Multiattribute Utility Instruments and Their Use

[1]  M. Palta,et al.  Comparison of 5 Health-Related Quality-of-Life Indexes Using Item Response Theory Analysis , 2010, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[2]  H. Sintonen,et al.  Do the 15D scores and time trade-off (TTO) values of hospital patients' own health agree? , 2010, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[3]  T. Kohlmann,et al.  The classification systems of the EQ-5D, the HUI II and the SF-6D: what do they have in common? , 2009, Quality of Life Research.

[4]  Julie Ratcliffe,et al.  Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation in adolescence: an assessment of the practicality and validity of the child health utility 9D in the Australian adolescent population. , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[5]  P. Dolan,et al.  To what extent do people prefer health states with higher values? A note on evidence from the EQ-5D valuation set. , 2004, Health economics.

[6]  G. Hawthorne,et al.  A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments , 2001, Annals of medicine.

[7]  E. Nord.  Health state values from multiattribute utility instruments need correction , 2001, Annals of medicine.

[8]  J. Richardson,et al.  Social Evaluation of Health Care Versus Personal Evaluation of Health States: Evidence on the Validity of Four Health-state Scaling Instruments Using Norwegian and Australian Surveys , 1993, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[9]  D. Streiner,et al.  Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to thier development and use , 1989 .

[10]  J. Richardson.  Review and Critique of Health Related Multi Attribute Utility Instruments , 2011 .