the first infusion. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[18]  N. Rege,et al.  ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: guideline for good clinical practice. , 2001, Journal of postgraduate medicine.

[19]  N. N. Available World medical association declaration of Helsinki , 2000, Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine.

[20]  H. V. van Lier,et al.  Assessment of pain after subcutaneous injection of erythropoietin in patients receiving haemodialysis. , 1991, BMJ.