Electrode distance and magnitude of SEMG

This paper reports experimental research undertaken to study the effect of variation of inter-electrode distance on the Surface Electromyogram (SEMG). The experiments were conducted on ten healthy subjects and they performed isometric contraction of their biceps of the right arm at 20, 50 and 80% of their maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). SEMG was recorded using surface electrodes with the distance between the two active electrodes was maintained at 18 and 36 mm while the distant electrode position was fixed for all the experiments. It has been observed that at low levels of muscle contraction there was no significant variation due to the change in the distance between the electrodes while at 50 and 80% of MVC there was a significant change in the amplitude of the SEMG measured by the continuous RMS of the signal. The study has confirmed the well known belief that there is an increase in the RMS of SEMG with muscle contraction but the clearly demonstrates that comparison should only be done if the distance between the electrodes is kept constant.

[1]  Daniel W. Stashuk,et al.  Detection of motor unit action potentials with surface electrodes: influence of electrode size and spacing , 1992, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  A Goswami,et al.  Effect of sampling frequency on EMG power spectral characteristics. , 1994, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  N. Hogan,et al.  Multiple site electromyograph amplitude estimation , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  N P Reddy,et al.  Surface electromyogram for the control of anthropomorphic teleoperator fingers. , 1996, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[5]  R. Mucke,et al.  Behaviour of EMG-parameters and conduction velocity in contractions with different muscle temperatures. , 1989, Biomedica biochimica acta.

[6]  Veerle Hermans,et al.  Influence of electrode position on changes in electromyograph parameters of the upper trapezius muscle during submaximal sustained contractions , 1997, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[7]  J Duchêne,et al.  Variability of some SEMG parameter estimates with electrode location. , 1998, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[8]  T. Moritani,et al.  Motor unit activity and surface electromyogram power spectrum during increasing force of contraction , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[9]  R. Scott,et al.  Myoelectric control of prostheses. , 1986, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[10]  R. Merletti,et al.  Modeling of surface myoelectric signals. I. Model implementation , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Myoelectric teleoperation of a complex robotic hand , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..