Direct comparison of 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer

Objective(s): 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT is a cost effective alternative for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. The aim of this study was to directly compare these two techniques in patients with prostate cancer. Methods: 28 man with prostate cancer were studied using 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in a short time period (<60 days). No intervention was done between the studies. Whole body PET/CT was done 60 minutes after IV injection of 2 MBq/Kg of 68Ga-PSMA. 99mTc-PSMA kit (PSMA I+S) was used for SPECT/CT and whole body imaging was performed 4 hours after IV injection of 740 MBq of 99mTc-PSMA. Images were interpreted independently and the results of each imaging were recorded. Results: The mean age of the patients was 64.7±9.6 years old and the mean time difference between two sets of images was 16.6±13.5 days. Abnormal uptake was seen in 25 (89.2%) patients by 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 20 (71.4%) patients with 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT. No patients with positive 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT had negative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. The mean number of detected lesions was 26.07±27.5 by 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 10.52±10.99 by 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT (P<0.001). Detection of lymph nodes and bone metastases were not significantly different between two sets of imaging (P>0.05), however 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT were more successful in detection of prostate bed lesions compared to 99mTc-PSMA scan. Interestingly, no patient with PSA level of >2.1 ng/ml had discordant result between two sets of images. Conclusion: 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT is as accurate as 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in M staging, however 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT detected more lesions compared to 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT. Detection rate was not significantly different between two techniques in patients with PSA levels>2.1 ng/ml.

[1]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Initial experience of Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in evaluation of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients , 2019, World journal of nuclear medicine.

[2]  D. Ye,et al.  The Value of 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT-Guided Surgery for Identifying and Locating Lymph Node Metastasis in Prostate Cancer Patients , 2018, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[3]  A. Maes,et al.  68Ga‐PSMA PET/CT Replacing Bone Scan in the Initial Staging of Skeletal Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: A Fait Accompli? , 2018, Clinical genitourinary cancer.

[4]  H. Le,et al.  Comparative study between 68Ga‐prostate‐specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and conventional imaging in the initial staging of prostate cancer , 2018, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[5]  Hossein Jadvar,et al.  PSMA Theranostics: Current Status and Future Directions , 2018, Molecular imaging.

[6]  W. Brenner,et al.  Comparison of hybrid 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT and 99mTc-DPD-SPECT/CT for the detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients: Additional value of morphologic information from low dose CT , 2018, European Radiology.

[7]  U. Haberkorn,et al.  Targeted alpha therapy of mCRPC: Dosimetry estimate of 213Bismuth-PSMA-617 , 2017, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[8]  A. Maes,et al.  Diagnostic sensitivity of Tc‐99m HYNIC PSMA SPECT/CT in prostate carcinoma: A comparative analysis with Ga‐68 PSMA PET/CT , 2017, The Prostate.

[9]  R. Bundschuh,et al.  Assessment of Bone Metastases in Patients with Prostate Cancer—A Comparison between 99mTc-Bone-Scintigraphy and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT , 2017, Pharmaceuticals.

[10]  Mark S. Litwin,et al.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Review , 2017, JAMA.

[11]  Bernd J. Krause,et al.  68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: Joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0 , 2017, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[12]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Preclinical Evaluation and First Patient Application of 99mTc-PSMA-I&S for SPECT Imaging and Radioguided Surgery in Prostate Cancer , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  B. Dai,et al.  Evaluation of 99mTc-labeled PSMA-SPECT/CT imaging in prostate cancer patients who have undergone biochemical relapse , 2016, Asian journal of andrology.

[14]  F. Mottaghy,et al.  Ga-PSMA PET / CT : Joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging : version 1 . 0 , 2017 .

[15]  F. Mottaghy,et al.  68 Ga-PSMA PET / CT : Joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging : version 1 . 0 , 2017 .

[16]  Damien Bolton,et al.  Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictors of Positive 68Ga-Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2016, European urology.

[17]  A. Rezaee,et al.  18F-NaF-PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy in the Detection of Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer. , 2016, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[18]  U. Haberkorn,et al.  The Rise of PSMA Ligands for Diagnosis and Therapy of Prostate Cancer , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Value of 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET for the Assessment of Lymph Node Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence: Comparison with Histopathology After Salvage Lymphadenectomy , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  Tim Holland-Letz,et al.  The Theranostic PSMA Ligand PSMA-617 in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer by PET/CT: Biodistribution in Humans, Radiation Dosimetry, and First Evaluation of Tumor Lesions , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Evaluation of Hybrid 68Ga-PSMA Ligand PET/CT in 248 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  M. Loda,et al.  Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Protein Expression in Tumor Tissue and Risk of Lethal Prostate Cancer , 2013, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[23]  Mohsen Beheshti,et al.  Impact of 18F-Choline PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence: Influence of Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Correlation with PSA Kinetics , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.