The Value of Online Information Privacy: Evidence from the USA and Singapore

Concern over online information privacy is widespread and rising. However, prior research is silent about the value of information privacy in the presence of potential benefits from sharing personally identifiable information. We analyzed individuals’ trade-offs between the benefits and costs of providing personal information to websites. We found that benefits – monetary reward and future convenience – significantly affect individuals’ preferences over websites with differing privacy policies. We also quantified the value of website privacy protection. Among U.S. subjects, protection against errors, improper access, and secondary use of personal information is worth US$30.49 – 44.62. Finally, we identified three distinct segments of Internet consumers – privacy guardians, information sellers, and convenience seekers.

[1]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk , 1948, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  S. Addelman Orthogonal Main-Effect Plans for Asymmetrical Factorial Experiments , 1962 .

[3]  John Leubsdorf,et al.  Privacy and Freedom , 1968 .

[4]  David J. Danelski,et al.  Privacy and Freedom , 1968 .

[5]  I. Altman,et al.  Interpersonal exchange as a function of rewards and costs and situational factors: Expectancy confirmation-disconfirmation. , 1969 .

[6]  I. Altman,et al.  Self-disclosure as a function of reward-cost outcomes. , 1975, Sociometry.

[7]  김정년,et al.  Managerial Economics 『관리경제학』 , 1976 .

[8]  R. Laufer,et al.  Privacy as a Concept and a Social Issue: A Multidimensional Developmental Theory , 1977 .

[9]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[10]  G. Stigler An Introduction to Privacy in Economics and Politics , 1980, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[11]  Paul D. Tolchinsky,et al.  Employee perceptions of invasion of privacy: A field simulation experiment. , 1981 .

[12]  Paul D. Tolchinsky,et al.  A Survey of Employee Perceptions of Information Privacy in Organizations , 1982 .

[13]  Hal G. Gueutal,et al.  A Field Experiment Comparing Information-Privacy Values, Beliefs, and Attitudes Across Several Types of Organizations , 1983 .

[14]  K. Moorthy Market Segmentation, Self-Selection, and Product Line Design , 1984 .

[15]  Philippe Cattin,et al.  Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update , 1989 .

[16]  James E. Katz,et al.  PUBLIC OPINION TRENDS: PRIVACY AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY , 1990 .

[17]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .

[18]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Segmenting Markets with Conjoint Analysis , 1991 .

[19]  C. Goodwin Privacy: Recognition of a Consumer Right , 1991 .

[20]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  "How Did They Get My Name?": An Exploratory Investigation of Consumer Attitudes Toward Secondary Information Use , 1993, MIS Q..

[21]  M. E. Gordon,et al.  Direct Mail Privacy-Efficiency Trade-offs within an Implied Social Contract Framework , 1993 .

[22]  H. Jeff Smith,et al.  Values, personal information privacy, and regulatory approaches , 1995, CACM.

[23]  H. Jeff Smith,et al.  Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals' Concerns About Organizational Practices , 1996, MIS Q..

[24]  Kenneth C. Laudon,et al.  Markets and privacy , 1993, CACM.

[25]  M. Wedel,et al.  Metric Conjoint Segmentation Methods: A Monte Carlo Comparison , 1996 .

[26]  Erik R. Eddy,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT POLICIES ON REACTIONS TO HUMAN RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS: AN INTEGRATION OF PRIVACY AND PROCEDURAL JUSTICE PERSPECTIVES , 1999 .

[27]  Stuart L. Esrock,et al.  A Dichotomy of Privacy: Personal and Professional Attitudes of Marketers , 1999 .

[28]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Building consumer trust online , 1999, CACM.

[29]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Beyond Concern: Understanding Net Users' Attitudes About Online Privacy , 1999, ArXiv.

[30]  Paola Benassi,et al.  TRUSTe: an online privacy seal program , 1999, CACM.

[31]  M. Culnan,et al.  Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation , 1999 .

[32]  J. Phelps,et al.  Privacy Concerns and Consumer Willingness to Provide Personal Information , 2000 .

[33]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  Information Privacy: Corporate Management and National Regulation , 2000 .

[34]  Jim Harper,et al.  With A Grain of Salt: What Consumer Privacy Surveys Don't Tell Us , 2002 .

[35]  Jasmine Schwartz Giving the Web a Memory Cost Its Users Privacy , 2001 .

[36]  D. Wittink Market Measurement and Analysis: The First Marketing Science Conference* , 2001 .

[37]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  Information Privacy and Marketing: What the U.S. Should (and Shouldn't) Learn from Europe , 2001 .

[38]  Pm Schwartz,et al.  Beyond Lessig's Code for Internet Privacy: Cyberspace Filters, Privacy Control and Fair Information Practices , 2001 .

[39]  R. b Hahn,et al.  An Assessment of the Costs of Proposed Online Privacy Legislation , 2001 .

[40]  Michael A. Turner The Impact of Data Restrictions On Consumer Distance Shopping , 2001 .

[41]  Lisa Farrell,et al.  Can Expected Utility Theory Explain Gambling , 2002 .

[42]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Concern for Information Privacy Instrument , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  Lee Rainie,et al.  Getting Serious Online. , 2002 .

[44]  Michael R. Ward The economics of online retail markets , 2003 .