Synergies between Social Media Features and User Engagement to Enhance Online Brand Visibility - A Conceptual Model

Organizations today are fast realizing the impact of social media as a significant business driver for capitalizing the advantages on certain key strategic issues like user engagement and brand visibility. Integrating social media characteristics is one of the key differentiators for enhancing online brand visibility. Though a lot of research has been made on the social media usability and user engagement, the uniqueness of this research paper is the identification of synergies between the features of social media and user engagement to enhance online brand visibility. In this paper a conceptual model is explained by developing a social media-user engagement matrix to explain the synergies. The matrix integrates four parameters of User Engagement namely Involvement, Interaction, Intimacy and Influence with four Social Media characteristics namely Content, Relationship, Value and Structure to bring out the essence of interoperability. This paper has identified and listed certain metrics for measuring the online brand visibility. We believe that the outcome of this paper will make significant contribution to the existing body of knowledge by uniquely identifying and explaining the ‘social media-user engagement synergy’ and also listing appropriate metrics for measuring online brand visibility.

[1]  Paul R. Niven,et al.  Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results , 2002 .

[2]  T. Valente.  Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations , 1996 .

[3]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing , 1994 .

[4]  Carlos Flavián,et al.  International Journal of Information Management Relationship Quality, Community Promotion and Brand Loyalty in Virtual Communities: Evidence from Free Software Communities , 2022 .

[5]  Balachander Krishnamurthy,et al.  Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 , 2008, First Monday.

[6]  Lisa Harris,et al.  Social networks: the future of marketing for small business , 2009 .

[7]  Sarah J. S. Wilner,et al.  Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities , 2009 .

[8]  Bernd W. Wirtz,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE ATTRACTIVENESS , 2013 .

[9]  Mikael Johnson.  User Involvement, Social Media, and Service Evolution: The Case of Habbo , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  Christine Adhiambo Miyungi Odhiambo.  Social Media as a Tool of Marketing and Creating Brand awareness : Case study research , 2012 .

[11]  Isabelle Szmigin,et al.  Online community: enhancing the relationship marketing concept through customer bonding , 2005 .

[12]  T. Döbler,et al.  Towards a Theory of Campaigns: The Role of Opinion Leaders , 2002 .

[13]  Frederik D. Wiersema,et al.  Customer intimacy and other value disciplines , 1993 .

[14]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[15]  Susan C. Awe.  American Society for Training and Development (ASTD) , 1999 .

[16]  C. Grönroos.  From Marketing Mix to Relationship Marketing , 2012 .

[17]  Christian Grönroos,et al.  Has today's dominant marketing mix paradigm become a strait-jacket? A relationship building and management approach may be the answer. FromMix to Relationship Towards a Paradigm Shift in Marketing , 1994 .

[18]  B. Wellman,et al.  Social Connectivity in America: Changes in Adult Friendship Network Size From 2002 to 2007 , 2010 .

[19]  Anna Ståhlbröst.  Challenges with social media for user involvement , 2012 .

[20]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .

[21]  Edward L. Gubman.  Aligning People Strategies with Customer Value , 1995 .

[22]  C. Grönroos.  The relationship marketing process: communication, interaction, dialogue, value , 2004 .

[23]  Kahirol Mohd Salleh,et al.  Human resource development practitioners' perspectives on competencies : an application of American Society for Training and Development (ASTD) Workplace Learning and Performance (WLP) competency model in Malaysia , 2012 .

[24]  M. Sigala.  E-service quality and Web 2.0: expanding quality models to include customer participation and inter-customer support , 2009 .

[25]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influence. , 2002, The British journal of social psychology.

[26]  Laura A. Dabbish,et al.  Social Transparency in Networked Information Exchange: A Framework and Research Question , 2012 .

[27]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Coming Out in the Age of the Internet: Identity “Demarginalization” Through Virtual Group Participation , 1998 .

[28]  Ali Haj Khalifa,et al.  Measuring the Effectiveness of Online Advertising: The Tunisian Context , 2014 .