Land use at different spatial scales alters the functional role of web-building spiders in arthropod food webs

Abstract Web-building spiders are abundant generalist predators in agroecosystems that primarily forage on insects including economically important pests. Local management and landscape composition influence spider and prey communities and thereby their trophic interactions and functional role in arthropod food webs. We compared predator-prey interactions between organically managed cereal fields and sown flower-rich fields, both supported by agri-environmental schemes. The surrounding landscape of twelve study sites differed in the percentage of arable crops within a radius of 500 m around each site. We analyzed 1036 hand-collected web-building spiders with 5270 prey items from webs and 6777 potentially available prey items sampled by fenced suction sampling. Thysanoptera significantly dominated prey composition of web-building spiders in cereal fields located in landscapes with low percentages of arable crops, while Nematocera dominated prey composition in sown flower-rich fields. The captured prey numbers per spider web, irrespective of taxonomic identity, increased with the availability of potential prey, independent of habitat type or landscape composition. We did not find any effect on the compositions of web-building spiders and potential prey. Our results suggest that spider webs act as traps for prey that depend on prey density. However, this simple interpretation is only valid for the overall prey quantity, while capture success of single prey taxa may be habitat-specific and depend on landscape features. The impact of land use at different spatial scales on the functional role of web-building spiders should caution us towards density-based estimates of predation processes, e.g. when assessing the impact of agri-environmental schemes on arthropod food webs.

[1]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Landscape complexity differentially benefits generalized fourth, over specialized third, trophic level natural enemies , 2012 .

[2]  B. E. Freeman.  Studies on the Ecology of Larval Tipulinae (Diptera, Tipulidae) , 1967 .

[3]  S. Scheu,et al.  Small-Scale Spatial Pattern of Web-Building Spiders (Araneae) in Alfalfa: Relationship to Disturbance from Cutting, Prey Availability, and Intraguild Interactions , 2007, Environmental entomology.

[4]  Prey selection of orb-web spiders (Araneidae) on field margins , 2007 .

[5]  R. Denno,et al.  Responses of invertebrate natural enemies to complex-structured habitats: a meta-analytical synthesis , 2004, Oecologia.

[6]  O. Cheesman.  The impact of some field boundary management practices on the development of Dipsacus fullonum L. flowering stems, and implications for conservation , 1998 .

[7]  W. Nentwig.  The Prey of Spiders , 1987 .

[8]  B. Pré.  Vertical distribution of thrips and whitefly in greenhouses and relative efficiency of commercially available sticky traps for population monitoring , 2005 .

[9]  Riccardo Bommarco,et al.  Influence of habitat type and surrounding landscape on spider diversity in Swedish agroecosystems , 2007 .

[10]  Mattias Jonsson,et al.  Flow and stability of natural pest control services depend on complexity and crop rotation at the landscape scale , 2013 .

[11]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  CANONICAL ANALYSIS OF PRINCIPAL COORDINATES: A USEFUL METHOD OF CONSTRAINED ORDINATION FOR ECOLOGY , 2003 .

[12]  Adam J. Vanbergen,et al.  Experimental verification of suction sampler capture efficiency in grasslands of differing vegetation height and structure , 2008 .

[13]  Vivek Kumar,et al.  Temporal and spatial distribution of an invasive thrips species Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) , 2014 .

[14]  C. Wissel,et al.  A comparison of prey lengths among spiders , 1986, Oecologia.

[15]  L. Mestre,et al.  Trait‐mediated effects between predators: ant chemical cues induce spider dispersal , 2014 .

[16]  F. Samu,et al.  Effects of agricultural diversification on the abundance, distribution, and pest control potential of spiders: a review , 2000 .

[17]  R. Isaacs,et al.  Landscape structure and habitat management differentially influence insect natural enemies in an agricultural landscape , 2012 .

[18]  E. Marshall,et al.  Arthropod abundance and diversity in differently vegetated margins of arable fields , 1999 .

[19]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Landscape context of sheetweb spider (Araneae: Linyphiidae) abundance in cereal fields , 2005 .

[20]  M. Nyffeler.  PREY SELECTION OF SPIDERS IN THE FIELD , 1999 .

[21]  W. Nentwig.  The non-filter function of orb webs in spiders , 1983, Oecologia.

[22]  J. Dauber,et al.  Landscape effects on recolonisation patterns of spiders in arable fields , 2008 .

[23]  Johan Ekroos,et al.  Winners and losers of organic cereal farming in animal communities across Central and Northern Europe , 2014 .

[24]  Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer,et al.  A meta-analysis of crop pest and natural enemy response to landscape complexity. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[25]  P. Martin,et al.  Arthropod Diversity as Affected by Agricultural Management (Organic and Conventional Farming), Plant Species, and Landscape Context , 2009 .

[26]  Yasuaki Murakami.  Factors determining the prey size of the orb-web spider, Argiope amoena (L. Koch) (Argiopidae) , 1983, Oecologia.

[27]  S. Pekár.  Webs, diet, and fecundity of Theridion impressum (Araneae: Theridiidae) , 2000 .

[28]  D. Wise.  Effects of an experimental increase in prey abundance upon the reproductive rates of two orb-weaving spider species (Araneae: Araneidae) , 1979, Oecologia.

[29]  T. M. Bezemer,et al.  Long-term organic farming fosters below and aboveground biota: Implications for soil quality, biological control and productivity , 2008 .

[30]  V. Wolters,et al.  Utilization of Prey-Rich Patches Leads to Reproductive Advantages for Clustered Individuals of a Web-Building Spider , 2012 .

[31]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  O. Olsson,et al.  Beyond dispersal : the roles of animal movement in modern agricultural landscapes , 2014 .

[33]  V. Wolters,et al.  Management intensity and vegetation complexity affect web-building spiders and their prey , 2013, Oecologia.

[34]  A. Báldi,et al.  Are spiders reacting to local or landscape scale effects in Hungarian pastures , 2008 .

[35]  R. Suter,et al.  AN AERIAL LOTTERY: THE PHYSICS OF BALLOONING IN A CHAOTIC ATMOSPHERE , 1999 .

[36]  Y. Clough,et al.  Spider diversity in cereal fields: comparing factors at local, landscape and regional scales , 2005 .

[37]  A. Lang.  Intraguild interference and biocontrol effects of generalist predators in a winter wheat field , 2002, Oecologia.

[38]  M. Nyffeler,et al.  How Spiders Make a Living , 1994 .

[39]  Erich-Christian Oerke,et al.  Safeguarding production-losses in major crops and the role of crop protection , 2004 .

[40]  J. Harwood,et al.  Living where the food is: web location by linyphiid spiders in relation to prey availability in winter wheat , 2001 .

[41]  H. Larsson.  Economic damage by Limothrips denticornis in rye, triticale and winter barley , 2005 .

[42]  T. Blackledge.  Prey capture in orb weaving spiders: are we using the best metric? , 2011 .

[43]  Henryk Luka,et al.  Overwintering of arthropods in soils of arable fields and adjacent semi-natural habitats , 2000 .

[44]  E. Wada,et al.  Prey use by web-building spiders: stable isotope analyses of trophic flow at a forest-stream ecotone , 2004, Ecological Research.

[45]  M. Rundlöf,et al.  Assessing the effect of the time since transition to organic farming on plants and butterflies , 2011, The Journal of applied ecology.

[46]  F. Fabre,et al.  The conflicting relationships between aphids and men: a review of aphid damage and control strategies. , 2010, Comptes rendus biologies.

[47]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance in ecology , 2001 .

[48]  V. Wolters,et al.  Density-dependent and -independent effects on the joint use of space by predators and prey in terrestrial arthropod food-webs , 2011 .

[49]  F. Samu,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF AGROBIONT SPIDERS , 2002 .

[50]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Land‐use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: a hierarchical meta‐analysis , 2014, The Journal of applied ecology.

[51]  M. Nyffeler,et al.  Spinnen als Prädatoren von landwirtschaftlich schädlichen Blattläusen , 1982, Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde, Pflanzenschutz, Umweltschutz.

[52]  J. Harwood,et al.  The role of alternative prey in sustaining predator populations. , 2005 .

[53]  K. Sunderland,et al.  Composition, abundance and pest control potential of spider communities in agroecosystems: a comparison of European and US studies , 2003 .

[54]  W. Nentwig.  The selective prey of linyphiid-like spiders and of their space webs , 1980, Oecologia.

[55]  John M. Holland,et al.  Intraguild predation in winter wheat: prey choice by a common epigeal carabid consuming spiders , 2013 .

[56]  Henning Nordmeyer,et al.  Patchy weed distribution and site-specific weed control in winter cereals , 2006, Precision Agriculture.

[57]  R. Tollrian,et al.  Prey swarming: which predators become confused and why? , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[58]  L. Mound,et al.  Thysanoptera as Phytophagous Opportunists , 1995 .

[59]  A. Rypstra,et al.  Habitat selection in a large orb‐weaving spider: vegetational complexity determines site selection and distribution , 2000 .

[60]  Carsten Thies,et al.  Contrasting responses of arable spiders to the landscape matrix at different spatial scales , 2007 .

[61]  Carsten Thies,et al.  Mixed effects of organic farming and landscape complexity on farmland biodiversity and biological control potential across Europe , 2011 .

[62]  W. Eberhard.  Use of Artificial Webs to Determine Prey Available to Orb Weaving Spiders , 1983 .