Collaborative concept mapping: an education research team leveraging their collaborative efforts

Collaborative concept mapping (CCM) has been a tool deployed by educators to enhance learning in such situations as primary science classes, supported learning environments and asynchronous computer-mediated learning. Of its outcomes, CCM has produced rich group discussion about ideas and possibilities pertinent to the topic or problem at hand. The majority of research into CCM has been explicitly pointed at enhancing learning. This chapter takes a different tack by reporting on how the authors used CCM to seek understandings of its utility in enabling collaborative research by creating synergies within a research team located in the Faculty of Education at the University of Southern Queensland. The following questions were used to focus the research: • What was the research team’s experience of collaborative concept mapping? • What propositions did the team construct about teamwork and collaboration? • How did the interactions among team members facilitate meaning-making about teamwork and collaboration? The data consisted of this team’s collaborative concept map and recordings of the dialogue during the process of constructing the map. Analysis revealed the team’s emerging propositions about teamwork and collaboration and also contributed understandings of the co-constructed patterns of talk that produced this dynamic map. The chapter concludes that collaborative concept mapping is a useful tool for research and other team development, and possibly for the collaborative conceptualisation of future team research projects.

[1]  Suphi Önder Bütüner,et al.  Astrid Brinkmann, Graphical Knowledge Display- Mind Mapping and Concept Mapping as Efficient Tools in Mathematics Education , 2007 .

[2]  Josianne Basque,et al.  Collaborative Concept Mapping in Education: Major Research Trends , 2006 .

[3]  Hong Gao,et al.  A Review of Studies on Collaborative Concept Mapping: What Have We Learned About the Technique and What Is Next? , 2007 .

[4]  L. S. Vygotksy Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[5]  Sarah Kuhn,et al.  Thinking with things, teaching with things ‐ Enhancing student learning in qualitative research through reflective use of tools and materials , 2007 .

[6]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Learning processes and collaborative concept mapping , 1997 .

[7]  G. Erkens,et al.  Collaborative Concept Mapping: Provoking and Supporting Meaningful Discourse , 2002 .

[8]  Raymond W. Francis Demonstrating scholarship and effectiveness of teaching through the application of data collected from concept maps , 2007, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice.

[9]  T. Buzan Use both sides of your brain , 1976 .

[10]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[11]  Ryan Singh Paul,et al.  A Review of “Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporation” , 2012, Inf. Soc..

[12]  Ember Chittenden Building Conceptual Bridges , 2007 .

[13]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[14]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays , 1981 .

[15]  D. Silverman Doing Qualitative Research , 2009 .

[16]  Margaret Turner,et al.  Contemporary approach to writing non-linear online learning resources , 2007 .

[17]  Jodi Levine Laufgraben,et al.  Sustaining and Improving Learning Communities , 2004 .

[18]  N. Denzin,et al.  Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. , 2005 .

[19]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[20]  M. Lawson,et al.  Classroom-based interventions to improve students' learning capital , 2008 .