I3

The scrolling interaction is a pervasive human-computer interaction on smartphones, which can reflect intrinsic characteristics during dynamic browsings. Different from extrinsic statistical measures like frequency of visits and dwell time, intrinsic features underlying scrolling interactions reveal fine-grained implicit feedbacks about user interests. Toward this end, we explore user interest inference by extracting efficient browsing features from scrolling human-computer interactions on smartphones. In this paper, we first analyze browsing traces of 40 volunteers, and find two intrinsic browsing features underlying scrolling interactions, i.e., browsing velocity stability and browsing velocity sequence, which are tightly related to user interests. Inspired by the observation, we propose an Intelligent Interest Inference system, I3, which infers user interests through sensing scrolling interactions during browsings. Specifically, I3 first extracts the two intrinsic browsing features from users' scrolling interactions. Then, I3 applies a Naive Bayesian-based approach to construct an interest discriminator for coarse-grained user interest (i.e., like-preferred or dislike-preferred) inference. Furthermore, we develop a deep learning-based approach for I3 to train rating classifiers for fine-grained rating inference in like-preferred and dislike-preferred browsings respectively. Finally, I3 utilizes the interest discriminator and rating classifiers to infer exact user ratings about browsing contents on smartphones. Experimental results under browsing traces of 46 volunteers present that I3 achieves 92.4% overall accuracy in interest inference.

[1]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  Browsing in hypertext: a cognitive study , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[2]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Takeo Igarashi,et al.  Speed-dependent automatic zooming for browsing large documents , 2000, UIST '00.

[4]  M. Claypool,et al.  Inferring User Interest , 2001, IEEE Internet Comput..

[5]  Mark Claypool,et al.  Implicit interest indicators , 2001, IUI '01.

[6]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Reading time, scrolling and interaction: exploring implicit sources of user preferences for relevance feedback , 2001, Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.

[7]  John Riedl,et al.  Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms , 2001, WWW '01.

[8]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  Jannica Heinström Psychological factors behind incidental information acquisition , 2006 .

[10]  Hao Jiang,et al.  Personalized online document, image and video recommendation via commodity eye-tracking , 2008, RecSys '08.

[11]  Yehuda Koren,et al.  Factorization meets the neighborhood: a multifaceted collaborative filtering model , 2008, KDD.

[12]  Yi-Cheng Zhang,et al.  Solving the apparent diversity-accuracy dilemma of recommender systems , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Pearl Pu,et al.  Eye-tracking product recommenders' usage , 2010, RecSys '10.

[14]  Jimeng Sun,et al.  Temporal recommendation on graphs via long- and short-term preference fusion , 2010, KDD.

[15]  Madelijn Strick,et al.  Humor in the Eye Tracker: Attention Capture and Distraction from Context Cues , 2009, The Journal of general psychology.

[16]  Jiahui Liu,et al.  Personalized news recommendation based on click behavior , 2010, IUI '10.

[17]  Ryen W. White,et al.  No clicks, no problem: using cursor movements to understand and improve search , 2011, CHI.

[18]  Juan Manuel Cueva Lovelle,et al.  Implicit feedback techniques on recommender systems applied to electronic books , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Peifeng Yin,et al.  Silence is also evidence: interpreting dwell time for recommendation from psychological perspective , 2013, KDD.

[20]  Xiao Lu,et al.  Computing and applying topic-level user interactions in microblog recommendation , 2014, SIGIR.

[21]  Qiuzhen Wang,et al.  An eye-tracking study of website complexity from cognitive load perspective , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Modeling dwell time to predict click-level satisfaction , 2014, WSDM.

[23]  Alfredo De Santis,et al.  A triadic closure and homophily-based recommendation system for online social networks , 2015, World Wide Web.

[24]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  Spotlights: Attention-Optimized Highlights for Skim Reading , 2016, CHI.

[25]  Yanchun Zhang,et al.  Enhancing online video recommendation using social user interactions , 2017, The VLDB Journal.

[26]  Chang Liu,et al.  Scroll up or down?: Using Wheel Activity as an Indicator of Browsing Strategy across Different Contextual Factors , 2017, CHIIR.

[27]  Xing Xie,et al.  xDeepFM: Combining Explicit and Implicit Feature Interactions for Recommender Systems , 2018, KDD.

[28]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Understanding user interactions with podcast recommendations delivered via voice , 2018, RecSys.

[29]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Task, Information Seeking Intentions, and User Behavior: Toward A Multi-level Understanding of Web Search , 2019, CHIIR.