Species-specific relative AHR1 binding affinities of 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran explain avian species differences in its relative potency.

Results of recent studies showed that 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran (PeCDF) and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) are equipotent in domestic chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) while PeCDF is more potent than TCDD in ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) and Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). To elucidate the mechanism(s) underlying these differences in relative potency of PeCDF among avian species, we tested the hypothesis that this is due to species-specific differential binding affinity of PeCDF to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor 1 (AHR1). Here, we modified a cell-based binding assay that allowed us to measure the binding affinity of dioxin-like compounds (DLCs) to avian AHR1 expressed in COS-7 (fibroblast-like cells). The results of the binding assay show that PeCDF and TCDD bind with equal affinity to chicken AHR1, but PeCDF binds with greater affinity than TCDD to pheasant (3-fold) and Japanese quail (5-fold) AHR1. The current report introduces a COS-7 whole-cell binding assay and provides a mechanistic explanation for differential relative potencies of PeCDF among species of birds.

[1]  S. Bursian,et al.  2,3,4,7,8‐pentachlorodibenzofuran is a more potent cytochrome P4501A inducer than 2,3,7,8‐tetrachlorodibenzo‐p‐dioxin in herring gull hepatocyte cultures , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[2]  Safe,et al.  Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and wildlife. , 1998, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  M. E. Hahn,et al.  cDNA cloning and characterization of a high affinity aryl hydrocarbon receptor in a cetacean, the beluga, Delphinapterus leucas. , 2001, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[4]  Paul D. Jones,et al.  Cytochrome P4501A induction by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and two chlorinated dibenzofurans in primary hepatocyte cultures of three avian species. , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[5]  S. Kennedy,et al.  The molecular basis for differential dioxin sensitivity in birds: role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  M. Oshimura,et al.  Human arylhydrocarbon receptor: functional expression and chromosomal assignment to 7p21. , 1994, Journal of biochemistry.

[7]  W. F. Greenlee,et al.  Filtration assay for quantitation of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) specific binding to whole cells in culture. , 1990, Analytical biochemistry.

[8]  R. Nelson,et al.  Developing tools for risk assessment in protected species: Relative potencies inferred from competitive binding of halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons to aryl hydrocarbon receptors from beluga (Delphinapterus leucas) and mouse. , 2010, Aquatic toxicology.

[9]  S. Kennedy,et al.  A luciferase reporter gene assay and aryl hydrocarbon receptor 1 genotype predict the LD50 of polychlorinated biphenyls in avian species. , 2012, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[10]  R. A. Neal,et al.  The examination and quantitation of tissue cytosolic receptors for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin using hydroxylapatite. , 1982, Analytical biochemistry.

[11]  P. Foster,et al.  Recombinant expression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor for quantitative ligand-binding analysis. , 2009, Analytical biochemistry.

[12]  Dongmei Wu,et al.  Amino acid sequence of the ligand-binding domain of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor 1 predicts sensitivity of wild birds to effects of dioxin-like compounds. , 2013, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[13]  Cytochrome P4501A induction in avian hepatocyte cultures exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls: comparisons with AHR1-mediated reporter gene activity and in ovo toxicity. , 2013, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[14]  Paul D. Jones,et al.  Sensitivity of Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica), Common pheasant (Phasianus colchicus), and White Leghorn chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) embryos to in ovo exposure to TCDD, PeCDF, and TCDF. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[15]  Dongmei Wu,et al.  Sequence and in vitro function of chicken, ring-necked pheasant, and Japanese quail AHR1 predict in vivo sensitivity to dioxins. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  G. Perdew,et al.  Use of 2-azido-3-[125I]iodo-7,8-dibromodibenzo-p-dioxin as a probe to determine the relative ligand affinity of human versus mouse aryl hydrocarbon receptor in cultured cells. , 2004, Molecular pharmacology.

[17]  S. Kennedy,et al.  Cytochrome P4501A induction in avian hepatocyte cultures: a promising approach for predicting the sensitivity of avian species to toxic effects of halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons. , 1996, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[18]  S. Kennedy,et al.  Relative potencies of aroclor mixtures derived from avian in vitro bioassays: comparisons with calculated toxic equivalents. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  N. Bunce,et al.  Characterization of the Ah receptor from human placental tissue. , 1995, Journal of biochemical toxicology.

[20]  M. E. Hahn,et al.  Relative contributions of affinity and intrinsic efficacy to aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand potency. , 2000, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[21]  S. Kennedy,et al.  Cytochrome P4501A induction in primary cultures of embryonic European starling hepatocytes exposed to TCDD, PeCDF and TCDF , 2013, Ecotoxicology.