Enhancement of Human Performance in Manual Target Acquisition and Tracking

Abstract : This report presents a review and analysis of research literature pertaining to human performance in manual target acquisition and tracking tasks. The emphasis of the review is the identification of factors which enhance performance, particularly those related to training and practice. Three major areas are reviewed: 1) typical patterns of performance in simple target acquisition and tracking tasks; 2) the effects of various training and practice regimens on the development of tracking proficiency; and 3) the impact of dual- tasks conditions on performance of tracking tasks. A framework for interpreting the various theoretical constructs and empirical findings covered in the literature is offered. This framework is based on the general notion of response organization, and embraces both the process of organization and the result of that process. A major issue which has not been addressed in the research literature is how the impact of dual-task conditions on response organization may be lessened (or recovery hastened) by appropriate training. An experiments was conducted to address this issue. The whole-task condition of interest was one in which a primary tracking task was first performed along, followed by concurrent performance of the primary task and a simple target acquisition task. Three groups of subjects were given different training programs for the whole task. One group was given whole-task training; that is, they practiced the task in training exactly as it was performed in transfer conditions.

[1]  C. Noble,et al.  Acquisition of pursuit tracking skill under extended training as a joint function of sex and initial ability. , 1970 .

[2]  E. C. Poulton,et al.  Tracking skill and manual control , 1974 .

[3]  W. D. Garvey A comparison of the effects of training and secondary tasks on tracking behavior. , 1960 .

[4]  Gavan Lintern,et al.  Part-Task Training for Tracking and Manual Control , 1985 .

[5]  B WEISS The role of proprioceptive feedback in positioning responses. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  R. W. Pew,et al.  Human perceptual-motor performance , 1974 .

[7]  M. Hammerton THE COMPONENTS OF ACQUISITION TIME , 1964 .

[8]  D. Trumbo,et al.  The organization of skilled response , 1967 .

[9]  H. P. Bahrick An analysis of stimulus variables influencing the prprioceptive control of movements. , 1957, Psychological review.

[10]  G E BRIGGS,et al.  Learning curves; facts or artifacts? , 1957, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  L. Cronbach The two disciplines of scientific psychology. , 1957 .

[12]  G E BRIGGS,et al.  The relative efficiency of several training methods as a function of transfer task complexity. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  M A VINCE,et al.  Corrective Movements in a Pursuit Task 1 , 1948, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[14]  J. S. Brown,et al.  Discrete movements in the horizontal plane as a function of their length and direction. , 1949, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  J. A. Adams,et al.  The relationship between certain measures of ability and the acquisition of a psychomotor criterion response. , 1957, The Journal of general psychology.

[16]  R. Pew Acquisition of hierarchical control over the temporal organization of a skill. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  D Trumbo,et al.  Task predictability and the development of tracking skill under extended practice. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  E A FLEISHMAN,et al.  Abilities at different stages of practice in rotary pursuit performance. , 1960, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  Poulton Ec,et al.  Learning the statistical properties of the input in pursuit tracking. , 1957 .

[20]  Edwin A. Fleishman,et al.  Changes in factor structure of a complex psychomotor test as a function of practice , 1954 .

[21]  Charles R. Kelley,et al.  What is Adaptive Training?1 , 1969 .

[22]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.