Effects of Automation on Situation Awareness in Controlling Robot Teams

Declines in situation awareness (SA) often accompany automation. Some of these effects have been characterized as out-of-the-loop, complacency, and automation bias. Increasing autonomy in multi-robot control might be expected to produce similar declines in operators’ SA. In this paper we review a series of experiments in which automation is introduced in controlling robot teams. Automating path planning at a foraging task improved both target detection and localization which is closely tied to SA. Timing data, however, suggested small declines in SA for robot location and pose. Automation of image acquisition, by contrast, led to poorer localization. Findings are discussed and alternative explanations involving shifts in strategy proposed.

[1]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[2]  John W. Senders,et al.  The Human Operator as a Monitor and Controller of Multidegree of Freedom Systems , 1964 .

[3]  Stefano Carpin,et al.  Quantitative Assessments of USARSim Accuracy , 2006 .

[4]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Ecological displays for robot interaction: a new perspective , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[5]  Dal Vernon C. Reising,et al.  Functional versus Schematic Overview Displays: Impact on Operator Situation Awareness in Process Monitoring , 2010 .

[6]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Validating human-robot interaction schemes in multitasking environments , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[7]  D A Norman,et al.  The 'problem' with automation: inappropriate feedback and interaction, not 'over-automation'. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  Arnoud Visser,et al.  Towards heterogeneous robot teams for disaster mitigation: Results and performance metrics from RoboCup rescue , 2007, J. Field Robotics.

[9]  Marco Fratarcangeli,et al.  A 3D Simulator of Multiple Legged Robots Based on USARSim , 2006, RoboCup.

[10]  Renwick E. Curry,et al.  Flight-deck automation: promises and problems , 1980 .

[11]  Michael Lewis,et al.  Human vs. Algorithmic Path Planning for Search and Rescue by Robot Teams , 2010 .

[12]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Richard Volpe.  Navigation Results from Desert Field Tests of the Rocky 7 Mars Rover Prototype , 1999, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[14]  J. R. Murphy.  Application of panospheric imaging to a teleoperated lunar rover , 1995, 1995 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Intelligent Systems for the 21st Century.

[15]  John A. Wise.  Aviation Automation: The Search for a Human-Centered Approach by Charles E. Billings 1997, 355 pages, $36.00 (pbk.). $69.95 (hbk.) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates ISBN 0-8058-2127-9 , 1998 .

[16]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Performance Consequences of Automation-Induced 'Complacency' , 1993 .

[17]  Andreas Birk,et al.  High Fidelity Tools for Rescue Robotics: Results and Perspectives , 2005, RoboCup.

[18]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[19]  C. Scrapper,et al.  Robot simulation physics validation , 2007, PerMIS.

[20]  F. Matsuno,et al.  Study on effective camera images for mobile robot teleoperation , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[21]  Mark Fiala.  Pano-presence for teleoperation , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[22]  Mustapha Mouloua,et al.  Effects of Adaptive Task Allocation on Monitoring of Automated Systems , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[23]  S. Balakirsky,et al.  Design and validation of a Whegs robot in USARSim , 2007 .

[24]  Prasanna Velagapudi,et al.  How search and its subtasks scale in N robots , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[25]  Alex Fukunaga,et al.  Cooperative mobile robotics: antecedents and directions , 1995 .

[26]  Prasanna Velagapudi,et al.  Synchronous vs. Asynchronous Video in Multi-robot Search , 2008, First International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction.

[27]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration , 2010, Hum. Factors.

[28]  Stefano Carpin,et al.  Validating USARsim for use in HRI Research , 2005 .

[29]  Ronald L. Boring,et al.  "Turn Off the Television!": Real-World Robotic Exploration Experiments with a Virtual 3-D Display , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.