What makes implementation intentions (in)effective for physical activity among older adults?

OBJECTIVES For most populations, implementation intentions (IIs) facilitate physical activity (PA). However, for older adults, previous studies found mixed evidence for the effectiveness of this behaviour change technique. To examine which characteristics of IIs predict successful enactment, the content of older participants' IIs formed within a self-regulatory intervention to prompt PA was analysed. DESIGN A sample of N = 126 German speaking adults aged 64 and older formed up to six IIs for PA and reported their enactment 5 weeks later. METHODS Controlling for age and sex, multilevel models tested associations between characteristics of IIs (e.g., chronological rank of II, hetero- and homogeneity, specificity, presence of certain cues) and enactment. RESULTS Significantly related to enactment were: the chronological rank of an II (first IIs superior to last IIs), greater heterogeneity in activities, greater specificity of when-cues, and greater use of pre-existing routines. CONCLUSIONS Participants were more likely to enact their IIs 5 weeks later if they planned different (heterogeneous) activities, created IIs with more specific when-cues (e.g., on Monday at 9 am), and in particular a routine (e.g., after breakfast). They also enacted the first three IIs (chronological rank of II) more often than the last three IIs. Future experimental studies should test whether providing instructions to create IIs based on the above significant characteristics lead to more effective health behaviour change among older adults.

[1]  P. Lally,et al.  Habit formation following routine-based versus time-based cue planning: A randomized controlled trial. , 2021, British journal of health psychology.

[2]  D. French,et al.  How Does the Understanding, Experience, and Enactment of Self-Regulation Behaviour Change Techniques Vary with Age? A Thematic Analysis. , 2020, Applied psychology. Health and well-being.

[3]  R. Schwarzer,et al.  What makes a good action plan? Characteristics and enactment of fruit and vegetable plans , 2019, Appetite.

[4]  L. Warner,et al.  Perceived somatic and affective barriers for self-efficacy and physical activity , 2019, Journal of health psychology.

[5]  C. May,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of maintenance of physical activity behaviour change in cancer survivors , 2019, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[6]  F. Mialhe,et al.  Impact of implementation intentions on physical activity practice in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials , 2018, PloS one.

[7]  Odile Sauzet,et al.  Behavior change techniques for increasing physical activity in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2018, Cancer management and research.

[8]  Francis L. Huang.  Multilevel Modeling Myths , 2018, School psychology quarterly : the official journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[9]  Marie Johnston,et al.  Interventions to Promote Healthy Eating, Physical Activity and Smoking in Low-Income Groups: a Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Behavior Change Techniques and Delivery/Context , 2018, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[10]  C. Vandelanotte,et al.  Age differences in physical activity intentions and implementation intention preferences , 2018, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[11]  Neil Howlett,et al.  Are physical activity interventions for healthy inactive adults effective in promoting behavior change and maintenance, and which behavior change techniques are effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, Translational behavioral medicine.

[12]  C. Armitage,et al.  Does Situation-Specificity Affect the Operation of Implementation Intentions? , 2017, Behavior therapy.

[13]  N. Knoll,et al.  Which characteristics of planning matter? Individual and dyadic physical activity plans and their effects on plan enactment. , 2017, Social science & medicine.

[14]  Jan Keller,et al.  What contributes to action plan enactment? Examining characteristics of physical activity plans. , 2017, British journal of health psychology.

[15]  Corneel Vandelanotte,et al.  Cue Consistency Associated with Physical Activity Automaticity and Behavior , 2016, Behavioral medicine.

[16]  R. Schwarzer,et al.  Revisiting self-regulatory techniques to promote physical activity in older adults: null-findings from a randomised controlled trial , 2016, Psychology & health.

[17]  Adrian Bauman,et al.  Updating the Evidence for Physical Activity: Summative Reviews of the Epidemiological Evidence, Prevalence, and Interventions to Promote "Active Aging". , 2016, The Gerontologist.

[18]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Implementation intention and planning interventions in Health Psychology: Recommendations from the Synergy Expert Group for research and practice , 2016, Psychology & health.

[19]  M. Sieverding,et al.  Intervention-Elicited Reactance and Its Implications , 2015 .

[20]  Anna M. Engel and Julius Kuhl.  Personality and Planning: The Interplay Between Linear and Holistic Processing , 2015 .

[21]  M. Kliegel,et al.  Improving everyday prospective memory performance in older adults: comparing cognitive process and strategy training. , 2014, Psychology and aging.

[22]  P. Gollwitzer.  Weakness of the will: Is a quick fix possible? , 2014 .

[23]  David P French,et al.  Which Behaviour Change Techniques Are Most Effective at Increasing Older Adults’ Self-Efficacy and Physical Activity Behaviour? A Systematic Review , 2014, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[24]  L. Warner,et al.  What do targeting positive views on ageing add to a physical activity intervention in older adults? Results from a randomised controlled trial , 2014, Psychology & health.

[25]  Gert B. M. Mensink,et al.  [Physical activity: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1)]. , 2013, Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz.

[26]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[27]  C. Abraham,et al.  The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions , 2013, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[28]  D. French,et al.  What are the most effective techniques in changing obese individuals’ physical activity self-efficacy and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2013, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[29]  Gaston Godin,et al.  A meta-analytic review of the effect of implementation intentions on physical activity , 2013 .

[30]  Petra Platen,et al.  Barriers to physical activity in older adults in Germany: a cross-sectional study , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[31]  Johannes Brug,et al.  More or better: Do the number and specificity of implementation intentions matter in increasing physical activity? , 2011 .

[32]  D. French,et al.  What are the most effective intervention techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour--and are they the same? , 2011, Health education research.

[33]  S. Michie,et al.  Using the Internet to Promote Health Behavior Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Theoretical Basis, Use of Behavior Change Techniques, and Mode of Delivery on Efficacy , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[34]  C. Abraham,et al.  Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[35]  F. Sniehotta,et al.  Towards a theory of intentional behaviour change: plans, planning, and self-regulation. , 2009, British journal of health psychology.

[36]  Stephen Sutton,et al.  What Do People Think about When They Answer Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaires? , 2007, Journal of health psychology.

[37]  R. Schwarzer,et al.  Adoption and maintenance of physical activity: Planning interventions in young, middle-aged, and older adults , 2006, Psychology & health.

[38]  P. Baltes,et al.  Managing life through personal goals: intergoal facilitation and intensity of goal pursuit in younger and older adulthood. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[39]  J. Henry,et al.  A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[40]  S. Biddle,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Review of the Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior in Physical Activity: Predictive Validity and the Contribution of Additional Variables , 2002 .

[41]  P. Sheeran.  Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review , 2002 .

[42]  P. Gollwitzer.  Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[43]  Laura L. Carstensen,et al.  Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: support for socioemotional selectivity theory. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[44]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[45]  H. McKay,et al.  Health behaviour change theory meets falls prevention: Feasibility of a habit-based balance and strength exercise intervention for older adults , 2016 .

[46]  J. Hilbe.  Negative Binomial Regression: Index , 2011 .

[47]  J. Hilbe.  Negative Binomial Regression: Preface , 2007 .

[48]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes , 2006 .

[49]  P. Gollwitzer.  Goal Achievement: The Role of Intentions , 1993 .