Coping With Unintended Behavior of Users and Products: Ontological Modelling of Product Functionality and Use

The function-behavior representation language FBRL was originally devised for modeling and knowledge management of intended product behavior. This paper explores its potential for application to other-than-intended behavior in a product-use context by introducing consideration of the user and the environment. We found that slightly adapted building blocks from as-is FBRL can be applied to behavior that is unintended and/or not performed by the product. To support anticipation of unintended behavior in design, special attention has to be paid to the knowledge that connects product functions, user actions and environment behavior. We distinguish typical and atypical forms of unintended use. Some forms of typical unintended use can be directly derived from the intended use. Yet, most forms of unintended use require additional knowledge, e.g., from user observations. To include such knowledge, subsequent effort has to be put into its systematization. In this paper, an ontological scheme is presented for models of the product, the user and the environment and related use processes. We present an example and discuss how supporting tools can help designers to deal with unintended use. In the example case, a modeling schema for unintended behaviors of products is extended towards unintended behaviors of users.Copyright © 2004 by ASME

[1]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Customer Integrated Systematic Design , 1999, Trans. SDPS.

[2]  Fumihiko Kimura,et al.  Representation of Functional Relations Among Parts And Its Application to Product Failure Reasoning , 2000 .

[3]  Kosuke Ishii,et al.  ADVANCED FMEA USING META BEHAVIOR MODELING FOR CONCURRENT DESIGN OF PRODUCTS AND CONTROLS , 1998 .

[4]  Riichiro Mizoguchi,et al.  Ontology-based description of functional design knowledge and its use in a functional way server , 2003, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  B. H. Lee Using Bayes belief networks in industrial FMEA modeling and analysis , 2001, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2001 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity (Cat. No.01CH37179).

[6]  Riichiro Mizoguchi,et al.  TOWARDS MODELING DESIGN RATIONAL OF SUPPLEMENTARY FUNCTIONS IN CONCEPTUAL DESIGN , 2004 .

[7]  Imre Horváth,et al.  Ontology-based modeling of product functionality and use part 2: considering use and unintended behavior , 2002 .

[8]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A Translation Approach to Portable Ontologies , 1993 .

[9]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[10]  Imre Horváth,et al.  Use-driven product conceptualization based on nucleus modelling and simulation with scenarios , 2003 .

[11]  James F. Allen Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals , 1983, CACM.

[12]  Jenny Janhager UTILIZATION OF SCENARIO BUILDING IN THE TECHNICAL PROCESS , 2003 .

[13]  Riichiro Mizoguchi,et al.  Ontology-based systematization of functional knowledge , 2004 .

[14]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[15]  F Wilhelm CONSIDERATION AND MODELING OF USE PROCESSES IN COMPUTER-AIDED CONCEPTUAL DESIGN: A STATE OF THE ART REVIEW , 2002 .

[16]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Functional Representation of Designs and Redesign Problem Solving , 1989, IJCAI.

[17]  Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al.  A new approach for evaluation of risk priorities of failure modes in FMEA , 2001 .

[18]  Mitsuru Ikeda,et al.  A representation language for behavior and function: FBRL , 1996 .