Upper Body Leaning can affect Forward Self-Motion Perception in Virtual Environments

The study of locomotion in virtual environments is a diverse and rewarding research area. Yet, creating effective and intuitive locomotion techniques is challenging, especially when users cannot move around freely. While using handheld input devices for navigation may often be good enough, it does not match our natural experience of motion in the real world. Frequently, there are strong arguments for supporting body-centered self-motion cues as they may improve orientation and spatial judgments, and reduce motion sickness. Yet, how these cues can be introduced while the user is not moving around physically is not well understood. Actuated solutions such as motion platforms can be an option, but they are expensive and difficult to maintain. Alternatively, within this article we focus on the effect of upper-body tilt while users are seated, as previous work has indicated positive effects on self-motion perception. We report on two studies that investigated the effects of static and dynamic upper body leaning on perceived distances traveled and self-motion perception (vection). Static leaning (i.e., keeping a constant forward torso inclination) had a positive effect on self-motion, while dynamic torso leaning showed mixed results. We discuss these results and identify further steps necessary to design improved embodied locomotion control techniques that do not require actuated motion platforms.

[1]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Do We Need to Walk for Effective Virtual Reality Navigation? Physical Rotations Alone May Suffice , 2010, Spatial Cognition.

[2]  Kosuke Sato,et al.  LazyNav: 3D ground navigation with non-critical body parts , 2015, 2015 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[3]  S.M. Harris,et al.  Information Processing , 1977, Nature.

[4]  Christophe Bourdin,et al.  Does tilt/translation ratio affect perception of deceleration in driving simulators? , 2011, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[5]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics , 2005 .

[6]  L. Harris,et al.  Visual and non-visual cues in the perception of linear self motion , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Visual–Vestibular Integration for Self-Motion Perception , 2012 .

[8]  Bernhard E. Riecke,et al.  An Integrative Approach to Presence and Self-Motion Perception Research , 2015, Immersed in Media, Telepresence Theory, Measurement & Technology.

[9]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Orientation of Selective Effects of Body Tilt on Visually Induced Perception of Self-Motion , 1998, Perceptual and motor skills.

[10]  L. Bringoux,et al.  Judging beforehand the possibility of passing under obstacles without motion: the influence of egocentric and geocentric frames of reference , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  Maud Marchal,et al.  Joyman: A human-scale joystick for navigating in virtual worlds , 2011, 2011 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[12]  Bernhard E. Riecke,et al.  Perceptual and Cognitive Factors for Self-Motion Simulation in Virtual Environments: How Can Self-Motion Illusions (“Vection”) Be Utilized? , 2013 .

[13]  Robert W. Lindeman,et al.  Silver Surfer: A system to compare isometric and elastic board interfaces for locomotion in VR , 2011, 2011 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[14]  J Clark Frank,et al.  Information Processing , 1970 .

[15]  Laurence R. Harris,et al.  Vestibular cues and virtual environments: choosing the magnitude of the vestibular cue , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316).

[16]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[17]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  NaviChair: Evaluating an Embodied Interface Using a Pointing Task to Navigate Virtual Reality , 2015, SUI.

[18]  Frits H. Post,et al.  Using the Wii Balance Board#8482; as a low-cost VR interaction device , 2008, VRST '08.

[19]  Angus H. Rupert,et al.  The Use of Tactile Cues to Modify the Perception of Self-Motion , 2008 .

[20]  Frank Steinicke,et al.  Human Walking in Virtual Environments: Perception, Technology, and Applications , 2013 .

[21]  Rudy Darken,et al.  The omni-directional treadmill: a locomotion device for virtual worlds , 1997, UIST '97.

[22]  Bernhard E. Riecke,et al.  To move or not to move: can active control and user-driven motion cueing enhance self-motion perception ("vection") in virtual reality? , 2012, SAP.

[23]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  A methodology for the evaluation of travel techniques for immersive virtual environments , 1998, Virtual Reality.

[24]  Robert W. Lindeman,et al.  Leaning-based travel interfaces revisited: frontal versus sidewise stances for flying in 3D virtual spaces , 2012, VRST '12.

[25]  Kristopher J. Blom,et al.  Intuitive, Hands-free Travel Interfaces for Virtual Environments , 2005 .

[26]  Bernhard E. Riecke,et al.  Auditory self-motion simulation is facilitated by haptic and vibrational cues suggesting the possibility of actual motion , 2009, TAP.

[27]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  Vibrotactile enhancement of auditory induced self-motion and spatial presence , 2006 .

[28]  Bernhard E. Riecke,et al.  Moving sounds enhance the visually-induced self-motion illusion (circular vection) in virtual reality , 2009, TAP.

[29]  A Berthoz,et al.  Spatial memory of body linear displacement: what is being stored? , 1995, Science.

[30]  Bernhard E. Riecke Simple user-generated motion cueing can enhance self-motion perception (Vection) in virtual reality , 2006, VRST '06.

[31]  M. A. Gresty,et al.  Influence of whole-body pitch tilt and kinesthetic cues on the perceived gravity-referenced eye level , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  A Berthoz,et al.  The contribution of otoliths and semicircular canals to the perception of two‐dimensional passive whole‐body motion in humans , 1997, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  Patricia S. Denbrook,et al.  Virtual Locomotion: Walking in Place through Virtual Environments , 1999, Presence.

[34]  Robert S. Allison,et al.  Postural and viewpoint oscillation effects on the perception of self-motion. , 2012 .

[35]  Jelte E. Bos,et al.  A theory on visually induced motion sickness , 2008, Displays.

[36]  W Bles,et al.  How to use body tilt for the simulation of linear self motion. , 2004, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[37]  L. Bringoux,et al.  Pitch body orientation influences the perception of self-motion direction induced by optic flow , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[38]  Rebecca J. St George,et al.  The sense of self‐motion, orientation and balance explored by vestibular stimulation , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  Thomas A. Furness,et al.  The Effects of the Interface on Navigation in Virtual Environments , 1998 .

[40]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception , 1973, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments , 1999, SIGGRAPH.