Convective cloud identification and classification in daytime satellite imagery using standard deviation limited adaptive clustering

[1] This paper describes a statistical clustering approach toward the classification of cloud types within meteorological satellite imagery, specifically, visible and infrared data. The method is based on the Standard Deviation Limited Adaptive Clustering (SDLAC) procedure, which has been used to classify a variety of features within both polar orbiting and geostationary imagery, including land cover, volcanic ash, dust, and clouds of various types. In this study, the focus is on classifying cumulus clouds of various types (e.g., “fair weather, ”towering, and newly glaciated cumulus, in addition to cumulonimbus). The SDLAC algorithm is demonstrated by showing examples using Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) 12, Meteosat Second Generation's (MSG) Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI), and the Moderate Resolution Infrared Spectrometer (MODIS). Results indicate that the method performs well, classifying cumulus similarly between MODIS, SEVIRI, and GOES, despite the obvious channel and resolution differences between these three sensors. The SDLAC methodology has been used in several research activities related to convective weather forecasting, which offers some proof of concept for its value.

[1]  R. Welch,et al.  Automated Cloud Classification of Global AVHRR Data Using a Fuzzy Logic Approach , 1997 .

[2]  Kwo-Sen Kuo,et al.  Clustering, randomness, and regularity in cloud fields: 5. The nature of regular cumulus cloud fields , 1998 .

[3]  Tammy M. Weckwerth,et al.  Horizontal Convective Rolls: Determining the Environmental Conditions Supporting their Existence and Characteristics , 1997 .

[4]  R. Elton,et al.  Particulate air pollution and the blood , 1999, Thorax.

[5]  R. Welch,et al.  Clustering, randomness and regularity in cloud fields: 1. Theoretical considerations , 1992 .

[6]  C. Magono,et al.  The Size Distribution of Cumulus Clouds as a Function of Cloud Amount , 1982 .

[7]  M. Lemone,et al.  Direct Testing of a Three-Dimensional Model of the Planetary Boundary Layer Against Experimental Data , 1978 .

[8]  James E. Evans,et al.  Quantifying Delay Reduction Benefits for Aviation Convective Weather Decision Support Systems , 2004 .

[9]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Aviation Applications for Satellite-Based Observations of Cloud Properties, Convection Initiation, In-Flight Icing, Turbulence, and Volcanic Ash , 2007 .

[10]  Ronald M. Welch,et al.  Polar Cloud and Surface Classification Using AVHRR Imagery: An Intercomparison of Methods , 1992 .

[11]  S. K. Sengupta,et al.  Cloud field classification based upon high spatial resolution textural features: 2. Simplified vector approaches , 1989 .

[12]  Ronald M. Welch,et al.  Reflected fluxes for broken clouds over a Lambertian surface , 1989 .

[13]  Paul M. Tag,et al.  An AVHRR Multiple Cloud-Type Classification Package , 2000 .

[14]  Paul M. Tag,et al.  Toward Automated Interpretation of Satellite Imagery for Navy Shipboard Applications , 1992 .

[15]  T. Casadevall Discussions and recommendations from the workshop on Impacts of volcanic Ash on Airport Facilities, Seattle, Washington, April 26-28, 1993 , 1993 .

[16]  Kwo-Sen Kuo,et al.  A comparison of paired histogram, maximum likelihood, class elimination, and neural network approaches for daylight global cloud classification using AVHRR imagery , 1999 .

[17]  Guy Kelman,et al.  Satellite detection of severe convective storms by their retrieved vertical profiles of cloud particle effective radius and thermodynamic phase , 2008 .

[18]  R. Sykes,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Sheared Convection , 1989 .

[19]  S. Sengupta,et al.  Marine Stratocumulus Cloud Fields off the Coast of Southern California Observed Using LANDSAT Imagery. Part I: Structural Characteristics , 1988 .

[20]  J. Mecikalski,et al.  Application of Satellite-Derived Atmospheric Motion Vectors for Estimating Mesoscale Flows , 2005 .

[21]  S. K. Sengupta,et al.  Marine Stratocumulus Cloud Fields off the Coast of Southern California Observed Using LANDSAT Imagery. Part II: Textural Analysis , 1988 .

[22]  Ronald M. Welch,et al.  Cumulus Cloud Field Morphology and Spatial Patterns Derived from High Spatial Resolution Landsat Imagery , 1990 .

[23]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  INTRODUCING THE NEXT-GENERATION ADVANCED BASELINE IMAGER ON GOES-R , 2005 .

[24]  Ronald M. Welch,et al.  Clustering, randomness, and regularity in cloud fields: 4. Stratocumulus cloud fields , 1992 .

[25]  U.S. Nair,et al.  Impact of land use on Costa Rican regional climate , 2000, IGARSS 2000. IEEE 2000 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Taking the Pulse of the Planet: The Role of Remote Sensing in Managing the Environment. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37120).

[26]  Christopher S. Velden,et al.  Development of an Objective Scheme to Estimate Tropical Cyclone Intensity from Digital Geostationary Satellite Infrared Imagery , 1998 .

[27]  S. Sengupta,et al.  The effect of spatial resolution upon texture-based cloud field classifications , 1989 .

[28]  K. T. Calden Tactical 0-2 Hour Convective Weather Forecasts for FAA , 2004 .

[29]  Kwo-Sen Kuo,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of cumulus clouds over the ocean , 1993, Proceedings of IGARSS '93 - IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[30]  J. Mecikalski,et al.  Forecasting Convective Initiation by Monitoring the Evolution of Moving Cumulus in Daytime GOES Imagery , 2004 .

[31]  Christopher S. Velden,et al.  Application of surface-adjusted GOES low-level cloud-drift winds in the environment of Atlantic tropical cyclones. Part I: Methodology and validation , 2002 .

[32]  Terri Betancourt,et al.  NCAR Auto-Nowcast System , 2003 .

[33]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  Fractal Statistics of Cloud Fields , 1989 .

[34]  Elizabeth E. Ebert,et al.  Analysis of Polar Clouds from Satellite Imagery Using Pattern Recognition and a Statistical Cloud Analysis Scheme , 1989 .

[35]  W. MacNee,et al.  Particulate Air Pollution: Injurious and Protective Mechanisms in the Lungs , 1999 .

[36]  Udaysankar S. Nair Impact of land surface heterogeneity on the spatial organization of cumulus clouds , 2001 .

[37]  W. Shenk,et al.  A Multispectral Cloud Type Identification Method Developed for Tropical Ocean Areas with Nimbus-3 MRIR Measurements , 1976 .

[38]  Samir I. Shaheen,et al.  A Modular Computer Vision System for Picture Segmentation and Interpretation , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[39]  P. Rabindra,et al.  An interactive hybrid expert system for polar cloud and surface classification , 1992 .

[40]  R. Bras,et al.  Clustered or regular cumulus cloud fields: The statistical character of observed and simulated cloud fields , 1990 .

[41]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  Nearest Neighbor Spacing of Fair Weather Cumulus Clouds. , 1990 .

[42]  J. Key,et al.  Cloud cover analysis with Arctic Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer data: 2. Classification with spectral and textural measures , 1990 .

[43]  Ronald M. Welch,et al.  An intercomparison of artificial intelligence approaches for polar scene identification , 1993 .

[44]  M. A. Engelstad,et al.  The three‐dimensional structure of cumulus clouds over the ocean: 1. Structural analysis , 1993 .

[45]  R. Ellingson,et al.  Cumulus Cloud Formulations for Longwave Radiation Calculations , 1999 .

[46]  Roger G. Barry,et al.  Cloud cover analysis with Arctic AVHRR data: 1. Cloud detection , 1989 .

[47]  Steven J. Nieman,et al.  Upper-Tropospheric Winds Derived from Geostationary Satellite Water Vapor Observations , 1997 .

[48]  Toshiro Inoue,et al.  A cloud type classification with NOAA 7 split‐window measurements , 1987 .

[49]  Elizabeth E. Ebert,et al.  A Pattern Recognition Technique for Distinguishing Surface and Cloud Types in the Polar Regions , 1987 .

[50]  Kristopher M. Bedka,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of GOES Cloud-Top Properties for Nowcasting Convective Initiation , 2008 .

[51]  R. Welch,et al.  Clustering, randomness and regularity in cloud fields. I - Theoretical considerations. II - Cumulus cloud fields , 1992 .

[52]  D. Dockery,et al.  Particulate air pollution as a predictor of mortality in a prospective study of U.S. adults. , 1995, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[53]  Richard L. Bankert,et al.  Cloud Classification of AVHRR Imagery in Maritime Regions Using a Probabilistic Neural Network , 1994 .

[54]  Ronald M. Welch,et al.  Cumulus Cloud Properties Derived Using Landsat Satellite Data , 1986 .