The dipole flow test: A new single‐borehole test for aquifer characterization

A new single-borehole measurement technique for confined aquifers, the dipole flow test, yields the vertical distributions of the horizontal hydraulic conductivity, the vertical hydraulic conductivity, and the specific storativity when applied to different borehole intervals. The test utilizes straddle packers to isolate two chambers in the borehole, pressure transducers to monitor drawdown in them, and a small pump to create a dipole flow pattern in the aquifer by pumping water at a constant rate from the aquifer into one chamber, transferring it within the well to the next chamber, and finally injecting it back to the aquifer. A mathematical model describing the drawdown in each chamber is derived for the transient as well as the steady state cases. The aquifer parameters may be estimated from data produced by the dipole flow test alone or in conjunction with conventional pumping tests. The dipole flow regime reaches a steady state relatively quickly, especially in well permeable aquifers. A robust computational methodology for estimating the aquifer parameters, suitable for automatization, is based on the Newton-Raphson algorithm applied to a system of up to three nonlinear equations, each describing the well drawdown at a different judiciously chosen time. Due to the relatively small drawdownmore » it invokes, the dipole flow test may be applicable to unconfined aquifers as well.« less

[1]  G. Moltyaner Mixing cup and through-the-wall measurements in field-scale tracer tests and their related scales of averaging , 1987 .

[2]  Lynn W. Gelhar,et al.  Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to applications , 1986 .

[3]  B. Herrling,et al.  Hydraulic Circulation System for In Situ Bioreclamation and/or In Situ Remediation of Strippable Contamination , 1991 .

[4]  Ulrich Schimschal,et al.  FLOWMETER ANALYSIS AT RAFT RIVER, IDAHO , 1981 .

[5]  Frederick L. Paillet,et al.  Determining the Distribution of Hydraulic Conductivity in a Fractured Limestone Aquifer by Simultaneous Injection and Geophysical Logging , 1988 .

[6]  A. Moench,et al.  A numerical inversion of the laplace transform solution to radial dispersion in a porous medium , 1981 .

[7]  C. Axness,et al.  Three‐dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers , 1983 .

[8]  R. G. Nisle The Effect of Partial Penetration on Pressure Build-Up in Oil Wells , 1958 .

[9]  L. Smith Spatial variability of flow parameters in a stratified sand , 1981 .

[10]  Fred J. Molz,et al.  An Analysis Technique for Multilevel and Partially Penetrating Slug Test Data , 1990 .

[11]  G. Dagan Solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  G. Kruseman,et al.  Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data , 1983 .

[13]  R. C. Earlougher Advances in Well Test Analysis , 1977 .

[14]  Curtis F. Gerald Applied numerical analysis , 1970 .

[15]  J. Pickens,et al.  Scale‐dependent dispersion in a stratified granular aquifer , 1981 .

[16]  H. H. Cooper,et al.  Drawdown in a well of large diameter , 1967 .

[17]  W. A. Burns,et al.  New Single-Well Test for Determining Vertical Permeability , 1969 .

[18]  A. Mercado,et al.  Determining the average porosity and permeability of a stratified aquifer with the aid of radioactive tracers , 1966 .

[19]  W. Keys,et al.  Role of borehole geophysics in defining the physical characteristics of the Raft River geothermal reservoir, Idaho , 1979 .

[20]  F. Molz,et al.  Multilevel Slug Tests with Comparisons to Tracer Data , 1991 .

[21]  D. T. Chafin,et al.  Selected drill-stem test data for the Upper Colorado River basin , 1986 .

[22]  P. Hufschmied Die Ermittlung der Durchlässigkeit von Lockergesteins-Grundwasserleitern , 1983 .

[23]  Fred J. Molz,et al.  The Impeller Meter for measuring aquifer permeability variations: Evaluation and comparison with other tests , 1989 .

[24]  E. Sudicky A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: Spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and its role in the dispersion process , 1986 .

[25]  D. A. Barry,et al.  On the Dagan Model of solute transport in groundwater: Foundational aspects , 1987 .

[26]  Evaluation of methods for determining the vertical distribution of hydraulic conductivity , 1990 .

[27]  D. K. Babu,et al.  Flow to a Partially Penetrating Well in a Double‐Porosity Reservoir , 1984 .

[28]  Fred Marinelli,et al.  Performance and Analysis of Drillstem Tests in Small-Diameter Boreholes , 1985 .

[29]  A. Moench,et al.  Transient Flow to a Large‐Diameter Well in an Aquifer With Storative Semiconfining Layers , 1985 .

[30]  George J. Hirasaki Pulse Tests and Other Early Transient Pressure Analyses for In-Situ Estimation of Vertical Permeability , 1974 .

[31]  R. Lai,et al.  Nonsteady flow to a large well in a leaky aquifer , 1974 .

[32]  P. Hufschmied,et al.  Measuring hydraulic conductivity with the borehole flowmeter , 1989 .

[33]  Hantush Drawdown Around a Partially Penetrating Well , 1961 .

[34]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Pressure testing of fractured rocks - a methodology employing three-dimensional cross-hole tests , 1983 .

[35]  K. Novakowski Analysis of pulse interference tests , 1989 .

[36]  F. Molz,et al.  Forced-Gradient Tracer Tests and Inferred Hydraulic Conductivity Distributions at the Mobile Site , 1988 .

[37]  Z. J. Kabala,et al.  A stochastic model of reactive solute transport with time‐varying velocity in a heterogeneous aquifer , 1991 .

[38]  M. S. Hantush Hydraulics of Wells , 1964 .

[39]  Edwin P. Weeks,et al.  Determining the Ratio of Horizontal to Vertical Permeability by Aquifer‐Test Analysis , 1969 .

[40]  Alfred E. Hess,et al.  Identifying hydraulically conductive fractures with a slow-velocity borehole flowmeter , 1986 .

[41]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  Theory of Solute Transport by Groundwater , 1987 .