The European Forum on Integrated Environmental Assessment

Integrated Environmental Assessment (IEA) can be loosely defined as policy‐relevant, multidisciplinary research on environmental issues. Many, diverse activities in this broad field are ongoing, but the approaches lack the structure, standardization and quality control common in disciplinary research. IEA has three stages: “structuring the problem”, “analyzing the problem” and “communicating the findings and insights”. Each stage has its inherent difficulties, not least because problem definition and analysis are neither separable nor unambiguous nor unique. Difficulties are exacerbated in the first and third stages by the necessity for science and policy to work together. Difficulties are exacerbated in the second stage by the necessity of different scientific disciplines to cooperate. The European Forum on Integrated Environmental Assessment is an initiative to improve scientific quality and policy‐relevance of IEA, by organizing two series of workshops, one looking in detail at current and desired scientific practices, the other reviewing current and establishing further applications of IEA to environmental issues in Europe.

[1]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  Integrated assessment modeling of global climate change: Transparent rational tool for policy making or opaque screen hiding value‐laden assumptions? , 1997 .

[2]  Marshall A. Wise,et al.  ADVANCED ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND CLIMATE CHANGE: AN ANALYSIS USING THE GLOBAL CHANGE ASSESSMENT MODEL (GCAM) , 1994 .

[3]  Stephen C. Peck,et al.  Optimal carbon emissions trajectories when damages depend on the rate or level of global warming , 1994 .

[4]  Marjolein B.A. van Asselt,et al.  Uncertainty in integrated assessment: A social scientific perspective , 1996 .

[5]  Jerzy A. Filar,et al.  The image greenhouse model as a mathematical system , 1994 .

[6]  M. Thompson.  Cultural Theory and integrated assessment , 1997 .

[7]  Ian H. Rowlands,et al.  Valuing climate change: the economics of the greenhouse , 1995 .

[8]  Leen Hordijk,et al.  Integrated assessment models as a basis for air pollution negotiations , 1995 .

[9]  Hideo Harasawa,et al.  Asian-Pacific integrated model for evaluating policy options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and global warming impacts , 1995 .

[10]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Rolling the ‘DICE’: an optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases , 1993 .

[11]  Erica L. Plambeck,et al.  The model: Integrating the science and economics of global warming , 1997 .

[12]  Stephen C. Peck,et al.  CO2 emissions control : Comparing policy instruments , 1993 .

[13]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  On the optimal control of carbon dioxide emissions: an application of FUND , 1997 .

[14]  Stephen C. Peck,et al.  Optimal CO2 control policy with stochastic losses from temperature rise , 1995 .

[15]  J. Alcamo,et al.  The RAINS Model of Acidification: Science and Strategies in Europe , 1990 .

[16]  Chris Hope,et al.  PAGE95: An updated valuation of the impacts of global warming , 1996 .

[17]  Anand Patwardhan,et al.  Assessing integrated assessments , 1996 .

[18]  M. Parry,et al.  The potential effects of climate change in the United Kingdom. , 1992 .

[19]  Edward A. Parson,et al.  Informing global environmental policy‐making: A plea for new methods of assessment and synthesis , 1997 .

[20]  J. Rotmans.  Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead , 1998 .

[21]  J. Alcamo.  IMAGE 2.0 : integrated modeling of global climate change , 1994 .

[22]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Estimating the costs of mitigating greenhouse gases , 1996 .

[23]  C. Hope,et al.  Policy analysis of the greenhouse effect: An application of the PAGE model , 1993 .

[24]  W. Nordhaus.  Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change , 1994 .

[25]  M. Granger Morgan,et al.  Learning from integrated assessment of climate change , 1996 .

[26]  David Maddison,et al.  A cost-benefit analysis of slowing climate change , 1995 .

[27]  R. Giering,et al.  Sensitivity Study of Optimal CO2 Emission Paths Using a Simplified Structural Integrated Assessment Model (SIAM) , 1997 .

[28]  Stewart J. Cohen.  Scientist–stakeholder collaboration in integrated assessment of climate change: lessons from a case study of Northwest Canada , 1997 .

[29]  M. Benarie.  The RAINS model of acidification: edited by J. Alcamo, R. Shaw and L. Hordijk, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands 1990, 402 pp. Price: Dfl. 200.00, US$ 117.50 , 1991 .

[30]  Edward A. Parson,et al.  Three dilemmas in the integrated assessment of climate change , 1996 .

[31]  R.S.J. Tol.  The Social Cost Controversy: A Personal Appraisal , 1997 .

[32]  Hordijk.  The rains model of acidification , 1990 .

[33]  Jill Jäger,et al.  Current thinking on using scientific findings in environmental policy making , 1998 .

[34]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Image: An Integrated Model to Assess the Greenhouse Effect , 1990 .

[35]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  The Greenhouse Debate: Econonmic Efficiency, Burden Sharing and Hedging Strategies , 1995 .

[36]  David G. Streets,et al.  Energy use, emissions, and air pollution reduction strategies in Asia , 1995 .

[37]  Edward A. Parson,et al.  Integrated assessment and environmental policy making: In pursuit of usefulness , 1995 .

[38]  Hadi Dowlatabadi,et al.  A model framework for integrated studies of the climate problem , 1993 .

[39]  Michael Grubb,et al.  The economics of changing course : Implications of adaptability and inertia for optimal climate policy , 1995 .

[40]  Stephen C. Peck,et al.  International CO2 emissions targets and timetables: An analysis of the AOSIS proposal , 1996 .

[41]  T. Teisberg,et al.  CETA: A Model for Carbon Emissions Trajectory Assessment , 1992 .

[42]  M. Leimbach.  Development of a Fuzzy optimization model, supporting global warming decision-making , 1996 .

[43]  W. Nordhaus.  An Optimal Transition Path for Controlling Greenhouse Gases , 1992, Science.

[44]  Joseph Alcamo,et al.  IMAGE 2.0 , 1899 .

[45]  L. Hordijk,et al.  Integrated assessment models for acid rain , 1997 .

[46]  Erling Berge,et al.  Transboundary air pollution in Europe , 1997 .

[47]  Nigel Haigh,et al.  Roundtable 4: Challenges and opportunities for IEA – science–policy interactions from a policy perspective , 1998 .

[48]  Markus Amann,et al.  Integrated assessment of emission control scenarios, including the impact of tropospheric ozone , 1995 .

[49]  Stephen C. Peck,et al.  Global warming uncertainties and the value of information: an analysis using CETA , 1993 .

[50]  H. Dowlatabadi.  Integrated assessment models of climate change: An incomplete overview , 1995 .

[51]  M. Janssen.  Meeting targets : tools to support integrated assessment modelling of global change , 1996 .

[52]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science , 1992 .

[53]  P. Bailey,et al.  IEA: A new methodology for environmental policy? , 1997 .

[54]  A. Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Can we integrate climatic modelling and assessment? , 1996 .

[55]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  MERGE. A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies , 1995 .

[56]  Gary W. Yohe,et al.  Near term mitigation policy for global change under uncertainty: Minimizing the expected cost of meeting unknown concentration thresholds , 1996 .

[57]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  A Regional Dynamic General-Equilibrium Model of Alternative Climate-Change Strategies , 1996 .

[58]  Charles D. Kolstad,et al.  Learning and Stock Effects in Environmental Regulation: The Case of Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 1996 .

[59]  Charles D. Kolstad.  George Bush versus Al Gore : irreversibilities in greenhouse gas accumulation and emission control investment , 1994 .

[60]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Uncertainty, complexity and post-normal science , 1994 .

[61]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis , 1995 .

[62]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[63]  Catherine Liston-Heyes,et al.  Sustainable resource use: the search for meaning , 1995 .

[64]  Norman J. Rosenberg,et al.  Towards an Integrated Impact Assessment of Climate Change: The MINK Study , 1993 .

[65]  Ferenc L. Toth,et al.  Integrated environmental assessment methods: Evolution and applications , 1998 .

[66]  J. H. G. Klabbers,et al.  Climate science and climate policy: Improving the science/policy interface , 1996 .

[67]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Integrated assessment: A growing child on its way to maturity , 1996 .

[68]  Samuel Fankhauser,et al.  The Global Warming Game - Simulations of a CO2 Reduction Agreement , 1996 .

[69]  Thomas E. Downing,et al.  Climate change implications for Europe: An application of the ESCAPE model☆ , 1994 .