Intermanual interactions during simultaneous execution and programming of finger movements.

In bimanual movements, some differences between the movements performed by the two hands cause interference, while others do not. Similarly, in choice between responses with the left and right hand some differences between the two movements increase RT, while others do not. It is suggested that both kinds of effects are, at least in part, due to the incompatibility between processes that determine characteristics of movements jointly for both hands and that are present during preparation as well as during execution. This hypothesis implies that during execution of one movement, programming of a different movement to be performed with the other hand should be impaired, as compared to a condition in which the successive movements of both hands are the same. this expectation was confirmed for finger movements of different forms where an effect on choice RT had been shown previously. On the other hand, interference between execution and programming is not to be expected when successive movements differ in characteristics that are likely to be specified separately for each hand, as indicated by a lacking effect in choice experiments. This expectation was confirmed for successive movements performed with different fingers of either hand as compared to movements performed with the same fingers.

[1]  H N Zelaznik,et al.  The specification of digit and duration during motor programming: a new method of precueing. , 1982, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  H. Heuer.  Choice between finger movements of different and identical form: The effect of relative signal frequency , 1982 .

[3]  B. Kerr,et al.  Task Factors That Influence Selection and Preparation for Voluntary Movements , 1978 .

[4]  J. Ells.  Analysis of temporal and attentional aspects of movement control. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  P. McLeod.  36 What Can Probe Rt Tell Us About the Attentional Demands of Movement , 1980 .

[6]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  Binary choice reaction time as a criterion of motor equivalence , 1982 .

[7]  Carol A. Putnam,et al.  On the Space-Time Structure of Human Interlimb Co-Ordination , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  A priming method for investigating the selection of motor responses , 1982 .

[9]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[10]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Doing two things at once: The role of temporal compatibility , 1979 .

[11]  H. Heuer.  Binary choice reaction time as a criterion of motor equivalence: Further evidence , 1982 .

[12]  D. Wakelin.  The role of the response in psychological refractoriness. , 1976, Acta psychologica.

[13]  D Goodman,et al.  On the coordination of two-handed movements. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[15]  Binary choice reaction time as a function of the relationship between durations and forms of responses. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.