Mapping Experience: Crowdsourced Cartography

This paper considers the emerging phenomena of crowdsourced cartography in relation to ideas about the organisation of contemporary knowledge production in capitalist societies. Taking a philosophical perspective that views mapping as a processual, creative, productive act, constructed through citational, embodied and contextual experiences, we examine how we might profitably analyse collaborative crowdsourced projects like OpenStreetMap to better understand geographicknowledge production in a shifting political economy and socio-technical landscape. We begin by characterising crowdsourcing practices in the wider context of Web 2.0, which some commentators assert is rapidly becoming a new, dominant mode of knowledge production. We then contextualise Web 2.0 knowledge production, drawing upon the ideas of sociologist George Ritzer, and his notion of ‘prosumption’, geographer Michael Goodchild’s idea of volunteerist ‘citizen scientists’, andeconomic commentator Nicholas Carr’s critique of the ‘ignorance of crowds’. We then go on to discuss the changing nature of cartography in the Web 2.0 era with respect to authorship, ontology, representation and temporality.

[1]  R. Kitchin,et al.  Mapping modes, methods and moments: a manifesto for map studies , 2009 .

[2]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[3]  W. Bunge,et al.  Fitzgerald: Geography of a Revolution , 1971 .

[4]  Mark Graham,et al.  NEOGEOGRAPHY AND THE PALIMPSESTS OF PLACE: WEB 2.0 AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A VIRTUAL EARTH , 2010 .

[5]  Amy D. Propen Critical GPS: Toward a New Politics of Location , 2005 .

[6]  S. Gorman,et al.  Volunteered Geographic Information and Crowdsourcing Disaster Relief: A Case Study of the Haitian Earthquake , 2010 .

[7]  Nicholas G. Carr,et al.  Recent Future-Related Writing , 2010 .

[8]  G. Ritzer,et al.  Production, Consumption, Prosumption , 2010 .

[9]  M. Curry Digital Places: Living with Geographic Information Technologies , 1998 .

[10]  D. Gregory Seeing Red: Baghdad and the event-ful city , 2010 .

[11]  J. Pickles Ground truth : the social implications of geographic information systems , 1995 .

[12]  You Are Here: Information Drift , 1994 .

[13]  A. Barnes Geo/graphic mapping , 2007 .

[14]  J. Crampton Cartography: maps 2.0 , 2009 .

[15]  Matthew Zook,et al.  Placemarks and waterlines: Racialized cyberscapes in post-Katrina Google Earth , 2009 .

[16]  Ray Bert,et al.  \IThe Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains\N By Nicholas Carr. New York City: W.W. Norton, 2010. , 2010 .

[17]  Alexander J. Kent,et al.  Stylistic Diversity in European State 1 : 50 000 Topographic Maps , 2007 .

[18]  J. B. Harley,et al.  DECONSTRUCTING THE MAP , 1989 .

[19]  S. Elwood Volunteered geographic information: future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS , 2008 .

[20]  Ogt O'Brien,et al.  O'Brien on Ramm, Topf, Chilton: OpenStreetMap: Using and Enhancing the Free Map of the World , 2011 .

[21]  Chris Perkins,et al.  The potential of user-generated cartography: a case study of the OpenStreetMap project and Mapchester mapping party , 2008 .

[22]  Lei Yan,et al.  Citizen-generated spatial data and information: Risks and opportunities , 2011, Proceedings of 2011 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics.

[23]  M. Haklay How Good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A Comparative Study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets , 2010 .

[24]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life , 2011 .

[25]  David Rhind,et al.  Framework for the world , 1997 .