Biomechanical examination of the ‘plateau phenomenon’ in ActiGraph vertical activity counts

This paper determines if the leveling off ('plateau/inverted-U' phenomenon) of vertical ActiGraph activity counts during running at higher speeds is attributable to the monitor's signal filtering and acceleration detection characteristics. Ten endurance-trained male participants (mean (SD) age = 28.2 (4.7) years) walked at 3, 5 and 7 km h(-1), and ran at 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20 km h(-1) on a force treadmill while wearing an ActiGraph GT3X monitor at the waist. Triaxial accelerations of the body's center of mass (CoM) and frequency content of these accelerations were computed from the force treadmill data. GT3X vertical activity counts demonstrated the expected 'plateau/inverted-U' phenomenon. In contrast, vertical CoM accelerations increased with increasing speed (1.32 ± 0.26 g at 10 km h(-1) and 1.68 ± 0.24 g at 20 km h(-1)). The dominant frequency in the CoM acceleration signals increased with running speed (14.8 ± 3.2 Hz at 10 km h(-1) and 24.8 ± 3.2 Hz at 20 km h(-1)) and lay beyond the ActiGraph band-pass filter (0.25 to 2.5 Hz) limits. In conclusion, CoM acceleration magnitudes during walking and running lie within the ActiGraph monitor's dynamic acceleration detecting capability. Acceleration signals of higher frequencies that are eliminated by the ActiGraph band-pass filter may be necessary to distinguish among exercise intensity at higher running speeds.

[1]  L. Mâsse,et al.  Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  Joseph Hamill,et al.  Normalization of ground reaction forces. , 2006, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[3]  J. Halbertsma,et al.  Changes in leg movements and muscle activity with speed of locomotion and mode of progression in humans. , 1985, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[4]  D. Bassett,et al.  Comparison of four ActiGraph accelerometers during walking and running. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  A. Thorstensson,et al.  Ground reaction forces at different speeds of human walking and running. , 1989, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[6]  Kong Y Chen,et al.  Comparing the performance of three generations of ActiGraph accelerometers. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[7]  Blandine Bril,et al.  Development of postural control of gravity forces in children during the first 5 years of walking , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  J. Staudenmayer,et al.  Comparison of the ActiGraph 7164 and the ActiGraph GT1M during self-paced locomotion. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  P. Papanek,et al.  Association Between the Female Athlete Triad and Endothelial Dysfunction in Dancers , 2011, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[10]  J. D. Janssen,et al.  A triaxial accelerometer and portable data processing unit for the assessment of daily physical activity , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  S. Hasan,et al.  Relationship between vertical ground reaction force and speed during walking, slow jogging, and running. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  John Staudenmayer,et al.  An artificial neural network to estimate physical activity energy expenditure and identify physical activity type from an accelerometer. , 2009, Journal of applied physiology.

[13]  Thomas R. Shrout,et al.  Piezoelectric properties of zirconium-doped barium titanate single crystals grown by templated grain growth , 1999 .

[14]  G. Cavagna,et al.  The sources of external work in level walking and running. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  John Staudenmayer,et al.  Evaluation of artificial neural network algorithms for predicting METs and activity type from accelerometer data: validation on an independent sample. , 2011, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  R. Eston,et al.  Influence of speed and step frequency during walking and running on motion sensor output. , 2007, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  R M Alexander,et al.  Fourier analysis of forces exerted in walking and running. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  T. Derrick,et al.  Evaluation of time-series data sets using the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. , 1994, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  D. Nieman Physical Activity During Youth Sports Practices , 2012 .

[20]  R. Kram,et al.  Metabolic cost of generating horizontal forces during human running. , 1999, Journal of applied physiology.

[21]  D. I. Miller,et al.  Ground reaction forces in running: a reexamination. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Robert Williams,et al.  Fully proportional actigraphy: A new instrument , 1996 .

[23]  E K Antonsson,et al.  The frequency content of gait. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Barry W. Fudge,et al.  Estimation of oxygen uptake during fast running using accelerometry and heart rate. , 2007, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  Karsten Froberg,et al.  Reexamination of validity and reliability of the CSA monitor in walking and running. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.