Attentional selection of overlapped shapes: a study using brief shape aftereffects

Prior studies using brief stimulus sequences revealed "opponent shape aftereffects", indicative of direct opponent coding of global shape attributes such as aspect ratio, skew, taper, curvature, and convexity (perhaps in IT). Further, aftereffects from overlapped opponent pairs of adaptor shapes (e.g., concave and convex shapes) were substantially modulated by attention [Vision Res. 41 (2001) 3883]. Hypothetically, (1) attention might weight the attended and ignored contours at early stages of processing, or (2) it might sway opposing neural activity (e.g., of convex- vs. concave-tuned units) at the stage of opponent shape coding. Attentional modulation was equivalent for opponent pairs (producing opposite aftereffects) and non-opponent pairs (producing orthogonal aftereffects) of overlapped adaptor shapes, whether convexity or aspect-ratio aftereffects were measured. Further, the degree of attentional modulation obtained for these aftereffects (approximately 60%) was comparable to that obtained for V4 cells [J. Neurosci. 19 (1999) 1736]. Taken together, differential contour weighting appears to be the primary mechanism of attentional modulation of brief shape aftereffects.

[1]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies , 1937 .

[2]  Kazuo Hikosaka,et al.  Tolerances of responses to visual patterns in neurons of the posterior inferotemporal cortex in the macaque against changing stimulus size and orientation, and deleting patterns , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[3]  Peter Wenderoth,et al.  The effects of exposure duration and surrounding frames on direct and indirect tilt aftereffects and illusions , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Christof Koch,et al.  Attentional capacity is undifferentiated: Concurrent discrimination of form, color, and motion , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. , 1988, Science.

[6]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Attention during adaptation weakens negative afterimages. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  M. Wertheimer,et al.  A source book of Gestalt psychology. , 1939 .

[8]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  C. Chubb,et al.  The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect , 2001, Vision Research.

[10]  Janette Atkinson,et al.  Channels in Vision: Basic Aspects , 1978 .

[11]  E. Iwai,et al.  Responsiveness of inferotemporal single units to visual pattern stimuli in monkeys performing discrimination , 1980, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  D. Pollen,et al.  Spatial and temporal frequency selectivity of neurones in visual cortical areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  Carrie J. McAdams,et al.  Effects of Attention on Orientation-Tuning Functions of Single Neurons in Macaque Cortical Area V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[16]  M W von Grünau,et al.  Attentional selection of motion states. , 1998, Spatial vision.

[17]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Selective visual attention modulates the direct tilt aftereffect , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  RussLL L. Ds Vnlos,et al.  SPATIAL FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY OF CELLS IN MACAQUE VISUAL CORTEX , 2022 .

[20]  G Sperling,et al.  The attention operating characteristic: examples from visual search. , 1978, Science.

[21]  C. Gross,et al.  Visuotopic organization and extent of V3 and V4 of the macaque , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  M. Wertheimer.  A source book of Gestalt psychology. , 1939 .

[23]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Optical Imaging of Functional Organization in the Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex , 1996, Science.

[24]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  D. Regan,et al.  Shape discrimination and the judgement of perfect symmetry: Dissociation of shape from size , 1992, Vision Research.

[26]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The perceived spatial frequency shift: evidence for frequency‐selective neurones in the human brain , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  F S Frome,et al.  Shifts in perception of size after adaptation to gratings. , 1979, Science.

[28]  M. Sanders.  Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[29]  S. Suzuki,et al.  Attention-dependent brief adaptation to contour orientation: a high-level aftereffect for convexity? , 2001, Vision Research.

[30]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Focused attention distorts visual space: an attentional repulsion effect. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Minami Ito,et al.  Columns for visual features of objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex , 1992, Nature.

[32]  Otto H. MacLin,et al.  Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  H. Wallach,et al.  Figural aftereffects; an investigation of visual processes. , 1944 .

[34]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  A shape-contrast effect for briefly presented stimuli. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  R. Desimone,et al.  Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Further studies of gamma movement. , 1938 .

[37]  R. Desimone,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in area V4 of the macaque: sensitivity to stimulus form. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  M. Ito,et al.  Processing of contrast polarity of visual images in inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Attentional modulation of adaptation to two-component transparent motion , 1995, Vision Research.

[40]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[41]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  I. Fujita,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms of selectivity for object features revealed by blocking inhibition in inferotemporal cortex , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  Minami Ito,et al.  Size and position invariance of neuronal responses in monkey inferotemporal cortex. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  Y. Yamane,et al.  Complex objects are represented in macaque inferotemporal cortex by the combination of feature columns , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  R Vogels,et al.  Responses of monkey inferior temporal neurons to luminance-, motion-, and texture-defined gratings. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  M. Tarr,et al.  Visual Object Recognition , 1996, ISTCS.

[47]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[48]  A. Treisman,et al.  Voluntary Attention Modulates fMRI Activity in Human MT–MST , 1997, Neuron.