Drivers and Performance Outcomes of Trust in International Strategic Alliances: The Role of Organizational Complexity

Trust between partners has become a key construct in interfirm relationship management. However, elucidating the precise nature of the trust-performance link in international strategic alliances remains an important theoretical and empirical challenge for management scholars. Discordant findings evident in existing alliance research raise concerns that interpartner trust does not always enhance venture performance. To investigate this issue, we build and test a theoretical framework that integrates different perspectives of alliance functioning by focusing on the social and bureaucratic forces critical to cooperative processes. The model (1) identifies organizational complexity mechanisms underlying the development of trust in international strategic alliances, (2) points to alliance size as an important factor that conditions the trust-performance relationship, (3) incorporates a new, third-order conceptualization of interpartner trust in alliances, and (4) suggests a theory-based multidimensional assessment of alliance performance. Based on data collected through personal interviews in 177 international strategic alliances, the results suggest that, while interpartner trust is positively associated with alliance performance, this relationship becomes stronger when alliance size declines. We find that both distributive fairness and partner similarity are central to the achievement of a trusting alliance partnership. Managerial insights into developing successful trust-based international alliance exchanges are offered, and fruitful avenues of research are discussed.

[1]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Enhancing Communication between Marketing and Engineering: The Moderating Role of Relative Functional Identification , 1997 .

[2]  Daniel J. McAllister.  Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[3]  John E. Garen,et al.  The Returns to Schooling: A Selectivity Bias Approach with a Continuous Choice Variable , 1984 .

[4]  D. W. Barclay,et al.  The Effects of Organizational Differences and Trust on the Effectiveness of Selling Partner Relationships , 1997 .

[5]  Kenneth S. Law,et al.  Toward A Taxonomy of Multidimensional Constructs , 1998 .

[6]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Trust as an Organizing Principle Bill McEvily , 2003 .

[7]  Larry J. Williams,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods. , 1986 .

[8]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  Antecedents of Export Venture Performance: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Assessment , 2004 .

[9]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Still Matter? Research on the Role of Trust in Inter-Organizational Exchange , 2006 .

[10]  Willem Verbeke,et al.  Do Organizational Practices Matter in Role Stress Processes? A Study of Direct and Moderating Effects for Marketing-Oriented Boundary Spanners , 1996 .

[11]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[12]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea , 2003 .

[13]  R. Kramer,et al.  Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .

[14]  Anoop Madhok,et al.  Revisiting multinational firms' tolerance for joint ventures: a trust-based approach , 1995 .

[15]  Jeannie L. Johnson,et al.  Setting the Stage for Trust and Strategic Integration in Japanese-U.S. Cooperative Alliances , 1996 .

[16]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Effects of Supplier Market Orientation on Distributor Market Orientation and the Channel Relationship: The Distributor Perspective , 1998 .

[17]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[18]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing , 1994 .

[19]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  The Effects of Supplier Fairness on Vulnerable Resellers , 1995 .

[20]  P. Ring,et al.  Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships , 1994 .

[21]  Harbir Singh,et al.  The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode , 1988 .

[22]  Africa Ariño,et al.  Learning From Failure: Towards An Evolutionary Model of Collaborative Ventures , 1998 .

[23]  Arvind Parkhe.  Interfirm Diversity, Organizational Learning, and Longevity in Global Strategic Alliances , 1991 .

[24]  Robert McMurrian,et al.  An Investigation into the Antecedents of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors in a Personal Selling Context , 1997 .

[25]  Nirmalya Kumar,et al.  Reactions to Perceived Inequity in U.S. and Dutch Interorganizational Relationships , 2002 .

[26]  W. R. Dillon,et al.  Some Results on the Behavior of Alternate Covariance Structure Estimation Procedures in the Presence of Non-Normal Data , 1989 .

[27]  L. Stern,et al.  Assessing Reseller Performance from the Perspective of the Supplier , 1992 .

[28]  R. Gulati.  Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[29]  Steven C. Currall,et al.  International Joint Venture Trust: An Empirical Examination , 1997 .

[30]  Gregory T. Gundlach,et al.  The Structure of Commitment in Exchange , 1995 .

[31]  Charles N. Greene,et al.  The Effects of Formalization on Professional Involvement: A Compensatory Process Approach. , 1981 .

[32]  Maria L. Kraimer,et al.  SOURCES OF SUPPORT AND EXPATRIATE PERFORMANCE: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF EXPATRIATE ADJUSTMENT , 2001 .

[33]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements , 2002 .

[34]  Kyle J. Mayer,et al.  Complementarity and Evolution of Contractual Provisions: An Empirical Study of IT Services Contracts , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[35]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Understanding Adolescent Intentions to Smoke: An Examination of Relationships among Social Influence, Prior Trial Behavior, and Antitobacco Campaign Advertising , 2004 .

[36]  Arvind Parkhe.  “Messy” Research, Methodological Predispositions, and Theory Development in International Joint Ventures , 1993 .

[37]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[38]  C. Hardy.  Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems , 1983 .

[39]  Steven C. Currall,et al.  The Coevolution of Trust, Control, and Learning in Joint Ventures , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[40]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  A Test of the Individual Action Model for Organizational Information Commons , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[41]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Building Trust in Cross-Cultural Collaborations: Toward a Contingency Perspective: , 2002 .

[42]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships , 1996 .

[43]  F. Selnes,et al.  Promoting Relationship Learning , 2003 .

[44]  K. Glaister,et al.  Decision‐making Autonomy in UK International Equity Joint Ventures , 2003 .

[45]  L. Stern,et al.  Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants , 1993 .

[46]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  A Coordination Theory Approach to Organizational Process Design , 1997 .

[47]  H. Håkansson.  International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods: An Interaction Approach , 1982 .

[48]  B. Nooteboom,et al.  Effects of trust and governance on relational risk. , 1997 .

[49]  S. Park,et al.  When competition eclipses cooperation: an event history analysis of joint venture failure , 1996 .

[50]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[51]  John B. Cullen,et al.  Success through commitment and trust: the soft side of strategic alliance management , 2000 .

[52]  T. Huston,et al.  The Dyadic Trust Scale: Toward Understanding Interpersonal Trust in Close Relationships. , 1980 .

[53]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships , 1998 .

[54]  Preet S. Aulakh,et al.  The influence of complementarity, compatibility, and relationship capital on alliance performance , 2001 .

[55]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[56]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes , 1995 .

[57]  Steven C. Currall,et al.  A Multilevel Approach to Trust in Joint Ventures , 2002 .

[58]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[59]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on Performance , 1998 .

[60]  S. Majumdar.  On the utilization of resources: perspectives from the U.S. telecommunications industry , 1998 .

[62]  Guido Möllering,et al.  Special Issue: Trust in an Organizational Context: Contextual Confidence and Active Trust Development in the Chinese Business Environment , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[63]  Jagdip Singh.  Striking a Balance in Boundary-Spanning Positions: An Investigation of Some Unconventional Influences of Role Stressors and Job Characteristics on Job Outcomes of Salespeople , 1998 .

[64]  Preet S. Aulakh,et al.  Trust and Performance in Cross-Border Marketing Partnerships: A Behavioral Approach , 1996 .

[65]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  The Antecedents and Performance Implications of Cooperative Exchange Norms , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[66]  Arvind Parkhe.  Strategic Alliance Structuring: A Game Theoretic and Transaction Cost Examination of Interfirm Cooperation , 1993 .

[67]  J. Child.  Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[68]  O. Williamson.  Economic Institutions: Spontaneous and Intentional Governance , 1991 .

[69]  B. Byrne,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. , 1996 .

[70]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[71]  M. Hitt,et al.  Partner Selection in Emerging and Developed Market Contexts: Resource-Based and Organizational Learning Perspectives , 2000 .

[72]  J. M. Geringer,et al.  Assessing Replication and Extension. A Commentary on Glaister and Buckley: Measures of Performance in UK International Alliances , 1998 .

[73]  R. Lennox,et al.  Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. , 1991 .

[74]  Douglas J. Ayers,et al.  An Exploratory Investigation of Organizational Antecedents to New Product Success , 1997 .

[75]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Trust across borders , 2006 .

[76]  Robert S. Dooley,et al.  After the Ink Dries: The Interaction of Trust and Control in US-Based International Joint Ventures , 2002 .

[77]  A. Lewin,et al.  Determining organizational effectiveness: another look, and an agenda for research , 1986 .

[78]  S. Park,et al.  The Effect of National Culture, Organizational Complementarity, and Economic Motivation on Joint Venture Dissolution , 1997 .

[79]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Multiparty cooperation and performance in international equity joint ventures , 2004 .

[80]  James G. March,et al.  Crossroads---Organizational Performance as a Dependent Variable , 1997 .

[81]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Handbook of Trust Research , 2006 .

[82]  George R. Franke,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows , 1995 .

[83]  N. Noorderhaven,et al.  When Does Trust Matter to Alliance Performance , 2006 .

[84]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[85]  R. Ping.  A Parsimonious Estimating Technique for Interaction and Quadratic Latent Variables , 1995 .

[86]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .