Global chromatin compaction limits the strength of the DNA damage response

In response to DNA damage, chromatin undergoes a global decondensation process that has been proposed to facilitate genome surveillance. However, the impact that chromatin compaction has on the DNA damage response (DDR) has not directly been tested and thus remains speculative. We apply two independent approaches (one based on murine embryonic stem cells with reduced amounts of the linker histone H1 and the second making use of histone deacetylase inhibitors) to show that the strength of the DDR is amplified in the context of “open” chromatin. H1-depleted cells are hyperresistant to DNA damage and present hypersensitive checkpoints, phenotypes that we show are explained by an increase in the amount of signaling generated at each DNA break. Furthermore, the decrease in H1 leads to a general increase in telomere length, an as of yet unrecognized role for H1 in the regulation of chromosome structure. We propose that slight differences in the epigenetic configuration might account for the cell-to-cell variation in the strength of the DDR observed when groups of cells are challenged with DNA breaks.

[1]  Mark W. Dewhirst,et al.  Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response , 2006, Nature.

[2]  Y. Shiloh,et al.  Chromatin relaxation in response to DNA double-strand breaks is modulated by a novel ATM- and KAP-1 dependent pathway , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[3]  M. Fraga,et al.  DNA methyltransferases control telomere length and telomere recombination in mammalian cells , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[4]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Role of linker histone in chromatin structure and function: H1 stoichiometry and nucleosome repeat length , 2006, Chromosome Research.

[5]  M. Cuadrado,et al.  ATM regulates ATR chromatin loading in response to DNA double-strand breaks , 2006, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[6]  A. Stein,et al.  Histone H1 Depletion in Mammals Alters Global Chromatin Structure but Causes Specific Changes in Gene Regulation , 2005, Cell.

[7]  Huichen Wang,et al.  ATR Affecting Cell Radiosensitivity Is Dependent on Homologous Recombination Repair but Independent of Nonhomologous End Joining , 2004, Cancer Research.

[8]  Michel Nussenzweig,et al.  H2AX: the histone guardian of the genome. , 2004, DNA repair.

[9]  Kai Rothkamm,et al.  A Double-Strand Break Repair Defect in ATM-Deficient Cells Contributes to Radiosensitivity , 2004, Cancer Research.

[10]  Y. Tsujimoto,et al.  Involvement of Histone H1.2 in Apoptosis Induced by DNA Double-Strand Breaks , 2003, Cell.

[11]  T. Magnuson,et al.  H1 Linker Histones Are Essential for Mouse Development and Affect Nucleosome Spacing In Vivo , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[12]  S. Jackson,et al.  Suppression of homologous recombination by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae linker histone. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[13]  Gabriele Müller,et al.  Trichostatin A-induced histone acetylation causes decondensation of interphase chromatin , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[14]  J. Milner,et al.  p53 is a chromatin accessibility factor for nucleotide excision repair of DNA damage , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[15]  M. Kastan,et al.  DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation , 2003, Nature.

[16]  Hui Zhao,et al.  Disruption of the checkpoint kinase 1/cell division cycle 25A pathway abrogates ionizing radiation-induced S and G2 checkpoints , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Michel C. Nussenzweig,et al.  Genomic Instability in Mice Lacking Histone H2AX , 2002, Science.

[18]  S M Bailey,et al.  Strand-Specific Postreplicative Processing of Mammalian Telomeres , 2001, Science.

[19]  M. Blasco,et al.  Mammalian Ku86 protein prevents telomeric fusions independently of the length of TTAGGG repeats and the G‐strand overhang , 2000, EMBO reports.

[20]  C. Allis,et al.  Phosphorylation of linker histone H1 regulates gene expression in vivo by mimicking H1 removal. , 1999, Molecular cell.

[21]  T. Myers,et al.  Gadd45, a p53-Responsive Stress Protein, Modifies DNA Accessibility on Damaged Chromatin , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[22]  M. Gatei,et al.  Chk1 complements the G2/M checkpoint defect and radiosensitivity of ataxia-telangiectasia cells , 1999, Oncogene.

[23]  A. Carr,et al.  Protein kinase mutants of human ATR increase sensitivity to UV and ionizing radiation and abrogate cell cycle checkpoint control. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  E. Rogakou,et al.  DNA Double-stranded Breaks Induce Histone H2AX Phosphorylation on Serine 139* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  H. Tanke,et al.  Telomeres in the mouse have large inter-chromosomal variations in the number of T2AG3 repeats. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  C. Allis,et al.  Chromatin condensation: does histone H1 dephosphorylation play a role? , 1992, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[27]  Kazuhide Takahashi,et al.  Changes in Nuclease Sensitivity of Mammalian Cells after Irradiation with 60Co γ-rays , 1985 .

[28]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[29]  Z. Herceg,et al.  Histone acetylation by Trrap–Tip60 modulates loading of repair proteins and repair of DNA double-strand breaks , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[30]  T. Misteli,et al.  Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. , 2006, Developmental cell.

[31]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Overexpression of a kinase‐inactive ATR protein causes sensitivity to DNA‐damaging agents and defects in cell cycle checkpoints , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[32]  I. Kaneko,et al.  Changes in nuclease sensitivity of mammalian cells after irradiation with 60Co gamma-rays. , 1985, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.