Towards high frequency electromagnetic induction sensing of soil apparent electrical conductivity

Electromagnetic properties of soil (electrical conductivity, dielectric permittivity, and magnetic susceptibility) depend on its physical and chemical properties that are of interest to applications such as precision agriculture or environmental monitoring. State-of-the-art electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensors operate in the lower frequency range well below 100 kHz in which they are most sensitive to the magnetic susceptibility of the soil, and to a lesser degree to its electrical conductivity. In addition to such EMI sensors, the ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is often employed for the dielectric permittivity mapping at the frequencies above several tens of megahertz. The EMI soil sensing in the higher frequency range from 1 MHz to 20 MHz can bridge the gap between the EMI sensors in the low frequency range and the GPR. In this frequency range, both electrical conductivity and dielectric permittivity of the soil affect the measurement. In this paper, we present a simple EMI sensor operating in the range between 1 MHz and 10 MHz with an estimated resolution of 15 mS/m. We evaluate the sensor sensitivity to the electrical conductivity and discuss the influences of the dielectric permittivity and liftoff. We compare the conductivity measurements with the presented analytical sensor model.

[1]  Walter L. Anderson,et al.  Shallow subsurface mapping by electromagnetic sounding in the 300 kHz to 30 MHz range: Model studies and prototype system assessment , 1994 .

[2]  Vedran Bilas,et al.  Automatic compensation of primary field coupling for a frequency-domain electromagnetic induction sensor , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC).

[3]  D. Corwin,et al.  Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture , 2005 .

[4]  Benjamin Barrowes,et al.  High-Frequency Electromagnetic Induction (HFEMI) Sensor Results from IED Constituent Parts , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[5]  Theodoros Theodoulidis,et al.  Series expansions in eddy current nondestructive evaluation models , 2005 .

[6]  E. Brevik,et al.  The use of electromagnetic induction techniques in soils studies , 2014 .

[7]  Vedran Bilas,et al.  Comparative Study of Planar Coil EMI Sensors for Inversion-Based Detection of Buried Objects , 2020, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[8]  Theodoros Theodoulidis,et al.  Eddy current canonical problems (with applications to nondestructive evaluation) , 2006 .

[9]  Vedran Bilas,et al.  Robust Estimation of Metal Target Shape Using Time-Domain Electromagnetic Induction Data , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[10]  Fayçal Rejiba,et al.  Medium-frequency electromagnetic device to measure electric conductivity and dielectric permittivity of soils , 2016 .

[11]  J. D. Mcneill Electromagnetic Terrain Conduc-tivity Measurement at Low Induction Numbers , 1980 .

[12]  David Beamish,et al.  Fundamentals of the capacitive resistivity technique , 2006 .

[13]  A. Tabbagh,et al.  SIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENT OF ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY AND DIELECTRIC PERMITTIVITY OF SOILS USING A SLINGRAM ELECTROMAGNETIC DEVICE IN MEDIUM FREQUENCY RANGE , 1994 .

[14]  Tim Munday,et al.  The importance of including conductivity and dielectric permittivity information when processing low-frequency GPR and high-frequency EMI data sets , 2013 .

[15]  Vedran Bilas,et al.  Analytical modelling of soil effects on electromagnetic induction sensor for humanitarian demining , 2013 .