In-vehicle driver distractions: characteristics underlying drivers’ risk perceptions

Driver distraction continues to receive considerable research interest but the drivers‟ perspective is less well documented. The current research focussed on identifying features that are salient to drivers in their risk perception judgements for 19 in-vehicle distractions. Both technological (e.g. mobile phones) and non technological (e.g. eating) distractions were considered. Analysis identified that males and females were rating 7 of the 19 distractions differently. The current paper presents the data for the female participants (n = 84). Multidimensional scaling analysis identified three main dimensions contributing to female drivers‟ risk perception judgements. Qualitative characteristics such as the level of exposure to a distraction were identified as significant contributors to drivers‟ risk perception as well as features inherent in the distractions such as distractions being related to communication. This exploratory work contributes to better understanding female drivers‟ perceptions of risk associated with in-vehicle distractions. Understanding the drivers‟ perspective can help guide the development of road safety messages and ultimately improve the impact of such messages.

[1]  William J. Horrey,et al.  Driver-initiated distractions: examining strategic adaptation for in-vehicle task initiation. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Duncan P. Brumby,et al.  iPod distraction: effects of portable music-player use on driver performance , 2007, CHI.

[3]  Matthew Witte,et al.  Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Suzanne P McEvoy,et al.  The contribution of passengers versus mobile phone use to motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance by the driver. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Patrick J. F. Groenen,et al.  MDS Models and Measures of Fit , 1997 .

[6]  S. Schiffman Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling , 1981 .

[7]  Timothy Chamberlain,et al.  The effect of audio materials from a rear-seat audiovisual entertainment system or from radio on simulated driving , 2008 .

[8]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .

[9]  Gary E. Burnett,et al.  On-the-move destination entry for vehicle navigation systems: Unsafe by any means? , 2004, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[10]  Christopher B. Mayhorn,et al.  Perceptions of Driver Distraction by Cellular Phone Users and Nonusers , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[11]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  The influence of driver distraction on the severity of injuries sustained by teenage drivers and their passengers. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Michael J. Goodman,et al.  DRIVER DISTRACTION WITH WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ROUTE GUIDANCE SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[13]  M R Stevenson,et al.  The impact of driver distraction on road safety: results from a representative survey in two Australian states , 2006, Injury Prevention.

[14]  Michael A. Regan,et al.  The effects of text messaging on young novice driver performance , 2005 .

[15]  Bor-Shong Liu,et al.  In-vehicle workload assessment: effects of traffic situations and cellular telephone use. , 2006, Journal of safety research.

[16]  Jeff K Caird,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Lana M Trick,et al.  Testing assumptions implicit in the use of the 15-second rule as an early predictor of whether an in-vehicle device produces unacceptable levels of distraction. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Peter J Cooper,et al.  Turning gap acceptance decision-making: the impact of driver distraction. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[19]  H. Kastenholz,et al.  Laypeople's and Experts' Perception of Nanotechnology Hazards , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  Jayesh Patel,et al.  Factors influencing subjective ranking of driver distractions. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[22]  M. Just,et al.  A decrease in brain activation associated with driving when listening to someone speak , 2008, Brain Research.

[23]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone , 2001, Psychological science.

[24]  Mathew P White,et al.  Risk Perceptions of Mobile Phone Use While Driving , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  D. Strayer,et al.  Passenger and Cell-Phone Conversations in Simulated Driving , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[26]  W. C. Maples,et al.  The effects of cell phone use on peripheral vision. , 2008, Optometry.

[27]  Christine M. Wickens,et al.  Cognitive failures as predictors of driving errors, lapses, and violations. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  J Lockhart,et al.  The effects of practice with MP3 players on driving performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Y Ian Noy,et al.  Task interruptability and duration as measures of visual distraction. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[30]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[31]  Kenneth W. Gish,et al.  DISTRACTIONS IN EVERYDAY DRIVING , 2003 .

[32]  Nick Reed,et al.  The effect of text messaging on driver behaviour: a simulator study , 2008 .