Learning to See Random-Dot Stereograms

In the present study some specific properties of the learning effects reported for random-dot stereograms are examined. In experiment 1 the retinal position-specific learning effect was reproduced and in a follow-up experiment it was shown that the position specificity of learning can be accounted for by selective visual attention. In experiments 2 and 3 evidence was obtained that suggests that observers can learn, to a certain degree, monocular random-dot patterns and that this learning facilitates the depth percept. This result indicates that the traditional belief that random-dot stereograms are devoid of monocularly recognizable or useful forms should be reconsidered. In the second set of experiments the learning of two binocular surface properties of random-dot stereograms, depth edges and internal depth regions, was investigated. It was shown in experiment 4 that the depth edges of random-dot stereograms are not learned, whereas the results of experiment 5 indicate that the internal depth regions are learned. Finally, in experiment 6 it was shown that depth edges are learned when the internal depth regions of the stereogram are ambiguous. The results are discussed in terms of the importance of the particular type of stimulus used in the learning process and in terms of perceptual learning and attention.

[1]  J. Frisby,et al.  The Role of Monocularly Conspicuous Features in Facilitating Stereopsis from Random-Dot Stereograms , 1975 .

[2]  W. Richards,et al.  Anomalous stereoscopic depth perception. , 1971, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  G. J. Mitchison,et al.  Interpolation in stereoscopic matching , 1985, Nature.

[4]  O Braddick,et al.  Orientation-Specific Learning in Stereopsis , 1973, Perception.

[5]  D. LaBerge Attention and the measurement of perceptual learning , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[6]  G. J. Mitchison,et al.  The resolution of ambiguous stereoscopic matches by interpolation , 1987, Vision Research.

[7]  B. Julesz,et al.  Extension of Panum's fusional area in binocularly stabilized vision. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[8]  Depth is visible before figure in stereoscopic perception of random-dot patterns. , 1973, Vision research.

[9]  J. Mayhew,et al.  Stereopsis Masking in Humans is Not Orientationally Tuned , 1978, Perception.

[10]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Shifter circuits: a computational strategy for dynamic aspects of visual processing. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Learning-like phenomena in stereopsis , 1976, Nature.

[12]  John E. W. Mayhew,et al.  Psychophysical and Computational Studies Towards a Theory of Human Stereopsis , 1981, Artif. Intell..

[13]  B. Julesz,et al.  Independent Spatial-Frequency-Tuned Channels in Binocular Fusion and Rivalry , 1975 .

[14]  Howard S. Bashinski,et al.  Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  B. C. Motter,et al.  Responses of neurons in visual cortex (V1 and V2) of the alert macaque to dynamic random-dot stereograms , 1985, Vision Research.

[16]  Casper J. Erkelens,et al.  Fusional limits for a large random-dot stereogram , 1988, Vision Research.

[17]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  D Marr,et al.  Cooperative computation of stereo disparity. , 1976, Science.

[19]  John P. Frisby,et al.  Learning to See Complex Random-Dot Stereograms , 1975 .

[20]  R S Harwerth,et al.  Viewing Time and Stereoscopic Threshold with Random‐Dot Stereograms , 1977, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.