Do Women with Low Breast Density Have Regionally High Breast Density?

Average volumetric breast density has been found to be associated with interval cancers. The association is believed to be partly due to mammographic masking. We asked if regional density may be a more sensitive descriptor of masking than average density. In this work, we propose a new method to identify high density regions based on calibrating pixel-level volumetric breast density to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System BI-RADS Version 4 categories. Local breast density was measured using the single-energy X-ray absorptiometry SXA technique. In 583 women undergoing screening mammography, we found percent fibroglandular volume ranges that corresponded to each BI-RADS category: 0---4.9i¾?% BI-RADS 1, 5.0---18.2i¾?% BI-RADS 2, 18.3---48.9i¾?% BI-RADS 3 and 49.0---100i¾?% BI-RADS 4. Women with an average BI-RADS 1 category had 21840 pixels 0.014i¾?mm breast area considered high density category 4 compared to 186469 pixels 0.014i¾?mm in women with average BI-RADS 4 category. We conclude that some women with low breast density still have regions of high density that may mask breast cancers. These scores and localized density colorized maps may better help radiologists in the decision to utilize secondary adjuvant screening than whole breast BI-RADs scores.

[1]  Jingmei Li,et al.  Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case–control study of six alternative density assessment methods , 2014, Breast Cancer Research.

[2]  Jennifer A. Harvey,et al.  Breast Density into Clinical Practice , 2012, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[3]  Ralph Highnam,et al.  Volumetric Assessment of Breast Tissue Composition from FFDM Images , 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[4]  S. Cummings,et al.  Single x-ray absorptiometry method for the quantitative mammographic measure of fibroglandular tissue volume. , 2009, Medical physics.

[5]  L. Tabár,et al.  What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial. , 1987, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  Hon J. Yu,et al.  Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[7]  Jeff Wang,et al.  Improvements to Single Energy Absorptiometry Method for Digital Mammography to Quantify Breast Tissue Density , 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[8]  C. Lehman,et al.  Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study. , 2015, Annals of internal medicine.

[9]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Novel use of Single X-Ray Absorptiometry for Measuring Breast Density , 2005, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[10]  David Tritchler,et al.  Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Michael J. Carston,et al.  Texture Features from Mammographic Images and Risk of Breast Cancer , 2009, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.